Design of the MIST study: a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled phase 2b trial of pirfenidone solution for inhalation in patients with progressive pulmonary fibrosis
Open accessAbstract
Introduction: Progressive pulmonary fibrosis (PPF) is a debilitating progression of pulmonary fibrosis in patients with interstitial lung diseases (ILDs) other than idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). Oral pirfenidone has been studied in non-IPF ILDs, but in smaller academic studies, it did not achieve a statistically significant change in the primary endpoint. Increased systemic exposure with oral administration may lead to substantial adverse events and limit its utility. Clinical data support inhaled pirfenidone for the treatment of PPF with improved tolerability compared with orally administered pirfenidone. Methods and analysis: Approximately 300 patients with PPF will be randomised 2:1:2 to one of three treatment arms: AP01 100 mg two times per day, AP01 50 mg two times per day or placebo two times per day by oral inhalation using the investigational eFlow Nebuliser System (PARI Pharma GmbH, Germany). The primary endpoint is the change from baseline in forced vital capacity at week 52. The main secondary endpoints are change in quality of life measurements from baseline to 52 weeks, time to disease progression and change in lung fibrosis scores based on high-resolution CT from baseline to 52 weeks. Trial registration number: NCT06329401 .
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 23 · Cited by 1
- Authors
- Kolb, M., Corte, T. J., Feldman, J., Nathan, S. D., Reisner, C., Nair, D., Woodhead, F., Lazarus, H., & Conoscenti, C.
- Affiliations
- McMaster University (CA)
- The University of Sydney (AU)
- Summit Health Eastside Clinic, Bend, Oregon, USA
- Inova Fairfax Hospital (US)
- DevPro Biopharma, Basking Ridge, New Jersey, USA
- Avalyn Pharma, Seattle, Washington, USA
- Corresponding author
- Kolb, Martin
- Venue
- BMJ Open Respiratory Research
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2025-12
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- e003059
- ISSN
- 2052-4439 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC12742111
- OpenAlex
- W7117249718
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 23
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1
- FWCI
- 0.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- BMJ Open Respiratory Research (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- Avalyn Pharma, Inc.
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Interstitial Lung Diseases and Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Inhalation and Respiratory Drug Delivery
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Systemic Sclerosis and Related Diseases
- Keywords
- pirfenidone, progressive pulmonary fibrosis, interstitial lung disease, forced vital capacity, high-resolution computed tomography, quality of life, disease progression, drug tolerability, antifibrotic therapy
- MeSH terms
- Administration, Inhalation, Aged, Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Nebulizers and Vaporizers, Pulmonary Fibrosis, Pyridones, Quality of Life, Vital Capacity, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Treatment Outcome, Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic, Disease Progression
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review