Cited by 44Electronic Health Records SystemsHealth Literacy and Information AccessibilityHealth, Technology, Consumer Behavior

Perceptions of chronically ill and healthy consumers about electronic personal health records: a comparative empirical investigation

Open access
Cocosila, Mihail, Archer, Norm·2014·BMJ Open

Abstract

Objective: To develop a model of consumer perceptions of electronic personal health records (PHRs) and validate it in a comparative study between consumers who report having a chronic illness and those who report being well. Materials and methods: A model of PHR use motivators and barriers was built and tested through a national survey across Canada. Data were collected from 800 individuals, 18 years or older. Half reported having a chronic illness or disability and half reported being well. Analyses were performed with structural equation modelling techniques. Results: A total of 389 answers from chronically ill and 383 from well participants were collected. Perceived usefulness was the key explanation of the intention to use PHRs for both ill and well people (total effect of 0.601 and 0.565, respectively) followed by security, privacy and trust in PHRs (total effect of 0.377 and 0.479, respectively). Conversely, computer anxiety was perceived as a significant barrier (total effect of −0.327 for ill individuals and −0.212 for well individuals). Discussion: The model proposed was appropriate in explaining key consumer positive and negative perceptions on electronic PHR use. We found little difference in perceptions of electronic PHRs between chronically ill and well individuals, although self-reporting their health status might have influenced the results. Conclusions: To increase the adoption rate of electronic PHRs among both chronically ill and well consumers it is necessary to reinforce consumer perceptions of the usefulness of and trust in these eHealth technologies while mitigating their anxieties about computer use in general.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005304

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In telemedicine, trust has been found to be an important antecedent of patient acceptance, patients' and healthy persons' thoughts on the usefulness of a personal health record, and physicians' intention to use a telemedicine service.

    “This is also the case for telemedicine, where trust has been found to be an important antecedent of patient acceptance [4], patients’ and healthy persons’ thoughts on the usefulness of a personal health record [5], and physicians’ intention to use a telemedicine service [6].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 44 · Cited by 44

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [35]Thomas RD Lu IRR Cedzynski M Partial least squares: a critical review and a potential alternative. 2005 Administrative Sciences Association of Canada Conference, Toronto, Ontario, Canada http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.86.1719&rep=rep1&type=pdf (accessed 28 Oct 2013). (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/6Ki8UyHTh).

Authors
Cocosila, M., & Archer, N.
Affiliations
  • Athabasca University (CA)
  • McMaster University (CA)
Corresponding author
Cocosila, Mihail
Venue
BMJ Open
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2014-07
Volume
4
Issue
7
Pages
e005304
ISSN
2044-6055 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2165912169
Cited by
44
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1
FWCI
4.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • BMJ Open (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Funders
Canadian Institutes of Health Research
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Health, Technology, Consumer Behavior
Keywords
electronic personal health records, consumer perception, chronic disease, perceived usefulness, privacy and security, computer anxiety, digital health adoption, health information technology adoption
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Attitude, Chronic Disease, Consumer Behavior, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Models, Theoretical, Motivation, Empirical Research, Young Adult, Electronic Health Records

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review