Cited by 19Food Safety and HygieneSalmonella and Campylobacter epidemiologyFood Security and Health in Diverse Populations

Food handlers’ knowledge, attitudes and self-reported practices regarding safe food handling in charitable food assistance programmes in the eThekwini District, South Africa: cross-sectional study

Open access
Makhunga, Sizwe Earl, Macherera, Margaret, Hlongwana, Khumbulani·2023·BMJ Open

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to assess food handlers’ knowledge, attitudes and self-reported practices towards safer donated foods. Design: This cross-sectional study was conducted from January to May 2021. Setting: This study was conducted in the eThekwini District, South Africa. Participants: A convenience sampling-based cross-sectional survey of food handlers (n=252) served as the study’s main source of data. A total of eight study sites across five municipal planning regions of eThekwini District were visited. The principal investigator administered the validated structured standardised questionnaire, using participants’ language of choice, which was either English or isiZulu. All the questions in the questionnaire were asked in exactly the same manner, following the same flow, in order to avoid bias and ensure consistency. Furthermore, the close-ended nature of questions in the questionnaire mitigated the risks of question manipulation. The questionnaire was adapted from the WHO’s five keys to a safer food manual. Primary and secondary outcome measures: The primary outcome was the knowledge, attitudes and self-reported practices towards safer donated foods. The secondary outcomes were the sanitary conditions of infrastructure and facilities, food handlers’ observed food handling behaviour and nutritional information/labelling. Results: The results show that the food handlers had good knowledge, positive attitude and acceptable behaviours towards safe food handling and general hygiene, with mean scores (SD) of 62.8 (14.6), 92.5 (14.1) and 80.4 (13.3), respectively. Significant correlations were found between knowledge and attitudes (p=0001), knowledge and practices (p<0001), and attitudes and practices (p=0.02). However, the correlations between knowledge versus attitude and attitude versus practice were poor (Spearman’s r<0.3), and the association between knowledge versus practice was moderate (0.3–0.7). The majority of food handlers (92.5%) did not understand the value of thorough cooking and temperature control. About 53% of respondents acknowledged to never adequately reheating cooked meals, 5% did not see the significance of preventing cross-contamination and 5% were unsure. Conclusions: Despite the relatively positive knowledge, attitude and practice levels of the food handlers, safe food handling and hygiene practices, such as thorough cooking and temperature control, properly reheating cooked meals and taking precautions to prevent cross-contamination, require some emphasis.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065357

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

11 of the 40 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. [7]Ramalwa N, Page N, Smith A, et al. Has foodborne disease outbreak notification and investigation changed since the listeriosis outbreak in south africa? A review of foodborne disease outbreaks reported to the national institute for communicable diseases. 2020.
  2. [19]Makhunga S, Mashamba-Thompson TP, Hlongwa M, et al. Evidence on food control system in charitable food assistance system: a systematic scoping review. SSRN Journal 2018. 10.2139/ssrn.3228259 PMC6813981 31653271 · DOI
  3. [25]Ravinder EB, Saraswathi A. Literature review of cronbach alpha coefficient (α) and mcdonald’s omega coefficient (ω). European Journal of Molecular & Clinical Medicine 2020; 7: 2943– 9.
  4. [28]Nee SO, Sani NA. Assessment of knowledge, attitudes and practices (KAP) among food handlers at residential colleges and canteen regarding food safety. Sains Malaysiana 2011; 40: 403– 10.
  5. [36]Adzoyi PN, Honyenuga BQ. Exploring knowledge, attitudes and practices towards food hygiene by hospitality students in Ghana. Journal of Food Sci and Quality Mgmt 2014; 26: 2225– 0557.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Makhunga, S. E., Macherera, M., & Hlongwana, K.
Affiliations
  • University of KwaZulu-Natal (ZA)
  • Lupane State University (ZW)
Corresponding author
Makhunga, Sizwe Earl
Venue
BMJ Open
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2023-04
Volume
13
Issue
4
Pages
e065357
ISSN
2044-6055 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4366983388
Cited by
15
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 1
FWCI
2.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMJ Open (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • International Research and Exchanges Board
  • Inyuvesi Yakwazulu-Natali
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food Safety and Hygiene
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Salmonella and Campylobacter epidemiology
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations
Keywords
food handlers, safe food handling, charitable food assistance, food safety knowledge, food safety attitudes, food safety practices, food hygiene, cross-contamination prevention, temperature control, food labeling, nutrition information, food handler training, eThekwini District
MeSH terms
Cross-Sectional Studies, Food Handling, Humans, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, South Africa, Self Report, Food Safety, Food Assistance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review