Cited by 45

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Relationship between high-sensitivity C reactive protein and the risk of gallstone disease: results from the Kailuan cohort study

Liu, Tong, Siyin, Sarah Tan, Yao, Nan, Duan, Ning, Xu, Guoshuai, Li, Wenqiang, Qu, Jun, Liu, Siqing·2020·BMJ Open

Abstract

Objectives: Gallstone disease (GSD) can be caused by various health and clinical factors such as obesity, dyslipidaemia and an unhealthy diet, all of which are associated with higher high-sensitivity C reactive protein (hs-CRP) concentrations. Whether hs-CRP represents an independent risk factor for GSD is still unclear. We prospectively investigated hs-CRP in relation to the occurrence of GSD based on the Kailuan study. Study design: Prospective cohort study. Setting: The Kailuan cohort study was conducted in Tangshan City in northern China. Participants: 95 319 participants who were free from GSD were recruited in this study. Epidemiological data, anthropometric parameters and biochemical data of participants were collected. Primary and secondary outcome measures: Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to evaluate the association between hs-CRP concentrations and the risk of GSD after adjustments for potential confounders. Results: During the mean 7.58 years of follow-up among 95 319 participants, 4205 participants were identified as newly diagnosed with GSD or having undergone cholecystectomy for cholelithiasis. Compared with the hs-CRP<1 mg/L group, elevated hs-CRP concentrations were significantly associated with higher risk of GSD with the corresponding HR of 1.11 (95% CI 1.03 to 1.19), 1.12 (95% CI 1.04 to 1.22) in the 1≤hs-CRP≤3 mg/L and hs-CRP>3 mg/L group, respectively. The multivariate model which included hs-CRP not only had a better line of fitness but also had better predictive values to help identify new cases of GSD during follow-up. Conclusion: Elevated hs-CRP concentration is an independent risk factor for new-onset GSD among the Chinese population. Trial registration number: ChiCTR-TNC-11001489.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035880

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Increased body weight is associated with reduced gallbladder motility, which contributes to stone production.

    “Increased body weight is additionally associated with reduced gallbladder motility, another factor that contributes to stone production [21].”

    From Excess Body Weight and Gallstone Disease (2021) · cites this paper as [21]

    The Discussion (page not provided) says obesity is closely related to stone formation and that increased gallbladder wall thickness may reduce motility. It links the possible motility reduction to gallbladder inflammation, however, not to increased body weight; it also presents that mechanism as uncertain. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 45

