‘This is our liver patient…’: use of narratives during resident and nurse handoff conversations
Abstract
Objective Handoffs are often framed as the co-construction of a shared understanding relying on narrative storytelling. We investigated how narratives are constructed and used during resident and nurse handoff conversations. Method We audio-recorded resident (n=149) and nurse (n=126) handoffs in an inpatient medicine unit. Qualitative analysis using grounded theory was conducted to identify and characterise the structure of resident and nursing handoff narratives. Results Handoff conversations among both residents and nurses used three types of narratives: narratives on creating clinical imagery, narratives on coordinating care continuity and narratives on integrating contextual aspects of care. Clinical imagery narratives were common during patient introductions: residents used a top-down approach relying on overarching patient clinical situations (eg, 'a liver patient'), whereas nurses used a bottom-up approach using patient-specific identifying information. Narratives on the coordination of care continuity for residents focused on managing internal and external coordination activities, whereas nurse narratives focused on internal coordination, emphasising their role as an interface between patients and their physicians. Both resident and nurse narratives on the contextual aspects of care had considerable focus on highlighting 'heads up' anticipatory information and personal patient information; such information was often not present in patient charts, but was important for…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Prior work has found that nurses more frequently use a "bottom-up" (data and needs first) approach to patient summarization.
“Prior work has also found that nurses more frequently use a “bottom-up” (data and needs first) approach to patient summarization,76 which agrees with our finding of specific risk-increasing data and conditions being important for handoff support (Subtheme 3.c).”
From Potential uses of AI for perioperative nursing handoffs: a qualitative study (2023) · cites this paper as [76]
Cites
The Discovery of Grounded Theory; Strategies for Qualitative Research
Glaser, B. G., Strauss, A. L., & Strutzel, E. (1968) · Nursing Research · doi:10.1097/00006199-196807000-00014 · Cited by 39,449 · see citing works
The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (2017) · Aldine (Routledge reprint) · doi:10.4324/9780203793206 · Cited by 25,789 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Potential uses of AI for perioperative nursing handoffs: a qualitative study
King, C. R., Shambe, A., & Abraham, J. (2023) · JAMIA Open · doi:10.1093/jamiaopen/ooad015 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
“Prior work has also found that nurses more frequently use a “bottom-up” (data and needs first) approach to patient summarization, 76 which agrees with our finding of specific risk-increasing data and conditions being important for handoff support (Subtheme 3.c).”
BackgroundSelf-citation
- Authors
- Kannampallil, T., Jones, S., & Abraham, J.
- Affiliations
- Washington University in St. Louis (US)
- University of Illinois Chicago (US)
- Corresponding author
- Kannampallil, Thomas
- Venue
- BMJ Quality & Safety
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2019-07-03
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 135-141
- ISSN
- 1475-3898 (ISSN-L)
- 2044-5415
- 2044-5423
- OpenAlex
- W2954957032
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2023: 1 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 0.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- BMJ Quality & Safety (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Hospital Admissions and Outcomes
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Patient Safety and Medication Errors
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
- Keywords
- patient handover, narrative, continuity of care, patient safety, shared awareness
- MeSH terms
- Continuity of Patient Care, Female, Humans, Inpatients, Internal Medicine, Internship and Residency, Male, Nurses, Patient Care Team, Quality of Health Care, Video Recording, Physician-Nurse Relations, Interdisciplinary Communication, Narration, Qualitative Research, Patient Handoff, Grounded Theory
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review