Cited by 24Global Maternal and Child HealthReproductive Health and ContraceptionHealth and Conflict Studies

Relationship between implementing interpersonal communication and mass education campaigns in emergency settings and use of reproductive healthcare services: evidence from Darfur, Sudan

Open access
Adam, Izzeldin Fadl, Nakamura, Keiko, Kizuki, Masashi, Al Rifai, Rami, Vanching, Urnaa·2015·BMJ Open

Abstract

Objectives: (1) To examine changes in women's awareness and utilisation of reproductive healthcare services in emergency settings following provision of interpersonal communication (IPC) and mass education campaigns, and (2) to describe factors associated with reproductive healthcare service use in internally displaced person (IDP) camps. Setting: Three camps containing 88 984 IDPs in Darfur, Sudan. Participants: 640 women aged 15−49 who had experienced pregnancy in the camp during the previous 2 years were enrolled in each of two independent cross-sectional surveys 26 months apart. Interventions: IPC and mass education campaigns where community health workers disseminated information by home/shelter visits, clinic sessions, public meetings and other means to raise awareness and promote reproductive healthcare service use. Primary outcome measures: Awareness of the existence of antenatal care (ANC) and tetanus toxoid (TT) vaccination services, reception of ANC and TT vaccination, place of delivery and use of postnatal care (PNC). Results: The percentage of women who received home visits, and attended in-clinic sessions and public meetings increased from 61.6% to 86.7%, from 43.0% to 68.8%, and from 3.8% to 39.8%, respectively, between the initial and follow-up surveys. More women were aware of ANC (OR 18.6, 95% CI 13.1 to 26.5) and TT vaccination (OR 3.2, 95% CI 2.4 to 4.4) in the follow-up than the initial survey, after multivariable adjustment. More women received ≥3 ANC visits (OR 8.8, 95% CI 6.4 to 12.0) and ≥3 doses of TT (OR 2.5, 95% CI 1.9 to 3.3), delivered at a healthcare facility (OR 5.4, 95% CI 4.0 to 7.4) and received a PNC visit (OR 5.5, 95% CI 4.0 to 7.7) in the follow-up than in the initial survey, after multivariable adjustment. Conclusions: Awareness about and utilisation of reproductive healthcare services were higher in the follow-up survey. An integrated IPC and mass education campaign is effective for improving women's reproductive health in emergency settings.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008285

