Cited by 21Global Maternal and Child HealthPublic Health and Social InequalitiesMaternal and Neonatal Healthcare

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Reduction in inequality in antenatal-care use and persistence of inequality in skilled birth attendance in the Philippines from 1993 to 2008

Open access

Abstract

Objective: To assess changes in the inequalities associated with maternal healthcare use according to economic status in the Philippines. Design: An analysis of four population-based data sets that were conducted between 1993 and 2008. Setting: Philippines. Participants: Women aged 15–49 years who had a live-birth within 1 year in 1993 (n=1707), 1998 (n=1513), 2003 (n=1325) and 2008 (n=1209). Outcomes: At least four visits of antenatal care, skilled birth attendance and delivery in a medical facility. Results: The adjusted OR for antenatal-care use when comparing the highest wealth-index quintile with the lowest quintile declined from 1993 to 2008: 3.43 (95% CI 2.22 to 5.28) to 2.87 (95% CI 1.31 to 6.29). On the other hand, the adjusted OR for the other two outcome indicators by the wealth index widened from 1993 to 2008: 9.92 (95% CI 5.98 to 16.43) to 15.53 (95% CI 6.90 to 34.94) for skilled birth attendance and 7.74 (95% CI 4.22 to 14.21) to 16.00 (95% CI 7.99 to 32.02) for delivery in a medical facility. The concentration indices for maternal health utilisation in 1993 and 2008 were 0.19 and 0.09 for antenatal care; 0.26 and 0.24 for skilled birth attendance and 0.41 and 0.35 for delivery in a medical facility. Conclusions: Over a 16-year period, gradients in antenatal-care use decreased and the high level of inequalities in skilled birth attendance and delivery in a medical facility persisted. The results showed a disproportionate use of institutional care at birth among disadvantaged Filipino women.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-002507

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 15

  1. Thomsen, 2011, Promoting equity to achieve maternal and child health, Reprod Health Matters, 19, 176, 10.1016/S0968-8080(11)38586-2 · DOI
  2. 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60113-5 · DOI
  3. Zere, 2012, Inequities in maternal and child health outcomes and interventions in Ghana, BMC Public Health, 12, 252, 10.1186/1471-2458-12-252 · DOI
  4. Wirth, 2008, “Delivering on the mdgs?”: equity and maternal health in Ghana, Ethiopia and Kenya, East Afr J Public Health, 5, 133
  5. O'Donnell O Van Doorslaer E Wagstaff A . Analyzing health equity using household survey data: a guide to techniques and their implementation. Washington, DC: The World Bank, 2008. http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTPAH/Resources/Publications/459843-1195594469249/HealthEquityFINAL.pdf (accessed Jul 2011). · DOI · Paper page
  6. Wagstaff, 2011, The concentration index of a binary outcome revisited, J Health Econ, 20, 1155, 10.1002/hec.1752 · DOI
  7. Limwattananon, 2011, Trends and inequities in where women delivered their babies in 25 low-income countries: evidence from Demographic and Health Surveys, Reprod Health Matters, 19, 75, 10.1016/S0968-8080(11)37564-7 · DOI
  8. Zere, 2011, Inequalities in skilled attendance at birth in Namibia: a decomposition analysis, BMC Pregnancy Childbirth, 11, 34, 10.1186/1471-2393-11-34 · DOI
  9. Collin SM Anwar I Ronsmans C . A decade of inequality in maternity care: antenatal care, professional attendance at delivery, and caesarean section in Bangladesh (1991–2004). Int J Equity Health 2007;6:9. · DOI
  10. 10.1371/journal.pone.0013593 · DOI
  11. 10.1016/S0968-8080(03)02168-2 · DOI
  12. Huntington, 2012, A systems approach to improving maternal health in the Philippines, Bull World Health Organ, 90, 104, 10.2471/BLT.11.092825 · DOI
  13. 10.1016/j.healthpol.2009.02.009 · DOI
  14. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.04.013 · DOI
  15. 10.1016/j.ijgo.2010.06.020 · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Molina, H. F., Nakamura, K., Kizuki, M., & Seino, K.
Affiliations
Tokyo Medical and Dental University (JP)
Corresponding author
Nakamura, Keiko
Venue
BMJ Open
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2013
Volume
3
Issue
6
Pages
e002507
ISSN
2044-6055 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2146664769
Cited by
21
References
2
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1
FWCI
1.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • BMJ Open (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (24390164)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Global Maternal and Child Health
  • Social Sciences › Health › Public Health and Social Inequalities
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
Keywords
maternal health inequalities, prenatal care, skilled birth attendance, institutional delivery, wealth index, socioeconomic status, concentration index, Philippines

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review