Cited by 3CAR-T cell therapy researchCancer survivorship and careBiomedical Ethics and Regulation

Experiences and perspectives on chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy among recipients, carers and referrers (RE-TELL): a qualitative study to inform CAR T-cell service design

Open access
Fyfe, Robert, Anstis, Olivia, Kapadia, Kushant, Jordan, Mallory, Sword, Danielle Oriwa, Weinkove, Robert·2024·BMJ Open

Abstract

Objectives: RE-TELL is a qualitative study, which aims to understand patient, support person, clinician and coordinator experiences and perspectives of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy, to inform design of a clinical CAR T-cell service in Aotearoa New Zealand. Design: Semistructured qualitative interviews focused on domains of: experience through treatment, elements that work well and those that could be improved on. Interviews used thematic analysis to identify key themes. A workshop was held to obtain participants’ reflections on interim analysis and proposed improvements. Participants: New Zealanders with experience of CAR T-cell therapy, including recipients, support persons, clinicians and coordinators. Results: We interviewed 19 participants comprising 5 CAR T-cell recipients, 3 support persons, 6 clinicians and 5 coordinators. Four participants identified as Māori. Thematic analysis identified three global themes. The first, ‘sociocultural factors impact CAR T access’, identified potential sources of inequity including geographic, financial and informed consent barriers. The second, ‘varying emotions, roles and enablers’, identified an easier treatment experience compared with alternatives; an underwhelming cell administration process; frustration with inpatient monitoring; burden on support persons and importance of ‘bridge’ organisations such as charities and patient support groups. Lastly, ‘golden opportunities: reimagining CAR T service delivery’, suggested: improved geographical access to CAR T-cell therapy, while retaining consolidated clinician experience; a ‘dashboard’ with information on CAR T-cell treatment, time frames and manufacture; a health navigator to co-ordinate non-medical aspects of treatment and signpost care; embedding of indigenous data sovereignty and ownership of cells; a cell infusion ceremony, incorporating family involvement and Māori cultural elements and outpatient administration and monitoring where possible. Conclusion: This study documented the current experience of New Zealanders receiving CAR T-cell therapy and identified opportunities for future service development. These insights are relevant to service design within Aotearoa New Zealand, and other countries developing equitable CAR T-cell services.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-071112

