Cited by 9SARS-CoV-2 detection and testingCOVID-19 epidemiological studiesCOVID-19 Clinical Research Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Evaluating diagnostic tests during outbreaks: challenges and lessons learnt from COVID-19

Open access

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmjgh-2023-012506

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Umemneku Chikere, 2019, Diagnostic test evaluation methodology: A systematic review of methods employed to evaluate diagnostic tests in the absence of gold standard - an update, PLoS One, 14, 10.1371/journal.pone.0223832 · DOI
  2. 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02346-1 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 9

Metadata

Authors
Escadafal, C., Baldan, R., De Vos, M., Ruiz, R. J., Emperador, D. M., Murahwa, A. T., Macé, A., Bausch, D. G., Vessière, A., & Sacks, J. A.
Affiliations
FIND (CH)
Corresponding author
Escadafal, Camille
Venue
BMJ Global Health
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2023-07
Volume
8
Issue
7
Pages
e012506
ISSN
2059-7908 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4383814491
Cited by
9
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1
FWCI
1.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMJ Global Health (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • The government of the Netherlands (MINBUZA-2020.961444)
  • UNITAID (2019-32 FIND-MDR)
  • Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade of Australia (Complex Grant Agreement number 76442)
  • Ministry of Finance - Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (Not specified)
  • Direktion für Entwicklung und Zusammenarbeit (Contract 81066910 amendment 1)
  • KfW Entwicklungsbank (Ref-No. 2020 62 156)
  • World Health Organization (Not specified)
  • Government of the United Kingdom (grant number 300341-102)
  • Department of Foreign Affairs, Trade and Development of Canada (Arrangement No.: 7429348)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 detection and testing
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Modeling and Simulation › COVID-19 epidemiological studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
Keywords
diagnostic test evaluation, outbreak response, COVID-19 pandemic, diagnostic accuracy
MeSH terms
COVID-19, COVID-19 Testing, Diagnostic Tests, Routine, Disease Outbreaks, Humans

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evaluating diagnostic tests during outbreaks: challenges and lessons learnt from COVID-19. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bmjgh-2023-012506
The paper
Escadafal, C., Baldan, R., De Vos, M., Ruiz, R. J., Emperador, D. M., Murahwa, A. T., Macé, A., Bausch, D. G., Vessière, A., & Sacks, J. A. (2023). Evaluating diagnostic tests during outbreaks: challenges and lessons learnt from COVID-19. BMJ Global Health. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2023-012506