Cited by 19Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment StudiesRetinal Imaging and AnalysisOphthalmology and Visual Health Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Saving sight in China and beyond: the Lifeline Express model

Open access

Abstract

Cataract and diabetic retinopathy are leading causes of blindness globally. Lifeline Express (LEX) has pioneered the provision of cataract surgery in rural China from custom-built trains and eye centres nationwide. Over the past two decades, LEX has provided free cataract surgery for over 180 000 patients in China. In China, half of the adult population has prediabetes and 113 million adults have diabetes. Recognising the rising threat of diabetic retinopathy, LEX has expanded to providing free diabetic retinopathy screening nationwide by establishing 29 Diabetic Retinopathy Screening Centres across China. Source of referrals included host hospitals, the community and out-reach mobile vans equipped with fundus cameras. Fundi photos taken in the mobile vans were electronically transferred to primary graders. LEX also leveraged the widespread smartphone use to provide electronic medical reports via WeChat, the most popular instant messenger app in China. From April 2014 to December 2016, 34 506 patients with diabetes underwent screening, of which 27.2% (9,396) were identified to have diabetic retinopathy. China’s latest national health strategy (‘Healthy China 2030 Plan’) has championed the ‘prevention first’ principle and early screening of chronic diseases. LEX has accordingly evolved to extend its services to save sight in China—from cataract surgery to diabetic retinopathy screening and most recently outreaching beyond its national borders in a pilot South–South collaboration. With health at the top of the China’s developmental agenda and the country’s growing role in global health—LEX’s large-scale telemedicine-enabled programme could represent a potentially scalable model for nationwide diabetic retinopathy screening elsewhere.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmjgh-2018-000766

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Compliance with referral suggestion for a full ocular examination among diabetic patients was 33% in one rural region of the Lifeline Express Program and 50.7% in urban regions.

    “Compliance with referral suggestion for a full ocular examination among diabetic patients was reported as 33% in one rural region of the Lifeline Express Program and as 50.7% in urban regions14,43,44.”

    From Economic evaluation for medical artificial intelligence: accuracy vs. cost-effectiveness in a diabetic retinopathy screening case (2024) · cites this paper as [44]

    The Preliminary evaluation reports that in Mianzhu, one-third of patients who screened positive and were referred to ophthalmologists subsequently received treatment at the host hospital. That is not a measure of compliance with a referral for a full ocular examination: others may have sought care elsewhere. The paper does not report a 50.7% figure for urban regions. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 28

  1. 10.1001/jama.2017.7596 · DOI
  2. 10.1080/09286580701396720 · DOI
  3. 10.1056/NEJMra021678 · DOI
  4. 10.2337/dc13-1990 · DOI
  5. 10.1056/NEJMoa1414264 · DOI
  6. 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2013-304338 · DOI
  7. 10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.09.002 · DOI
  8. Kawasaki, 2015, Cost-utility analysis of screening for diabetic retinopathy in Japan: a probabilistic Markov modeling study, Ophthalmic Epidemiol, 22, 4, 10.3109/09286586.2014.988876 · DOI
  9. 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2015-307382 · DOI
  10. 10.1136/bmj.e874 · DOI
  11. Standards of medical care in diabetes-2015: summary of revisions. Diabetes care 2015;38(Suppl S4). · DOI
  12. 10.1056/NEJMhpr051133 · DOI
  13. 10.1377/hlthaff.2012.1017 · DOI
  14. 10.1056/NEJMp1410425 · DOI
  15. 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2003.01077.x · DOI
  16. Mathers, 2005, Counting the dead and what they died from: an assessment of the global status of cause of death data, Bull World Health Organ, 83, 171
  17. 10.1093/ajh/hpv029 · DOI
  18. Keenum, 2016, Patients' adherence to recommended follow-up eye care after diabetic retinopathy screening in a publicly funded county clinic and factors associated with follow-up eye care use, JAMA Ophthalmol, 134, 1221, 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2016.3081 · DOI
  19. Mtuya, 2016, Reasons for poor follow-up of diabetic retinopathy patients after screening in Tanzania: a cross-sectional study, BMC Ophthalmol, 16, 115, 10.1186/s12886-016-0288-z · DOI
  20. Hu, 2017, China’s Belt and Road Initiative from a global health perspective, Lancet Glob Health, 5, e752, 10.1016/S2214-109X(17)30250-4 · DOI
  21. Horton, 2018, Offline: Are China’s global ambitions good for global health?, Lancet, 390, 2752, 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)33355-X · DOI
  22. Tang, 2017, China’s Silk Road and global health, Lancet, 390, 2595, 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32898-2 · DOI
  23. 10.1016/j.ophtha.2008.05.014 · DOI
  24. Scanlon, 2016, Screening attendance, age group and diabetic retinopathy level at first screen, Diabet Med, 33, 904, 10.1111/dme.12957 · DOI
  25. Scotland, 2016, Modelling the cost-effectiveness of adopting risk-stratified approaches to extended screening intervals in the national diabetic retinopathy screening programme in Scotland, Diabet Med, 33, 886, 10.1111/dme.13129 · DOI
  26. 10.1001/jama.2013.168118 · DOI
  27. 10.2471/BLT.07.050112 · DOI
  28. 10.1001/jama.298.8.902 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Wong, I. Y. H., Ni, M. Y., Wong, I. O. L., Fong, N., & Leung, G. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Hong Kong (HK)
  • Lifeline Express, Lifeline Express Hong Kong Foundation, Hong Kong, China
Corresponding author
Ni, Michael Yuxuan
Venue
BMJ Global Health
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2018-08
Volume
3
Issue
4
Pages
e000766
ISSN
2059-7908 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2885486989
Cited by
19
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3
FWCI
1.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • BMJ Global Health (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Li Ka Shing Foundation
  • Joint Shantou International Eye Center
  • Fred Hollows Foundation
  • China State Construction Engineering Corporation
  • People's Government of Jilin Province
  • Peking University
  • Peking Union Medical College Hospital
  • Peking University Third Hospital
  • Hutchison Whampoa Limited
  • Peking Union Medical College
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Retinal Imaging and Analysis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Ophthalmology and Visual Health Research
Keywords
cataract surgery, diabetic retinopathy screening, telemedicine, fundus photography, WeChat, South-South cooperation, blindness prevention, Healthy China 2030, rural China

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review