Cited by 19Mobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsICT in Developing CommunitiesElectronic Health Records Systems

Perceptions of data processes in mobile-based versus paper-based health information systems for maternal, newborn and child health: a qualitative study in Andhra Pradesh, India

Nguyen, Lillian H, LeFevre, Amnesty E, Jennings, Larissa, Agarwal, Smisha, Mehl, Garrett, Labrique, Alain B, Chava, Lakshmi Durga·2015·BMJ Innovations

Abstract

Background: Many maternal, newborn and child health (MNCH) programmes have paired community health workers with mobile technologies to strengthen the ability of health information systems (HIS) to track women and children across time and beyond the clinical setting. However, little is known regarding the comparative effectiveness of using mobile technologies to enhance HIS data in resource-poor settings. Methods: Focus group discussions were conducted with community health workers called Health Activists (HAs; n=30), Community Organisation Leaders (n=28), HA Trainers (n=21), district and tribal area officials (n=3) and State Officials (n=4). We analysed user perceptions along seven key HIS processes: data collection, transmission, processing, analysis, display, quality checking and feedback. Results: The mobile-based health information system (mHIS) was found to be supportive of the MNCH continuum of care by improving the regularity and timeliness of access to robust data. Respondents noted that data errors were reduced in real time through automated error checking and data processing, which also reduced users’ workloads. The mHIS additionally enabled users to analyse both individual and aggregate data, allowing them to identify specific individuals in need of services or training as well as to identify general trends in service delivery. The system's data display and feedback mechanisms were viewed as improving data use for decision-making. The remaining challenges of the mHIS versus the paper-based HIS included resource, infrastructural and technological barriers that hindered efficient use over time. Conclusions: As compared to paper-based HIS systems, mobile technologies can improve health information processes in resource-poor settings. More efforts are needed to ensure sufficient financial investment, training and use of mHIS data at all levels of the HIS.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmjinnov-2015-000063

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nguyen, L. H., LeFevre, A. E., Jennings, L., Agarwal, S., Mehl, G., Labrique, A. B., & Chava, L. D.
Affiliations
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
  • World Health Organization (CH)
  • Human Development Unit, Society for Elimination of Rural Poverty, Hyderabad, India
Corresponding author
LeFevre, Amnesty E
Venue
BMJ Innovations
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2015-09-30
Volume
1
Issue
4
Pages
167-173
ISSN
  • 2055-642X (ISSN-L)
  • 2055-8074
OpenAlex
W2415340891
Cited by
19
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1
FWCI
2.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
BMJ Innovations (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › ICT in Developing Communities
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
Keywords
mobile health information systems, maternal, newborn and child health, community health workers, user perception, data collection, data quality checks, decision-making, resource-limited settings, Andhra Pradesh

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review