Cited by 29Poverty, Education, and Child WelfareChild Nutrition and Water AccessMigration, Racism, and Human Rights

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Cash, COVID-19 and aid cuts: a mixed-method impact evaluation among South Sudanese refugees registered in Kiryandongo settlement, Uganda

Open access
Stein, Daniel, Bergemann, Rico, Lanthorn, Heather, Kimani, Emma, Nshakira-Rukundo, Emmanuel, Li, Yulei·2022·BMJ Global Health

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: In this paper, we estimate the impact after 4-8 months of a large one-off unconditional cash transfer delivered to refugees during a time of dual shocks: the COVID-19 pandemic and cuts to monthly aid. We focus on four key outcomes: (1) health-seeking behaviour; (2) COVID-19 specific preventive health practices; (3) food security and (4) psychological well-being. METHODS: We use both quantitative and qualitative data to understand the impact of a cash transfer in this context. Quantitatively, we use a baseline survey of 1200 households (Q4 2019) and follow-up with three rounds of phone surveys in Q2 and Q3 2021, capturing at least half the sample in each round. We exploit an experimental variation in the timing of the cash transfer to assess the effect of the cash transfer through ordinary least squares regressions of intention to treat. Controlling for key baseline characteristics, we analyse the effect of the cash transfer on health access, COVID-19 health practices, food security and psychological well-being. Qualitatively, we make use of a longitudinal, small-n sample of refugee respondents, each of whom we interviewed up to 15 times between February and September 2020 to understand change over time and to go deeper into key topics. RESULTS: We do not find a statistically significant effect (6.2%, p=0.188) of receiving the cash transfer on preventative measures against COVID-19. However, households receiving the cash transfer were more food secure, with a 14.4% (p=0.011) improvement on the food security index, have better psychological well-being (24.5%, p=0.003) and are more likely to seek healthcare in the private health facilities (10.4%, p=0.057) as compared with control households. We do not find significant results on the value of food consumption. Overall, we find stronger treatment effects for households that were the first to receive the cash transfers. CONCLUSION: Taken together, we find significant support for the importance of cash transfers to refugee households mitigating against declines in food security and mental well-being in the face of shocks.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmjgh-2021-007747

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1 The Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) flow diagram for sample selection. PSN, Persons with Specific Needs.
Figure 1 The Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) flow diagram for sample selection. PSN, Persons with Specific Needs.CC BY-NC · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 32