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 18

  1. [2]Schuster SJ, Bishop MR, Tam CS, et al. Tisagenlecleucel in adult Relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. N Engl J Med 2019; 380: 45– 56. 10.1056/NEJMoa1804980 30501490 · DOI · Paper page
  2. [3]Jommi C, Bramanti S, Pani M, et al. CAR T-cell therapies in Italy: patient access barriers and recommendations for health system solutions. Front Pharmacol 2022; 13: 915342. 10.3389/fphar.2022.915342 35837293 PMC9275825 · DOI
  3. [4]Lim F, Yunxin C, Huang F-J, et al. A unique Hub-and-spoke model to optimize patient management in lymphoma using novel CAR T-cell therapy in Southeast and South Asia. Hematol Oncol 2022. 10.1002/hon.3057 36047631 · DOI
  4. [5]Hudson M, Mead ATP, Chagné D, et al. Indigenous perspectives and gene editing in Aotearoa New Zealand. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 2019; 7: 70. 10.3389/fbioe.2019.00070 31032252 PMC6470265 · DOI
  5. [6]Kamal-Bahl S, Puckett JT, Bagchi I, et al. Barriers and solutions to improve access for Chimeric antigen receptor therapies. Immunotherapy May 27, 2022. 10.2217/imt-2022-0037 35621253 · DOI
  6. [7]Emole J, Lawal O, Lupak O, et al. Demographic differences among patients treated with Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy in the United States. Cancer Med 2022; 11: 4440– 8. 10.1002/cam4.4797 35527361 PMC9741965 · DOI
  7. [8]Gagelmann N, Sureda A, Montoto S, et al. Access to and Affordability of CAR T-cell therapy in multiple myeloma: an EBMT position paper. Lancet Haematol 2022; 9: e786– 95. 10.1016/S2352-3026(22)00226-5 36174641 · DOI
  8. [9]George P, Dasyam N, Giunti G, et al. Third-generation anti-Cd19 Chimeric antigen receptor T-cells incorporating a Tlr2 domain for Relapsed or refractory B-cell lymphoma: a phase I clinical trial protocol (ENABLE). BMJ Open 2020; 10: e034629. 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034629 PMC7044946 32041862 · DOI
  9. [10]Gurney J, Stanley J, McLeod M, et al. Disparities in cancer-specific survival between Māori and non-Māori new Zealanders, 2007-2016. JCO Glob Oncol 2020; 6: 766– 74. 10.1200/GO.20.00028 32511067 PMC7328125 · DOI
  10. [12]Zozaya N, Villaseca J, Abdalla F, et al. A strategic reflection for the management and implementation of CAR-T therapy in Spain: an expert consensus paper. Clin Transl Oncol 2022; 24: 968– 80. 10.1007/s12094-021-02757-9 34997475 PMC8741571 · DOI
  11. [13]Castillo G, Lalu MM, Asad S, et al. Navigating choice in the face of uncertainty: using a theory informed qualitative approach to identifying potential patient barriers and Enablers to participating in an early phase Chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy trial. BMJ Open 2021; 11: e043929. 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043929 PMC7986876 33741670 · DOI
  12. [14]Chow RD, Bradley EH, Gross CP. Comparison of cancer-related spending and mortality rates in the US vs. 21 high-income countries. JAMA Health Forum 2022; 3: e221229. 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2022.1229 35977250 PMC9142870 · DOI
  13. [15]Weinkove R, George P, Ruka M, et al. Chimeric antigen receptor T-cells in New Zealand: challenges and opportunities. N Z Med J 2021; 134: 96– 108. 34531588
  14. [16]Boyd H, McKernon S, Mullin B, et al. Improving Healthcare through the use of Co-design. N Z Med J 2012; 125: 76– 87. 22854362
  15. [18]Fugard A, Potts H. Thematic analysis. SAGE Research Methods Foundation, 2019. Available: https://dx.doi.org/9781529748659
  16. [19]Durie M. Whaiora: Maori Health Development. Auckland: Oxford University Press, 1998: 68– 74.
  17. [20]Buradagunta CS, Garacci Z, D’Souza A, et al. Socioeconomic disadvantage contributes to ethnic disparities in multiple myeloma survival: a matched cohort study. Blood Cancer J 2022; 12: 82. 10.1038/s41408-022-00681-x 35614050 PMC9132975 · DOI
  18. [21]Shah N, Delforge M, San-Miguel J, et al. Patient experience before and after treatment with Idecabtagene Vicleucel (ide-Cel, Bb2121): qualitative analysis of patient interviews in the Karmma trial. Leuk Res 2022; 120: 106921. 10.1016/j.leukres.2022.106921 35930999 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fyfe, R., Anstis, O., Kapadia, K., Jordan, M., Sword, D. O., & Weinkove, R.
Affiliations
  • Malaghan Institute of Medical Research (NZ)
  • Deloitte (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Fyfe, Robert
Venue
BMJ Open
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2024-01
Volume
14
Issue
1
Pages
e071112
ISSN
2044-6055 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4391147779
Cited by
3
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2
FWCI
0.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMJ Open (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • The Thompson Family Foundation (N/A)
  • Janssen-Cilag Pty Ltd (N/A)
  • The Malaghan Institute (N/A)
  • Health Research Council (19/139)
  • LifeBlood Trust (N/A)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › CAR-T cell therapy research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Biomedical Ethics and Regulation
Keywords
CAR T-cell therapy, patient experience, support persons, health service design, access to treatment, health disparities, Māori, socio-cultural barriers, informed consent, health navigators, Indigenous data sovereignty, patient support groups, inpatient monitoring, outpatient administration, New Zealand
MeSH terms
Receptors, Chimeric Antigen, Australasian People, Humans, T-Lymphocytes, Immunotherapy, Adoptive, Caregivers, Cell- and Tissue-Based Therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review