Loneliness among older adults in the community during COVID-19: A cross-sectional survey in Canada
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Abstract Objective Physical distancing and stay-at-home measures implemented to slow transmission of novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) may intensify feelings of loneliness in older adults, especially those living alone. Our aim was to characterize the extent of loneliness in a sample of older adults living in the community and assess characteristics associated with loneliness. Design Online cross-sectional survey between May 6 and May 19, 2020 Setting Ontario, Canada Participants Convenience sample of the members of a national retired educators’ organization. Primary outcome measures Self-reported loneliness, including differences between women and men. Results 4879 respondents (71.0% women; 67.4% 65-79 years) reported that in the preceding week, 43.1% felt lonely at least some of the time, including 8.3% that felt lonely always or often. Women had increased odds of loneliness compared to men, whether living alone (adjusted Odds Ratio (aOR) 1.52 [95% Confidence Interval (CI) 1.13-2.04]) or with others (2.44 [95% CI 2.04-2.92]). Increasing age group decreased the odds of loneliness (aOR 0.69 [95% CI 0.59-0.81] 65-79 years and 0.50 [95% CI 0.39-0.65] 80+ years compared to <65 years). Living alone was associated with loneliness, with a greater association in men (aOR 4.26 [95% CI 3.15-5.76]) than women (aOR 2.65 [95% CI 2.26-3.11]). Other factors associated with loneliness included: fair or poor health (aOR 1.93 [95% CI 1.54-2.41]), being a caregiver (aOR 1.18 [95% CI 1.02-1.37]), receiving care (aOR 1.47 [95% CI 1.19-1.81]), high concern for the pandemic (aOR 1.55 [95% CI 1.31-1.84]), not experiencing positive effects of pandemic distancing measures (aOR 1.94 [95% CI 1.62-2.32]), and changes to daily routine (aOR 2.81 [95% CI 1.96-4.03]). Conclusions While many older adults reported feeling lonely during COVID-19, several characteristics – such as being female and living alone – increased the odds of loneliness. These characteristics may help identify priorities for targeting interventions to reduce loneliness. Strengths and limitations of this study This survey study leveraged a strong community-based partnership to obtain timely data from a large sample of older Canadians on the impacts of COVID-19. This study identified several characteristics that increased the odds of loneliness, which may help to identify priorities for targeted interventions to reduce loneliness. The data were based on a convenience sample of retired, educational staff, who are not fully representative of the Canadian population. The perspectives of vulnerable groups who may be at greater risk for loneliness (e.g. those with severe mental health illness, low income, no home internet access, etc.) are likely underrepresented in this sample.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
One Canadian study found that 43.1% of older adults had experienced loneliness at least some of the time in the preceding week.
“One Canadian study exploring loneliness amongst community-dwelling older adults found that 43.1% of older adults had experienced loneliness at least some of the time in the preceding week [11].”
From The Psychosocial Impact of COVID-19 on Older Adults with Cancer: A Rapid Review (2022) · cites this paper as [11]
Factors associated with increased loneliness included having fair or poor health, changes to daily routine, and having a high concern for the pandemic.
“Factors associated with increased loneliness included having fair or poor health, changes to daily routine, and having a high concern for the pandemic [11].”
From The Psychosocial Impact of COVID-19 on Older Adults with Cancer: A Rapid Review (2022) · cites this paper as [11]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 61 · Cited by 131
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- *Adjusted for all covariates listed in the table with an interaction term for sex and living alone (p=0.006). on August 30, 2024 by guest. Protected by copyright. http://bmjopen.bmj.com/ BMJ Open: first published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044517 on 2 April 2021. Downloaded from REFERENCES
- National Academies of Sciences Engineering and Medicine. Social isolation and loneliness in older adults: opportunities for the health care system. in. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2020.
- Bott NT, Sheckter CC, Milstein AS. women's health, and gender equity: The value of well-timed caregiver support. JAMA Neurology 2017;74:757-8.
- Authors
- Savage, R. D., Wu, W., Li, J., Lawson, A., Bronskill, S. E., Chamberlain, S. A., Grieve, J., Gruneir, A., Reppas-Rindlisbacher, C., Stall, N. M., & Rochon, P. A.
- Affiliations
- Women's College Hospital (CA)
- University of Toronto (CA)
- University of Alberta (CA)
- Entente Foundation (CA)
- Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Corresponding author
- Rochon, Paula A
- ORCID
- Venue
- BMJ Open
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2021-04
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- e044517
- ISSN
- 2044-6055 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC8023743
- OpenAlex
- W3144111934
- Cited by
- 131
- References
- 61
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 44 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 18.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- BMJ Open (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- medRxiv (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- University of Toronto
- Canadian Institutes of Health Research (158218_1)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
- Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Aging, Health, and Disability
- Keywords
- loneliness, older adults, COVID-19 pandemic, social distancing, living alone, gender differences, social isolation, caregiver burden, health status, community-dwelling older adults
- MeSH terms
- COVID-19, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Loneliness, Male, Ontario, Pandemics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review