Cited by 42Patient Safety and Medication ErrorsElectronic Health Records SystemsSafe Handling of Antineoplastic Drugs

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Improving the safety and efficiency of nurse medication rounds through the introduction of an automated dispensing cabinet

Open access
Cottney, Alan·2014·BMJ Quality Improvement Reports

Abstract

Information technology (IT) systems are being utilised with increasing frequency at the prescribing and dispensing stage of the medicines-use process in UK hospitals. However, much less development has taken place with regard to the implementation of IT systems at the administration stage of medicines-use. A technology that has been implemented widely at the administration stage in North American hospitals is the automated dispensing cabinet (ADC), which has been shown to reduce nurse medication administration errors and reduce the time that nurses spend administering medication. The current project was undertaken to assess whether these benefits would be realised with the introduction of an ADC on an inpatient ward in a UK mental health hospital. Nurses were observed administering medication before and after the implementation of an ADC on a ward at East London NHS Foundation Trust (ELFT). The findings from these observations showed that the use of the ADC led to a reduction in the medication administration error rate from 8.9% to 7.2%; however, this reduction was solely accounted for by a reduction in errors of negligible clinical severity. The types of administration errors noted after implementation of the ADC remained largely unchanged from beforehand. The ADC was found to reduce the amount of time that nurses spent administering medication from 2.94 min per dose to 2.37 min per dose. It is estimated that this reduction could generate around 66 min of additional free nursing time per ward per day. As a standalone device, the ADC was found to improve the efficiency of the medicines-use process, but had little meaningful effect on medication administration error rate at ELFT. However, it could be anticipated that additional benefit with regard to reducing medication administration errors may be demonstrated if the ADC was used in combination with other IT systems, such as electronic prescribing.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmjquality.u204237.w1843

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. [3]Soerensen AL, Lisby M, Nielsen LP The medication process in a psychiatric hospital: are errors a potential threat to patient safety? Risk Management and Healthcare Policy 2013; 6: 23– 31. 24049464 PMC3775703
  2. [4]Keers RN, Williams SD, Cooke J Prevalence and nature of medication administration errors in health care settings: a systematic review of direct observational evidence. Ann Pharmacother 2013; 47: 237– 56. 23386063
  3. [5]Berdot S, Gillaizeau F, Caruba T, et al et al Drug administration errors in hospital inpatients: a systematic review. PLOS ONE 2013; 8 (6): 1– 11. PMC3688612 23818992
  4. [6]Kohn LT, Corrigan JM, Donaldson MS, eds. To err is human: building a safer health system. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1999. 25077248
  5. [7]Agrawal A Medication errors: prevention using information technology systems. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2009; 67: 681– 6. 19594538 PMC2723209
  6. [8]Buntin MB, Burke MF, Hoaglin MC The benefits of health information technology: a review of the recent literature shows predominantly positive results. Health Affairs 2011; 30: 464– 71. 21383365
  7. [9]Pedersen CA, Schneider PJ, Scheckelhoff DJ ASHP national survey of pharmacy practice in hospital settings: dispensing and administration—2008. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2009; 66: 926– 46. 19420311
  8. [10]Skibinski KA, White BA, Lin LI-K Effects of technological interventions on the safety of a medication-use system. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2007; 64: 90– 6. 17189586
  9. [11]Borel JM, Rascati KL Effect of an automated, nursing unit-based drug-dispensing device on medication errors. Am J Health Syst Pharm 1995; 52: 1875– 9. 8528848
  10. [12]Barker KN, McConnell WE The problems of detecting medication errors in hospitals. Am J Hosp Pharm 1962; 19: 360– 9.
  11. [14]National Coordinating Council for Medication Error Reporting and Prevention. NCC MERP Taxonomy of Medication Errors. http://www.nccmerp.org/pdf/taxo2001-07-31.pdf (accessed 18 March 2013). 17523185
  12. [15]Haw C, Stubbs J, Dickens G An observational study of medication administration errors in old-age psychiatric inpatients. Int J Qual Health Care 2007; 19: 210– 16. 17562662

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Cottney, A.
Affiliations
East London NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
Corresponding author
Cottney, Alan
Venue
BMJ Quality Improvement Reports
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2014
Volume
3
Issue
1
Pages
u204237.w1843
ISSN
2050-1315 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2055977005
Cited by
42
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3
FWCI
1.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • BMJ Quality Improvement Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Patient Safety and Medication Errors
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Safe Handling of Antineoplastic Drugs
Keywords
automated dispensing cabinets, medication administration errors, psychiatric hospitals, hospital wards, electronic prescribing, nursing workload, hospital information technology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review