The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Continuity of care with doctors—a matter of life and death? A systematic review of continuity of care and mortality
Open accessAbstract
Objective: Continuity of care is a long-standing feature of healthcare, especially of general practice. It is associated with increased patient satisfaction, increased take-up of health promotion, greater adherence to medical advice and decreased use of hospital services. This review aims to examine whether there is a relationship between the receipt of continuity of doctor care and mortality. Design: Systematic review without meta-analysis. Data sources: MEDLINE, Embase and the Web of Science, from 1996 to 2017. Eligibility criteria for selecting studies: Peer-reviewed primary research articles, published in English which reported measured continuity of care received by patients from any kind of doctor, in any setting, in any country, related to measured mortality of those patients. Results: Of the 726 articles identified in searches, 22 fulfilled the eligibility criteria. The studies were all cohort or cross-sectional and most adjusted for multiple potential confounding factors. These studies came from nine countries with very different cultures and health systems. We found such heterogeneity of continuity and mortality measurement methods and time frames that it was not possible to combine the results of studies. However, 18 (81.8%) high-quality studies reported statistically significant reductions in mortality, with increased continuity of care. 16 of these were with all-cause mortality. Three others showed no association and one demonstrated mixed results. These significant protective effects occurred with both generalist and specialist doctors. Conclusions: This first systematic review reveals that increased continuity of care by doctors is associated with lower mortality rates. Although all the evidence is observational, patients across cultural boundaries appear to benefit from continuity of care with both generalist and specialist doctors. Many of these articles called for continuity to be given a higher priority in healthcare planning. Despite substantial, successive, technical advances in medicine, interpersonal factors remain important. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42016042091.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Environment and Disease: Association or Causation?
Hill, A. B. (1965) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine · doi:10.1177/003591576505800503 · Cited by 6,974
The association between continuity of care and outcomes: a systematic and critical review
Van Walraven, C., Oake, N., Jennings, A., & Forster, A. J. (2010) · Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2753.2009.01235.x · Cited by 644
Mental health service delivery and suicide risk: the role of individual patient and facility factors
Desai, R. A., Dausey, D. J., & Rosenheck, R. A. (2005) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.162.2.311 · Cited by 183
The ‘Know Your Midwife’ scheme—a randomised trial of continuity of care by a team of midwives
Flint, C., Poulengeris, P., & Grant, A. (1989) · Midwifery · doi:10.1016/s0266-6138(89)80059-2 · Cited by 160
Cited by
Discrimination and Medical Mistrust in a Racially and Ethnically Diverse Sample of California Adults
Bazargan, M., Cobb, S., & Assari, S. (2021) · The Annals of Family Medicine · doi:10.1370/afm.2632 · Cited by 404
Sandvik, H., Hetlevik, Ø., Blinkenberg, J., & Hunskaar, S. (2022) · British Journal of General Practice · doi:10.3399/bjgp.2021.0340 · Cited by 333
Primary medical care continuity and patient mortality: a systematic review
Baker, R., Freeman, G. K., Haggerty, J. L., Bankart, M. J., & Nockels, K. H. (2020) · British Journal of General Practice · doi:10.3399/bjgp20x712289 · Cited by 331
Interventions for health workforce retention in rural and remote areas: a systematic review
Russell, D., Mathew, S., Fitts, M., Liddle, Z., Murakami-Gold, L., Campbell, N., Ramjan, M., Zhao, Y., Hines, S., Humphreys, J. S., et al. (2021) · Human Resources for Health · doi:10.1186/s12960-021-00643-7 · Cited by 268
Midwife continuity of care models versus other models of care for childbearing women
Sandall, J., Fernandez Turienzo, C., Devane, D., Soltani, H., Gillespie, P., Gates, S., Jones, L. V., Shennan, A. H., & Rayment-Jones, H. (2024) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd004667.pub6 · Cited by 192
Metadata
- Authors
- Pereira Gray, D. J., Sidaway-Lee, K., White, E., Thorne, A., & Evans, P. H.
- Venue
- BMJ Open
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2018-06
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- e021161
- ISSN
- 2044-6055 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2811105518
- Cited by
- 759
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 15.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Continuity of care with doctors—a matter of life and death? A systematic review of continuity of care and mortality. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-021161
- The paper
- Pereira Gray, D. J., Sidaway-Lee, K., White, E., Thorne, A., & Evans, P. H. (2018). Continuity of care with doctors—a matter of life and death? A systematic review of continuity of care and mortality. BMJ Open. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-021161
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.