Cited by 32Vaccine Coverage and HesitancyGlobal Maternal and Child HealthLegal, Health, Environmental and COVID-19 Challenges

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Addressing disruptions in childhood routine immunisation services during the COVID-19 pandemic: perspectives from Nepal, Senegal and Liberia

Open access

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Abstract The COVID-19 pandemic has inflicted multifaceted disruptions to routine immunisation from global to local levels, affecting every aspect of vaccine supply, access, and demand. Since March 2020, country programmes have implemented a range of strategies to either continue vaccination services during COVID-19 measures like ‘lockdown’ and/or resume services when risks of SARS-CoV-2 transmission could be appropriately mitigated. Through the Exemplars in Global Health partnership in Liberia, Nepal, and Senegal, we conducted interviews with immunisation programme managers and ministry of health leadership to better understand how they have addressed the myriad vaccination challenges posed by the ongoing pandemic. From establishing alternative modes of service delivery to combatting vaccine distrust and rumours via risk communication campaigns, many routine immunisation programmes have demonstrated how to adapt, resume, and/or maintain vital vaccination efforts during the COVID-19 crisis. Yet millions of children remain un- or under-vaccinated worldwide, and the same programmes striving to implement catch-up services for missed doses and postponed mass campaigns will also soon be tasked with COVID-19 vaccine deployment. As laid bare by the current pandemic, the world’s gains against vaccine-preventable diseases are fragile: enshrined by a delicate global ecosystem of logistics, supply, and procurement, the success of routine immunisation ultimately rests upon dedicated programme staff, the resources and support available to them, and then the trust in and demand for vaccines by their recipients. Our collective lessons learned during COVID-19 offer insights in programme adaptation and resilience that, if prioritised, could strengthen equitable, sustainable vaccine delivery for all populations. Summary box Key message 1 : As the COVID-19 pandemic affected routine immunisation services worldwide, country programmes have used a range of mitigation strategies to maintain vaccine delivery and/or resume interrupted programming. Interviews with immunisation programme managers and Ministry of Health staff provided key perspectives and lessons learned on how countries have approached routine immunisation services during the COVID-19 crisis. Key message 2 : Key themes for mitigating COVID-19’s effects on routine immunisation included prioritising continued services with strengthened infection prevention control; identifying alternative locations and approaches to providing vaccine services (e.g., conducting door-to-door vaccination if facility-based services were not possible); engaging in effective communications and mobilisation activities, especially to offset misinformation about COVID-19 and vaccines; setting up systems and strategies for reaching children who missed doses amid periods of disruption; and conducting catch-up campaigns as soon as SARS-CoV-2 transmission risks could be minimised. Key message 3 : The ways in which COVID-19 has affected routine immunisation services have varied over time and across settings, underscoring the importance of contextually-tailored mitigation efforts and adaptation given evolving challenges amid an ongoing pandemic. As countries prepare and initiate roll-out COVID-19 vaccines, it will be vital to avoid one-size-fits-all implementation strategies and support the continuance of routine immunisation services through this next phase of COVID-19 response.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmjgh-2021-005031

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. Causey K , Fullman N , Sorensen RJ , et al . Estimating global and regional disruptions to routine childhood vaccine coverage during the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020: a modelling study. The Lancet 2021;398. · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-002938 · DOI
  3. 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-003430 · DOI
  4. 10.1186/s12913-017-2626-0 · DOI
  5. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.05.116 · DOI
  6. Glasgow, 2018, Pragmatic applications of RE-AIM for health care initiatives in community and clinical settings, Prev Chronic Dis, 15, 10.5888/pcd15.170271 · DOI
  7. 10.1186/1748-5908-4-50 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Chandir, 2020, Impact of COVID-19 lockdown on routine immunisation in Karachi, Pakistan, Lancet Glob Health, 8, e1118, 10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30290-4 · DOI
  9. Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance . Delivering life-saving vaccines during the COVID-19 pandemic, 2020. Available: https://www.gavi.org/vaccineswork/delivering-life-saving-vaccines-during-covid-19-pandemic [Accessed 07 Aug 2020]. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Dixit, S. M., Sarr, M., Gueye, D. M., Muther, K., Yarnko, T. R., Bednarczyk, R. A., Clarke, A. T., Diakhite, F., Diallo, A., Dounebaine, B., Duwadi, S. B., Ellis, A. S., Fullman, N., Gerthe, N., Gautam, J. S., Hester, K. A., Ikilezi, G., Mbengue, R. S., Mboup, S., Ndiaye, B. P., Rajbhandari, R. M., Phillips, D. E., & Freeman, M. C.
Affiliations
  • Center for Molecular Dynamics - Nepal (NP)
  • Institute of Health Research, Epidemiological Surveillance and Training (SN)
  • Last Mile Health, Monrovia, Liberia
  • Emory University (US)
  • Ministry of Health and Social Welfare (LR)
  • Focal Point for EPI and Surveillance Activities, Health Center of Rufisque, Dakar, Senegal
  • Expanded Programme on Immunisation Unit, WHO Country Office Senegal, Dakar, Senegal
  • Health Section Chief, Benighat, Nepal
  • Gates Ventures (US)
  • Ministry of Health and Population (NP)
  • Focal Point for EPI and Surveillance Activities, Health Center, Philip Maguilene Senghor of Yoff, Dakar, Senegal
Corresponding author
Fullman, Nancy
Venue
BMJ Global Health
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2021-07
Volume
6
Issue
7
Pages
e005031
ISSN
2059-7908 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3179798693
Cited by
32
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 2
FWCI
3.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMJ Global Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • medRxiv (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
  • Gates Ventures
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Global Maternal and Child Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Legal, Health, Environmental and COVID-19 Challenges
Keywords
routine immunization, childhood immunization, COVID-19 pandemic, healthcare disruption, vaccine delivery, immunization services, child health, Nepal, Senegal, Liberia
MeSH terms
COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Humans, Immunization, Liberia, Nepal, Senegal, Pandemics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review