Experiences and perspectives on chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy among recipients, carers and referrers (RE-TELL): a qualitative study to inform CAR T-cell service design
Open accessAbstract
Objectives: RE-TELL is a qualitative study, which aims to understand patient, support person, clinician and coordinator experiences and perspectives of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy, to inform design of a clinical CAR T-cell service in Aotearoa New Zealand. Design: Semistructured qualitative interviews focused on domains of: experience through treatment, elements that work well and those that could be improved on. Interviews used thematic analysis to identify key themes. A workshop was held to obtain participants’ reflections on interim analysis and proposed improvements. Participants: New Zealanders with experience of CAR T-cell therapy, including recipients, support persons, clinicians and coordinators. Results: We interviewed 19 participants comprising 5 CAR T-cell recipients, 3 support persons, 6 clinicians and 5 coordinators. Four participants identified as Māori. Thematic analysis identified three global themes. The first, ‘sociocultural factors impact CAR T access’, identified potential sources of inequity including geographic, financial and informed consent barriers. The second, ‘varying emotions, roles and enablers’, identified an easier treatment experience compared with alternatives; an underwhelming cell administration process; frustration with inpatient monitoring; burden on support persons and importance of ‘bridge’ organisations such as charities and patient support groups. Lastly, ‘golden opportunities: reimagining CAR T service delivery’, suggested: improved geographical access to CAR T-cell therapy, while retaining consolidated clinician experience; a ‘dashboard’ with information on CAR T-cell treatment, time frames and manufacture; a health navigator to co-ordinate non-medical aspects of treatment and signpost care; embedding of indigenous data sovereignty and ownership of cells; a cell infusion ceremony, incorporating family involvement and Māori cultural elements and outpatient administration and monitoring where possible. Conclusion: This study documented the current experience of New Zealanders receiving CAR T-cell therapy and identified opportunities for future service development. These insights are relevant to service design within Aotearoa New Zealand, and other countries developing equitable CAR T-cell services.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The complexity and high cost of CAR-T-cell therapy place a substantial burden on family caregivers.
“The complexity and high cost of this treatment not only complicate clinical management but also place a substantial burden on family caregivers.”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Using thematic analysis in psychology
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006) · Qualitative Research in Psychology · doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa · Cited by 194,414 · see citing works
Axicabtagene Ciloleucel as Second-Line Therapy for Large B-Cell Lymphoma
Locke, F. L., Miklos, D. B., Jacobson, C. A., Perales, M.-A., Kersten, M.-J., Oluwole, O. O., Ghobadi, A., Rapoport, A. P., McGuirk, J., Pagel, J. M., et al. (2022) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa2116133 · Cited by 1,607 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 18
- [2]Schuster SJ, Bishop MR, Tam CS, et al. Tisagenlecleucel in adult Relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. N Engl J Med 2019; 380: 45– 56. 10.1056/NEJMoa1804980 30501490 · DOI · Paper page
- [3]Jommi C, Bramanti S, Pani M, et al. CAR T-cell therapies in Italy: patient access barriers and recommendations for health system solutions. Front Pharmacol 2022; 13: 915342. 10.3389/fphar.2022.915342 35837293 PMC9275825 · DOI
- [4]Lim F, Yunxin C, Huang F-J, et al. A unique Hub-and-spoke model to optimize patient management in lymphoma using novel CAR T-cell therapy in Southeast and South Asia. Hematol Oncol 2022. 10.1002/hon.3057 36047631 · DOI
- [5]Hudson M, Mead ATP, Chagné D, et al. Indigenous perspectives and gene editing in Aotearoa New Zealand. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 2019; 7: 70. 10.3389/fbioe.2019.00070 31032252 PMC6470265 · DOI
- [6]Kamal-Bahl S, Puckett JT, Bagchi I, et al. Barriers and solutions to improve access for Chimeric antigen receptor therapies. Immunotherapy May 27, 2022. 10.2217/imt-2022-0037 35621253 · DOI
- [7]Emole J, Lawal O, Lupak O, et al. Demographic differences among patients treated with Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy in the United States. Cancer Med 2022; 11: 4440– 8. 10.1002/cam4.4797 35527361 PMC9741965 · DOI
