Case studies: a guide for researchers, educators, and implementers
Open accessAbstract
Case study is a widely used but poorly understood research method, conducted differently in different disciplines. This paper explores philosophical, theoretical and methodological issues in case study research and outlines how to conduct one. It offers preliminary guidance for policy makers on how to select and use case studies for learning and decision making. In social science research, a case study is a detailed, contextualised account of a clearly delineated, real world phenomenon, prepared prospectively using mostly qualitative methods. Social science case studies can be of various kinds (eg, theoretical or naturalistic, single or multiple, typical or extreme). A public health case study is a historical account of a health threat and how it was managed. An implementation science case study evaluates the implementation of an intervention (usually retrospectively), combining quantitative assessment against predefined objectives with a narrative of how the project unfolded. Educational case studies present real world topics as stories illustrated by data and prompt students to discuss these from different angles. Impact case studies summarise the societal impact of a research programme. Many accounts described as case studies are overly brief and superficial. The paper concludes with a call to improve the quality and consistency (and hence the usefulness) of case studies.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Crowe, S., Cresswell, K., Robertson, A., Huby, G., Avery, A., & Sheikh, A. (2011) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/1471-2288-11-100 · Cited by 2,697 · see citing works
Miller, S. L., Nazaroff, W. W., Jimenez, J. L., Boerstra, A., Buonanno, G., Dancer, S. J., Kurnitski, J., Marr, L. C., Morawska, L., & Noakes, C. (2021) · Indoor Air · doi:10.1111/ina.12751 · Cited by 734 · see citing works
Case Study Research: Foundations and Methodological Orientations
Harrison, H., Birks, M., Franklin, R., & Mills, J. (2017) · Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research · doi:10.17169/fqs-18.1.2655 · Cited by 678 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Greenhalgh, T.
- Affiliations
- University of Oxford (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Greenhalgh, Trisha
- ORCID
- Greenhalgh, Trisha
- Venue
- BMJ Medicine
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2025-09
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- e001623
- ISSN
- 2754-0413 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC12458855
- OpenAlex
- W4414400896
- Cited by
- 56
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 53 · 2025: 3
- FWCI
- 64.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- BMJ Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Oxford University Research Archive (ORA) (University of Oxford) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Methodology and Impact of Social Science Research
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
- Keywords
- case study research, qualitative research, research design, implementation science, educational case studies, impact case studies, decision-making, policy making, social science research
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review