Cited by 0Health Policy Implementation SciencePrimary Care and Health OutcomesEvaluation and Performance Assessment

Implementation of a learning health system for the management of non-communicable diseases in Thailand: a realist evaluation protocol

Open access
Marszalek, Milena, Wiwatkunupakarn, Nutchar, Buawangpong, Nida, Rinpon, Kawinthip, Herber, Natasha, Carvalho, Chris, Mihaylova, Borislava, Nitsch, Dorothea +5 more·2026·BMJ Open

Abstract

Introduction: Learning health systems (LHS) are an approach to translate patient data into actionable clinical insights, empower healthcare teams to drive quality improvement and reduce health inequalities. Here we present a protocol for a realist evaluation to explore what works to implement a learning health system approach in primary care settings in Thailand, for whom does it work, how, why and in what circumstances. Methods and analysis: A mixed-methods realist evaluation will run in parallel with an interventional trial [Reg No: NCT06873243 ] in Northern Thailand which aims to improve the management of hypertension (HTN), type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and chronic kidney diseases (CKDs) using a data-supported learning health systems approach. As part of the trial, 16 primary care units (PCUs) in Chiang Mai and Lamphun provinces will be randomly selected to receive a learning health system intervention to support quality improvement for care of HTN, T2DM and CKD. Performance will be compared between intervention PCUs and all other PCUs in the region. Participants of the realist evaluation will include clinical and other professional staff involved in the development and implementation of the LHS. This realist evaluation will use both quantitative and qualitative data, including semi-structured interviews, surveys and documents from participating sites. Quantitative and qualitative findings will be systematically integrated to test, refine and validate context-mechanism-outcomes to identify consistencies, contradictions and explanatory mechanisms as part of a final programme theory for the successful implementation of the LHS. Ethics and dissemination: Ethical approval has been granted by all collaborating university Research Ethics Committees (ref: 1090, 0321, 32540). Results will be disseminated to stakeholders, including patients and the public, health providers, the Thai government and WHO office. Our methods and dissemination will be guided by National Institute for Health Research and Guidelines International Network reporting standards for Patient and Public Involvement and Engagement.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-109261

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 26

Authors
Marszalek, M., Wiwatkunupakarn, N., Buawangpong, N., Rinpon, K., Herber, N., Carvalho, C., Mihaylova, B., Nitsch, D., Mathur, R., Chantler, T., Angkurawaranon, C., Jiraporncharoen, W., & Ford, J. A.
Affiliations
  • Queen Mary University of London (GB)
  • London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (GB)
  • Chiang Mai University (TH)
Corresponding author
Jiraporncharoen, Wichuda
Venue
BMJ Open
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2026-07
Volume
16
Issue
7
Pages
e109261
ISSN
2044-6055 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W7168528990
Cited by
0
References
26
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMJ Open (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • LSHTM Research Online (London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute for Health Research Health Protection Research Unit (NIHR200929)
  • Barts Charity (MGU0504)
  • NIHR Global Health Research Group (NIHR156161)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Primary Care and Health Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Evaluation and Performance Assessment
Keywords
learning health systems, non-communicable diseases, hypertension, type 2 diabetes, chronic kidney disease, primary care, quality improvement, implementation, context-mechanism-outcome, northern Thailand, patient and public involvement
MeSH terms
Noncommunicable Diseases, Learning Health System, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Humans, Hypertension, Primary Health Care, Research Design, Thailand, Renal Insufficiency, Chronic, Quality Improvement

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review