  1. 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00723.x · DOI
  2. 10.1080/00365529850172601 · DOI
  3. 10.1111/j.1572-0241.1999.00787.x · DOI
  4. Salinas, 2004, Prevalence and risk factors for gallstone disease, Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech, 14, 250, 10.1097/00129689-200410000-00003 · DOI
  5. 10.1016/S0016-5085(99)70456-7 · DOI
  6. 10.1053/j.gastro.2008.12.015 · DOI
  7. 10.1053/j.gastro.2010.10.060 · DOI
  8. Shabanzadeh, 2017, Gallstone disease and mortality: a cohort study, Int J Public Health, 62, 353, 10.1007/s00038-016-0916-7 · DOI
  9. 10.1053/j.gastro.2015.09.002 · DOI
  10. 10.1002/hep.1840210309 · DOI
  11. 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2009.06146.x · DOI
  12. Shabanzadeh, 2018, Incidence of gallstone disease and complications, Curr Opin Gastroenterol, 34, 81, 10.1097/MOG.0000000000000418 · DOI
  13. 10.1053/jhep.2002.33336 · DOI
  14. 10.1016/j.gtc.2010.02.003 · DOI
  15. 10.1002/hep.20654 · DOI
  16. 10.1001/jama.295.13.1549 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Yucel, 2014, C-Reactive protein vs. high - sensitivity C - reactive protein: what is the difference?, Turkish Journal of Biochemistry, 39, 43, 10.5505/tjb.2014.92408 · DOI
  18. 10.5551/jat.13599 · DOI
  19. Shafi Dar, 2010, hs-CRP: a potential marker for hypertension in Kashmiri population, Indian J Clin Biochem, 25, 208, 10.1007/s12291-010-0037-7 · DOI
  20. Marques-Vidal, 2012, Association between inflammatory and obesity markers in a Swiss population-based sample (CoLaus study), Obes Facts, 5, 734, 10.1159/000345045 · DOI
  21. Zhu, 2011, Fruit consumption is associated with lower carotid intima-media thickness and C-reactive protein levels in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, J Am Diet Assoc, 111, 1536, 10.1016/j.jada.2011.07.010 · DOI
  22. 10.1007/BF03256418 · DOI
  23. Rojo-Martínez, 2013, Factors determining high-sensitivity C-reactive protein values in the Spanish population. Di@bet.es study, Eur J Clin Invest, 43, 1, 10.1111/eci.12002 · DOI
  24. Belfki, 2012, Relationship of C-reactive protein with components of the metabolic syndrome in a Tunisian population, Eur J Intern Med, 23, e5, 10.1016/j.ejim.2011.10.011 · DOI
  25. Yu, 2017, Association of cumulative exposure to resting heart rate with risk of stroke in general population: the Kailuan cohort study, J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis, 26, 2501, 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2017.05.037 · DOI
  26. 10.1111/ene.12580 · DOI
  27. 10.1093/ije/dyv079 · DOI
  28. Liu, 2018, Association between different combination of measures for obesity and new-onset gallstone disease, PLoS One, 13, 10.1371/journal.pone.0196457 · DOI
  29. 10.1161/01.CIR.0000052939.59093.45 · DOI · Paper page
  30. Festi D , Barbara L , Frabboni R , et al . Prevalence and incidence of gallstone disease: the Sirmione study[J]. Recent Advances in the Epidemiology and Prevention of Gallstone Disease 1991:7–11. · DOI
  31. 10.1002/bjs.6687 · DOI
  32. Zhu, 2014, Prevalence of and risk factors for gallstones in Uighur and Han Chinese, World J Gastroenterol, 20, 14942, 10.3748/wjg.v20.i40.14942 · DOI
  33. Chen, 2014, Clinical predictors of incident gallstone disease in a Chinese population in Taipei, Taiwan, BMC Gastroenterol, 14, 10.1186/1471-230X-14-83 · DOI
  34. Yamashita, 1988, Composition of intrahepatic calculi. etiological significance, Dig Dis Sci, 33, 10.1007/BF01536030 · DOI
  35. 10.3748/wjg.15.1886 · DOI
  36. 10.1016/j.bpg.2006.05.004 · DOI
  37. Cozma, 2009, Endothelial dysfunction in metabolic syndrome, Rom J Intern Med, 47, 133
  38. Shabanzadeh, 2017, Metabolic biomarkers and gallstone disease - a population-based study, Scand J Gastroenterol, 52, 1270, 10.1080/00365521.2017.1365166 · DOI
  39. Pak, 2016, Risk factors for cholelithiasis, Gastroenterol Nurs, 39, 297, 10.1097/SGA.0000000000000235 · DOI
  40. 10.1148/106.1.29 · DOI
  41. 10.1006/jsre.1997.5213 · DOI
  42. 10.1194/jlr.M500180-JLR200 · DOI
  43. Jørgensen, 1987, Prevalence of gallstones in a Danish population, Am J Epidemiol, 126, 912, 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a114728 · DOI
  44. Jensen, 1991, Incidence of gallstones in a Danish population, Gastroenterology, 100, 790, 10.1016/0016-5085(91)80027-7 · DOI
  45. 10.1007/s10620-006-9107-3 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Liu, T., Siyin, S. T., Yao, N., Duan, N., Xu, G., Li, W., Qu, J., & Liu, S.
Venue
BMJ Open
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2020-09
Volume
10
Issue
9
Pages
e035880
ISSN
2044-6055
Cited by
45
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review