Cited by 198Child Abuse and TraumaIntimate Partner and Family ViolenceMilitary, Security, and Education Studies

Who perpetrates violence against children? A systematic analysis of age-specific and sex-specific data

Open access
Devries, Karen, Knight, Louise, Petzold, Max, Merrill, Katherine G, Maxwell, Lauren, Williams, Abigail, Cappa, Claudia, Chan, Ko Ling +11 more·2018·BMJ Paediatrics Open

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The epidemiology of violence against children is likely to differ substantially by sex and age of the victim and the perpetrator. Thus far, investment in effective prevention strategies has been hindered by lack of clarity in the burden of childhood violence across these dimensions. We produced the first age-specific and sex-specific prevalence estimates by perpetrator type for physical, sexual and emotional violence against children globally. DESIGN: We used random effects meta-regression to estimate prevalence. Estimates were adjusted for relevant quality covariates, variation in definitions of violence and weighted by region-specific, age-specific and sex-specific population data to ensure estimates reflect country population structures. DATA SOURCES: Secondary data from 600 population or school-based representative datasets and 43 publications obtained via systematic literature review, representing 13 830 estimates from 171 countries. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES: Estimates for recent violence against children aged 0-19 were included. RESULTS: The most common perpetrators of physical and emotional violence for both boys and girls across a range of ages are household members, with prevalence often surpassing 50%, followed by student peers. Children reported experiencing more emotional than physical violence from both household members and students. The most common perpetrators of sexual violence against girls aged 15-19 years are intimate partners; however, few data on other perpetrators of sexual violence against children are systematically collected internationally. Few age-specific and sex-specific data are available on violence perpetration by schoolteachers; however, existing data indicate high prevalence of physical violence from teachers towards students. Data from other authority figures, strangers, siblings and other adults are limited, as are data on neglect of children. CONCLUSIONS: Without further investment in data generation on violence exposure from multiple perpetrators for boys and girls of all ages, progress towards Sustainable Development Goals 4, 5 and 16 may be slow. Despite data gaps, evidence shows violence from household members, peers in school and for girls, from intimate partners, should be prioritised for prevention. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: PROSPERO 2015: CRD42015024315.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmjpo-2017-000180

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Devries, K., Knight, L., Petzold, M., Merrill, K. G., Maxwell, L., Williams, A., Cappa, C., Chan, K. L., Garcia-Moreno, C., Hollis, N., Kress, H., Peterman, A., Walsh, S. D., Kishor, S., Guedes, A., Bott, S., Butron Riveros, B. C., Watts, C., & Abrahams, N.
Affiliations
  • London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (GB)
  • University of Gothenburg (SE)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • McGill University (CA)
  • Brunel University of London (GB)
  • United Nations Children's Fund (US)
  • Hong Kong Polytechnic University (HK)
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US)
  • ICF International (United States) (US)
  • World Health Organization Regional Office for the Americas (US)
  • South African Medical Research Council (ZA)
Corresponding author
Knight, Louise
Venue
BMJ Paediatrics Open
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2018-02
Volume
2
Issue
1
Pages
e000180
ISSN
2399-9772 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2787489480
Cited by
198
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 26 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 1
FWCI
22.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • BMJ Paediatrics Open (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • LSHTM Research Online (London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine) (acceptedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • PolyU Institutional Research Archive (Hong Kong Polytechnic University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Funders
  • Pan-American Health Organization
  • kNOw Violence in Childhood initiative.
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Military, Security, and Education Studies
Keywords
violence against children, perpetrator type, physical violence, sexual violence, emotional abuse, age-specific prevalence, household members, intimate partners, teachers, child neglect, violence prevention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review