Impact of introducing an electronic physiological surveillance system on hospital mortality
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Other EWSs have influenced in-hospital mortality, sepsis or LOS, but not across the breadth of outcomes observed in this study.
“Other EWSs have influenced in-hospital mortality, sepsis or LOS, but not across the breadth of outcomes we observed4,5,26,27.”
From Real-time surveillance system for patient deterioration: a pragmatic cluster-randomized controlled trial (2025) · cites this paper as [5]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Medication-related clinical decision support alert overrides in inpatients
Nanji, K. C., Seger, D. L., Slight, S. P., Amato, M. G., Beeler, P. E., Her, Q. L., Dalleur, O., Eguale, T., Wong, A., Silvers, E. R., et al. (2018) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1093/jamia/ocx115 · Cited by 179 · see citing works
Rossetti, S. C., Dykes, P. C., Knaplund, C., Cho, S., Withall, J., Lowenthal, G., Albers, D., Lee, R. Y., Jia, H., Bakken, S., et al. (2025) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-025-03609-7 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
- Authors
- Schmidt, P. E., Meredith, P., Prytherch, D. R., Watson, D., Watson, V., Killen, R. M., Greengross, P., Mohammed, M. A., & Smith, G. B.
- Affiliations
- Queen Alexandra Hospital (GB)
- Portsmouth Hospitals NHS Trust (GB)
- University Hospital Coventry (GB)
- Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust (GB)
- University of Bradford (GB)
- Bournemouth University (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Schmidt, Paul E
- Venue
- BMJ Quality & Safety
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2015-01-20
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 176-177
- ISSN
- 1475-3898 (ISSN-L)
- 2044-5415
- 2044-5423
- OpenAlex
- W4244047995
- Cited by
- 26
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Update notices
- correction (2015-10-22)
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- BMJ Quality & Safety (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Healthcare Technology and Patient Monitoring
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Hospital Admissions and Outcomes
- Keywords
- in-hospital mortality, patient monitoring, quality improvement
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
