Cited by 0Food Security and Health in Diverse PopulationsHealthcare Policy and ManagementHomelessness and Social Issues

Pragmatic trial evaluating a randomly allocated Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program outreach and enrolment assistance programme in Michigan: study protocol

Open access
Samuel, Laura, Stuart, Elizabeth A, Liu, Yifan, Szanton, Sarah L, Clark, Alexis L, Miguel, Marta, Schneider, Matthew, Mashrah, Alymamah +2 more·2025·BMJ Open

Abstract

Introduction: Low-income adults with disabilities experience disproportionately high rates of food insecurity and preventable healthcare utilisation. The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) can reduce food insecurity and improve health, but there are accessibility gaps in the SNAP enrolment process. Existing outreach and enrolment assistance programmes have been shown to boost SNAP enrolment, but their health effects are understudied. This study estimates the effects of a SNAP outreach and enrolment assistance programme on health outcomes among low-income adults with disabilities. Methods and analysis: The study pragmatically evaluates a programme that provided outreach and SNAP enrolment assistance for low-income households. The study leverages a random process that selected households for one of two types of outreach, including an information-only arm and an information plus enrolment assistance arm, which formed a control group by default. The study will estimate the effect of this programme among low-income adults with disabilities using Medicaid and SNAP administrative data. Study outcomes include emergency department, hospital and long-term nursing home utilisation. SNAP enrolment and benefit amounts are secondary study outcomes and will be tested as a mediating mechanism of action. The study will test effect heterogeneity based on race, ethnicity, age and chronic conditions. Ethics and dissemination: The study, which relies on deidentified data, was determined to be exempt as human subjects research by the Institutional Review Boards at Johns Hopkins Medicine and the Michigan Department of Health and Human Services. The study is being conducted in ongoing consultation with an Advisory Group of experts in food advocacy and disability advocacy. In addition to disseminating findings in peer-reviewed publications, findings will be disseminated to state decision-makers and the community in partnership with an advisory group.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-101369

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 46

Authors
Samuel, L., Stuart, E. A., Liu, Y., Szanton, S. L., Clark, A. L., Miguel, M., Schneider, M., Mashrah, A., Laretz, M., & Swenor, B.
Affiliations
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • Benefits Data Trust (US)
  • Michigan Department of Health and Human Services (US)
Corresponding author
Samuel, Laura
Venue
BMJ Open
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2025-09
Volume
15
Issue
9
Pages
e101369
ISSN
2044-6055 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4414040496
Cited by
0
References
46
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMJ Open (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
National Institute of Nursing Research (R01NR020885)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Healthcare Policy and Management
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Homelessness and Social Issues
Keywords
Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, food insecurity, health care utilization, emergency department visits, hospitalization, nursing home admission, Medicaid, program evaluation, heterogeneous effects, racial and ethnic disparities, Michigan
MeSH terms
Food Insecurity, Adult, Female, Food Supply, Persons with Disabilities, Humans, Male, Michigan, Poverty, United States, Program Evaluation, Food Assistance, Pragmatic Clinical Trials as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review