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 24

  1. [1]Hakamies N, Geissler PW, Borchert M Providing reproductive health care to internally displaced persons: barriers experienced by humanitarian agencies. Reprod Health Matters 2008; 16: 33– 43. 10.1016/S0968-8080(08)31349-4 18513605 · DOI
  2. [5]Patel SH, Muyinda H, Sewankambo NK In the face of war: examining sexual vulnerabilities of Acholi adolescent girls living in displacement camps in conflict-affected Northern Uganda. BMC Int Health Hum Rights 2012; 12: 38 10.1186/1472-698X-12-38 23270488 PMC3536565 · DOI
  3. [6]Onyango MA, Hixson BL, McNally S, et al Minimum Initial Service Package (MISP) for reproductive health during emergencies: time for a new paradigm? Glob Public Health 2013; 8: 342– 56. 10.1080/17441692.2013.765024 23394618 · DOI
  4. [7]Inter-agency Working Group on Reproductive Health in Crises. Inter-agency Field Manual on Reproductive Health in Humanitarian Settings. World Health Organization, 2010 http://www.searo.who.int/entity/emergencies/documents/field_manual_rh_humanitarian_settings.pdf (accessed 25 Feb 2014). 26203479
  5. [9]Chi PC, Bulage P, Urdal H Perceptions of the effects of armed conflict on maternal and reproductive health services and outcomes in Burundi and Northern Uganda: a qualitative study. BMC Int Health Hum Rights 2015; 15: 7 10.1186/s12914-015-0045-z 25884930 PMC4392810 · DOI
  6. [10]Haggaz AD, Radi EA, Adam I High perinatal mortality in Darfur, Sudan. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2008; 21: 277 10.1080/14767050801928143 18330826 · DOI
  7. [11]Haggaz A, Ahmed S, Adam I Use of prenatal care services in Darfur, Sudan. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2008; 103: 252– 3. 10.1016/j.ijgo.2008.06.010 18755457 · DOI
  8. [12]Ibnouf AH, van den Borne HW, Maarse JA Utilization of antenatal care services by Sudanese women in their reproductive age. Saudi Med J 2007; 28: 737– 43. 17457442
  9. [14]Depoortere E, Checchi F, Broillet F Violence and mortality in West Darfur, Sudan (2003–04): epidemiological evidence from four surveys. Lancet 2004; 364: 1315– 20. 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)17187-0 15474133 · DOI
  10. [15]Degomme O, Guha-Sapir D Patterns of mortality rates in Darfur conflict. Lancet 2010; 375: 294– 300. 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61967-X 20109956 · DOI
  11. [18]Nsongurua JU When neutrality is a sin: the Darfur crisis and the crisis of humanitarian intervention in Sudan. Hum Rights Q 2005; 27: 1149– 99. 10.1353/hrq.2005.0055 · DOI
  12. [19]Ibrahim IM The traditional mechanisms of conflict resolution and peace building in Darfur; from an anthropological perspective. Mediterr J Soc Sci 2013; 4: 132– 40.
  13. [21]Beaulieu MD, Haggerty JL, Beaulieu C Interpersonal communication from the patient perspective: comparison of primary healthcare evaluation instruments. Healthc Policy 2011; 7: 108– 23. 23205039 PMC3399440
  14. [27]World Health Organization (WHO). WHO Recommendations on Postnatal Care of the Mother and Newborn. Geneva: WHO, 2013. 24624481
  15. [29]Fekede B, Mariam A Antenatal care services utilization and factors associated in Jimma Town (south west Ethiopia). Ethiop Med J 2007; 45: 123– 33. 17642168
  16. [30]Abosse Z, Woldie M, Ololo S Factors influencing antenatal care service utilization in Hadiya zone. Ethiop J Health Sci 2010; 20: 75– 82. 22434964 PMC3275839
  17. [32]von Roenne A, von Roenne F, Kollie S Reproductive health services for refugees by refugees: an example from Guinea. Disasters 2010; 34: 16– 29. 10.1111/j.1467-7717.2009.01112.x 19459901 · DOI · Paper page
  18. [33]Shahrawat R, Joon V Role of interpersonal communication in infant and young child feeding practices in an urban slum: an overview based on case studies. Indian J Pediatr 2013; 80: 1041– 6. 10.1007/s12098-012-0894-6 23180400 · DOI
  19. [34]Fullerton JT, Killian R, Gass PM Outcomes of a community-and home-based intervention for safe motherhood and newborn care. Health Care Women Int 2005; 26: 561– 76. 10.1080/07399330591004881 16126600 · DOI
  20. [35]Blondel B, Bréart G Home visits during pregnancy: consequences on pregnancy outcome use of health services, and women's situations. Semin Perinatol 1995; 19: 263– 71. 10.1016/S0146-0005(05)80040-0 8560291 · DOI
  21. [36]Barlow A, Mullany B, Neault N Effect of a paraprofessional home-visiting intervention on American Indian teen mothers’ and infants’ behavioral risks: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Psychiatry 2013; 170: 83– 93. 10.1176/appi.ajp.2012.12010121 23409290 PMC4542092 · DOI
  22. [38]Agus Y, Horiuchi S Factors influencing the use of antenatal care in rural West Sumatra, Indonesia. BMC Preg Childbirth 2012; 12: 9 10.1186/1471-2393-12-9 PMC3298506 22353252 · DOI
  23. [39]Ochako R, Fotso JC, Ikamari L Utilization of maternal health services among young women in Kenya: insights from the Kenya Demographic and Health Survey, 2003. BMC Preg Childbirth 2011; 11: 1 10.1186/1471-2393-11-1 PMC3022772 21214960 · DOI
  24. [40]Tey NP, Lai SL Correlates of and barriers to the utilization of health services for delivery in South Asia and Sub-Saharan Africa. Scientific World Journal 2013; 2013: 423403 10.1155/2013/423403 24288482 PMC3830882 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Adam, I. F., Nakamura, K., Kizuki, M., Al Rifai, R., & Vanching, U.
Affiliations
  • Tokyo Medical and Dental University (JP)
  • Department of International Health and Medicine, Division of Public Health, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
Corresponding author
Nakamura, Keiko
Venue
BMJ Open
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2015-09
Volume
5
Issue
9
Pages
e008285
ISSN
2044-6055 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2172277631
Cited by
24
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3
FWCI
1.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • BMJ Open (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (26305022)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Global Maternal and Child Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Health and Contraception
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health and Conflict Studies
Keywords
interpersonal communication, internally displaced persons, emergency situations, prenatal care, tetanus vaccination, postpartum care, place of delivery, community health workers, home visits, women's health awareness, access to maternal health services, Darfur conflict
MeSH terms
Adult, Ambulatory Care Facilities, Communication, Community Health Services, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Health Services Accessibility, Humans, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Pregnancy, Prenatal Care, Sudan, Reproductive Health Services

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review