- [8]Gagelmann N, Sureda A, Montoto S, et al. Access to and Affordability of CAR T-cell therapy in multiple myeloma: an EBMT position paper. Lancet Haematol 2022; 9: e786– 95. 10.1016/S2352-3026(22)00226-5 36174641 · DOI
- [9]George P, Dasyam N, Giunti G, et al. Third-generation anti-Cd19 Chimeric antigen receptor T-cells incorporating a Tlr2 domain for Relapsed or refractory B-cell lymphoma: a phase I clinical trial protocol (ENABLE). BMJ Open 2020; 10: e034629. 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034629 PMC7044946 32041862 · DOI
- [10]Gurney J, Stanley J, McLeod M, et al. Disparities in cancer-specific survival between Māori and non-Māori new Zealanders, 2007-2016. JCO Glob Oncol 2020; 6: 766– 74. 10.1200/GO.20.00028 32511067 PMC7328125 · DOI
- [12]Zozaya N, Villaseca J, Abdalla F, et al. A strategic reflection for the management and implementation of CAR-T therapy in Spain: an expert consensus paper. Clin Transl Oncol 2022; 24: 968– 80. 10.1007/s12094-021-02757-9 34997475 PMC8741571 · DOI
- [13]Castillo G, Lalu MM, Asad S, et al. Navigating choice in the face of uncertainty: using a theory informed qualitative approach to identifying potential patient barriers and Enablers to participating in an early phase Chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy trial. BMJ Open 2021; 11: e043929. 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043929 PMC7986876 33741670 · DOI
- [14]Chow RD, Bradley EH, Gross CP. Comparison of cancer-related spending and mortality rates in the US vs. 21 high-income countries. JAMA Health Forum 2022; 3: e221229. 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2022.1229 35977250 PMC9142870 · DOI
- [15]Weinkove R, George P, Ruka M, et al. Chimeric antigen receptor T-cells in New Zealand: challenges and opportunities. N Z Med J 2021; 134: 96– 108. 34531588
- [16]Boyd H, McKernon S, Mullin B, et al. Improving Healthcare through the use of Co-design. N Z Med J 2012; 125: 76– 87. 22854362
- [18]Fugard A, Potts H. Thematic analysis. SAGE Research Methods Foundation, 2019. Available: https://dx.doi.org/9781529748659
- [19]Durie M. Whaiora: Maori Health Development. Auckland: Oxford University Press, 1998: 68– 74.
- [20]Buradagunta CS, Garacci Z, D’Souza A, et al. Socioeconomic disadvantage contributes to ethnic disparities in multiple myeloma survival: a matched cohort study. Blood Cancer J 2022; 12: 82. 10.1038/s41408-022-00681-x 35614050 PMC9132975 · DOI
- [21]Shah N, Delforge M, San-Miguel J, et al. Patient experience before and after treatment with Idecabtagene Vicleucel (ide-Cel, Bb2121): qualitative analysis of patient interviews in the Karmma trial. Leuk Res 2022; 120: 106921. 10.1016/j.leukres.2022.106921 35930999 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Lin, X., Liu, J., Chen, J., Tang, J., Huang, Z., Wang, Y., & Shi, S. (2026) · Asia-Pacific Journal of Oncology Nursing · doi:10.1016/j.apjon.2025.100850 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“16,18 23 – 25 Quantitative studies have shown that 15% of family caregivers of patients receiving CAR-T-cell therapy experience moderate to severe burdens, and 47.7% exhibit symptoms of depression.”
Influential
- Authors
- Fyfe, R., Anstis, O., Kapadia, K., Jordan, M., Sword, D. O., & Weinkove, R.
- Affiliations
- Malaghan Institute of Medical Research (NZ)
- Deloitte (United States) (US)
- Corresponding author
- Fyfe, Robert
- Venue
- BMJ Open
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2024-01
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- e071112
- ISSN
- 2044-6055 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC10824048
- OpenAlex
- W4391147779
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2
- FWCI
- 0.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- BMJ Open (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- The Thompson Family Foundation (N/A)
- Janssen-Cilag Pty Ltd (N/A)
- The Malaghan Institute (N/A)
- Health Research Council (19/139)
- LifeBlood Trust (N/A)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › CAR-T cell therapy research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Biomedical Ethics and Regulation
- Keywords
- CAR T-cell therapy, patient experience, support persons, health service design, access to treatment, health disparities, Māori, socio-cultural barriers, informed consent, health navigators, Indigenous data sovereignty, patient support groups, inpatient monitoring, outpatient administration, New Zealand
- MeSH terms
- Receptors, Chimeric Antigen, Australasian People, Humans, T-Lymphocytes, Immunotherapy, Adoptive, Caregivers, Cell- and Tissue-Based Therapy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review