The contribution of primary prevention medication and dietary change in coronary mortality reduction in England between 2000 and 2007: a modelling study
Open accessAbstract
Objective: To analyse the falls in coronary heart disease (CHD) mortality in England between 2000 and 2007 and quantify the relative contributions from preventive medications and population-wide changes in blood pressure (BP) and cholesterol levels, particularly by exploring socioeconomic inequalities. Design: A modelling study. Setting: Sources of data included controlled trials and meta-analyses, national surveys and official statistics. Participants: English population aged 25+ in 2000–2007. Main outcome measures: Number of deaths prevented or postponed (DPPs) in 2007 by socioeconomic status. We used the IMPACT SEC model which applies the relative risk reduction quantified in previous randomised controlled trials and meta-analyses to partition the mortality reduction among specific treatments and risk factor changes. Results: Between 2000 and 2007, approximately 20 400 DPPs were attributable to reductions in BP and cholesterol in the English population. The substantial decline in BP was responsible for approximately 13 000 DPPs. Approximately 1800 DPPs came from medications and some 11 200 DPPs from population-wide changes. Reduction in population BP prevented almost twofold more deaths in the most deprived quintile compared with the most affluent. Reduction in cholesterol resulted in approximately 7400 DPPs; approximately 5300 DPPs were attributable to statin use and approximately 2100 DPPs to population-wide changes. Statins prevented almost 50% more deaths in the most affluent quintile compared with the most deprived. Conversely, population-wide changes in cholesterol prevented threefold more deaths in the most deprived quintile compared with the most affluent. Conclusions: Population-wide secular changes in systolic blood pressure (SBP) and cholesterol levels helped to substantially reduce CHD mortality and the associated socioeconomic disparities. Mortality reductions were, in absolute terms, greatest in the most deprived quintiles, mainly reflecting their bigger initial burden of disease. Statins for high-risk individuals also made an important contribution but maintained socioeconomic inequalities. Our results strengthen the case for greater emphasis on preventive approaches, particularly population-based policies to reduce SBP and cholesterol.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Population strategies to address diet, such as economic incentives, can reduce socioeconomic-related disparities in health.
“In addition, population strategies to address diet, such as economic incentives, can reduce socioeconomic-related disparities in health, whereas individual-based approaches may exacerbate inequities.98, 99”
From Dietary and Policy Priorities for Cardiovascular Disease, Diabetes, and Obesity: A Comprehensive Review (2016) · cites this paper as [99]
Individual-based approaches may exacerbate inequities.
“In addition, population strategies to address diet, such as economic incentives, can reduce socioeconomic-related disparities in health, whereas individual-based approaches may exacerbate inequities.98, 99”
From Dietary and Policy Priorities for Cardiovascular Disease, Diabetes, and Obesity: A Comprehensive Review (2016) · cites this paper as [99]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Projected effect of dietary salt reductions on future cardiovascular disease
Bibbins-Domingo, K., Chertow, G. M., Coxson, P. G., Moran, A., Lightwood, J. M., Pletcher, M. J., & Goldman, L. (2010) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa0907355 · Cited by 1,253 · see citing works
Rapid mortality falls after risk-factor changes in populations
Capewell, S., & O'Flaherty, M. (2011) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(10)62302-1 · Cited by 149 · see citing works
Self-citationEffective tobacco control is key to rapid progress in reduction of non-communicable diseases
Glantz, S., & Gonzalez, M. (2012) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(11)60615-6 · Cited by 99 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Mozaffarian, D. (2016) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.115.018585 · Cited by 2,216 · see citing works
“In addition, population strategies to address diet, such as economic incentives, can reduce socioeconomic-related disparities in health, whereas individual-based approaches may exacerbate inequities.(98,99) Evidence-based personalized approaches, especially related to underlying nongenetic characteristics, should be c…”
- Authors
- Guzman-Castillo, M., Ahmed, R., Hawkins, N., Scholes, S., Wilkinson, E., Lucy, J., Capewell, S., & O'Flaherty, M.
- Affiliations
- University of Liverpool (GB)
- University of British Columbia (CA)
- University College London (GB)
- University of Chester (GB)
- Public Health Wales (GB)
- Department of Public Health and Policy, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
- Corresponding author
- Guzman-Castillo, M
- Venue
- BMJ Open
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2015-01
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- e006070
- ISSN
- 2044-6055 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC4316419
- OpenAlex
- W2168915121
- Cited by
- 25
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4
- FWCI
- 4.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Update notices
- correction (2015-04-13)
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by-nc
- Locations
- BMJ Open (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute for Health and Care Research (SPHR-LIL-PH1-MCD)
- School for Public Health Research
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Health Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Healthcare Systems and Public Health
- Keywords
- coronary heart disease mortality, primary prevention, statins, blood pressure reduction, cholesterol levels, socioeconomic disparities, mortality reduction, cardiovascular risk factors, England
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Antihypertensive Agents, Blood Pressure, Cholesterol, Coronary Disease, England, Female, Humans, Hypertension, Male, Middle Aged, Primary Prevention, Risk Factors, Sex Factors, Socioeconomic Factors, Models, Statistical, Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review