  1. 10.1126/sciadv.abe0997 · DOI
  2. Al-Awaida W , Al-Ameer HJ , Al-Turk H . Psychological effects of quarantine on Syrian refugees, compared to the Jordanian populations. IOM.doi:doi/epdf/10.1111/imig.12847 · DOI
  3. Kizilhan, 2020, Psychological impact of COVID-19 in a refugee cAMP in Iraq, Psychiatry Clin Neurosci, 74, 659, 10.1111/pcn.13142 · DOI
  4. Manirambona, 2021, Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the food rations of refugees in Rwanda, Int J Equity Health, 20, 10.1186/s12939-021-01450-1 · DOI
  5. McKague, 2020, South Sudanese refugees in Uganda face overwhelming odds against COVID-19, SSMJ, 13, 57
  6. 10.1093/qje/qjw025 · DOI
  7. 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-004661 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Bauer, 2021, Integrating youth mental health into cash transfer programmes in response to the COVID-19 crisis in low-income and middle-income countries, Lancet Psychiatry, 8, 340, 10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30382-5 · DOI
  9. Doocy, 2017, Cash‐based approaches in humanitarian emergencies: a systematic review, Campbell Syst Rev, 13, 1, 10.4073/csr.2017.17 · DOI
  10. 10.1016/j.jdeveco.2013.11.009 · DOI
  11. Schwab, 2019, Comparing the productive effects of cash and food transfers in a crisis setting: evidence from a randomised experiment in Yemen, J Dev Stud, 55, 29, 10.1080/00220388.2019.1687880 · DOI
  12. Richardson, 2017, The symbolic violence of 'outbreak': A mixed methods, quasi-experimental impact evaluation of social protection on Ebola survivor wellbeing, Soc Sci Med, 195, 77, 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.11.018 · DOI
  13. Londoño-Vélez, 2022, The impact of emergency cash assistance in a pandemic: experimental evidence from Colombia, Rev Econ Stat, 104, 157, 10.1162/rest_a_01043 · DOI
  14. Varshney, 2021, COVID-19, government transfer payments, and investment decisions in farming business: evidence from northern India, Appl Econ Perspect Policy, 43, 248, 10.1002/aepp.13144 · DOI
  15. Tossou, 2021, COVID-19 and the impact of cash transfers on health care use in Togo, BMC Health Serv Res, 21, 10.1186/s12913-021-06895-2 · DOI
  16. Rustad, 2021, Maternal health care among refugees and host communities in northern Uganda: access, quality, and discrimination, Front Glob Womens Health, 2, 626002, 10.3389/fgwh.2021.626002 · DOI
  17. Palmer, 2017, Including refugees in disease elimination: challenges observed from a sleeping sickness programme in Uganda, Confl Health, 11, 10.1186/s13031-017-0125-x · DOI
  18. Mwenyango, 2019, Health needs and challenges of women and children in Uganda’s refugee settlements: Conceptualising a role for social work, Int Soc Work, 62, 1535, 10.1177/0020872819865010 · DOI
  19. Asiedu, 2021, A call for structured ethics appendices in social science papers, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 118, 10.1073/pnas.2024570118 · DOI
  20. Morton, 2022, Consensus statement on measures to promote equitable authorship in the publication of research from international partnerships, Anaesthesia, 77, 264, 10.1111/anae.15597 · DOI
  21. 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2010.06.004 · DOI
  22. 10.1177/1525822X05279903 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1136/bmj.d142 · DOI
  24. 10.1093/biomet/93.3.491 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Saldana J . The coding manual for qualitative researchers. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications Ltd, 2021.
  26. Smith LC , Subandoro A . Measuring food security using household expenditure surveys. IFRI 2007.doi:10.2499/0896297675 · DOI
  27. 10.1016/S0022-3999(99)00004-5 · DOI · Paper page
  28. McGuire J , Kaiser C , Bach-Mortensen A . The impact of cash transfers on subjective well-being and mental health in low- and middle- income countries: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Center for Open Science, 2020. Available: https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/socarx/ydr54.html [Accessed 22 Jul 2021]. · DOI
  29. 10.1136/bmjgh-2021-007902 · DOI
  30. Kapiriri, 2022, Priority setting and equity in COVID-19 pandemic plans: a comparative analysis of 18 African countries, Heal Pol Plan, 37, 297, 10.1093/heapol/czab113 · DOI
  31. Jensen, 2019, Does the design matter? comparing satellite-based indices for insuring pastoralists against drought, Ecological Economics, 162, 59, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.04.014 · DOI
  32. Vrieling, 2016, Early assessment of seasonal forage availability for mitigating the impact of drought on East African pastoralists, Remote Sens Environ, 174, 44, 10.1016/j.rse.2015.12.003 · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Stein, D., Bergemann, R., Lanthorn, H., Kimani, E., Nshakira-Rukundo, E., & Li, Y.
Affiliations
  • IDinsight (US)
  • Social Science Research Council (US)
  • Institute for Food and Resource Economics, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany
  • University of Bonn (DE)
Venue
BMJ Global Health
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2022-05
Volume
7
Issue
5
Pages
e007747
ISSN
2059-7908 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4280560504
Cited by
29
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 4
FWCI
6.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMJ Global Health (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Elrha Foundation
  • IKEA Foundation
  • The Global Innovation Fund
  • Swedish Postcode Lottery
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Development › Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Child Nutrition and Water Access
  • Social Sciences › Law › Migration, Racism, and Human Rights
Keywords
unconditional cash transfers, refugees, COVID-19 pandemic, food security, psychological well-being, health-seeking behavior, preventive health behavior, South Sudanese refugees
MeSH terms
COVID-19, Family Characteristics, Humans, Refugees, Uganda, Pandemics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review