Cited by 48Global Maternal and Child HealthMaternal and Neonatal HealthcareHealth disparities and outcomes

Socioeconomic inequalities in the rate of stillbirths by cause: a population-based study

Open access
Seaton, Sarah E, Field, David J, Draper, Elizabeth S, Manktelow, Bradley N, Smith, Gordon C S, Springett, Anna, Smith, Lucy K·2012·BMJ Open

Abstract

Objective: To assess time trends in socioeconomic inequalities in overall and cause-specific stillbirth rates in England. Design: Population-based retrospective study. Setting: England. Participants: Stillbirths occurring among singleton infants born between 1 January 2000 and 31 December 2007. Main outcome measure: Cause-specific stillbirth rate per 10 000 births by deprivation tenth and year of birth. Deprivation measured using the UK index of multiple deprivation at Super Output Area level. Methods: Poisson regression models were used to estimate the relative deprivation gap (comparing the most and least deprived tenths) in rates of stillbirths (overall and cause-specific). Excess mortality was calculated by applying the rates seen in the least deprived tenth to the entire population at risk. Discussions with our local NHS multicentre ethics committee deemed that this analysis of national non-identifiable data did not require separate ethics approval. Results: There were 44 stillbirths per 10 000 births, with no evidence of a change in rates over time. Rates were twice as high in the most deprived tenth compared with the least (rate ratio (RR) 2.1, 95% CI 2.0 to 2.2) with no evidence of a change over time. There was a significant deprivation gap for all specific causes except mechanical events (RR 1.2, 95% CI 0.9 to 1.5). The widest gap was seen for stillbirths due to antepartum haemorrhages (RR 3.1, 95% CI 2.8 to 3.5). No evidence of a change in the rate of stillbirth or deprivation gap over time was seen for any specific cause. Conclusion: A wide deprivation gap exists in stillbirth rates for most causes and is not diminishing. Unexplained antepartum stillbirths accounted for 50% of the deprivation gap, and a better understanding of these stillbirths is necessary to reduce socioeconomic inequalities.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001100

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Seaton, S. E., Field, D. J., Draper, E. S., Manktelow, B. N., Smith, G. C. S., Springett, A., & Smith, L. K.
Affiliations
  • University of Leicester (GB)
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
  • University of London (GB)
Corresponding author
Seaton, Sarah E
Venue
BMJ Open
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2012
Volume
2
Issue
3
Pages
e001100
ISSN
2044-6055 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2130222737
Cited by
48
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 6 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • BMJ Open (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Apollo (University of Cambridge) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Leicester Research Archive (University of Leicester) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Leicester Research Archive (University of Leicester) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Apollo (cc-by-nc)
Funders
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research (MET-08-05-101, NIHR-MET-08-05, RP-PG-0407-10029)
  • University of Leicester
  • Programme Grants for Applied Research
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Global Maternal and Child Health
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
Keywords
stillbirth, socioeconomic disparities, antepartum hemorrhage, unexplained stillbirth, temporal trends, excess mortality, singleton pregnancy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review