The relationship between depression and physical symptom burden in advanced cancer
Abstract
Background: Although an association between depression and physical burden has been demonstrated in advanced cancer, it remains unclear to what extent this is limited to specific physical symptoms, such as pain and fatigue, and is mediated by disease and treatment-related factors. We therefore investigated the relationship between depression and physical burden across a multitude of physical symptoms in this population, while controlling for cancer-related factors including disease severity and proximity to death. Patients and methods: A secondary analysis was performed on cross-sectional data in 487 patients with advanced cancer. Measures included the Beck Depression Inventory II and the Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale, which measured physical burden across 24 common cancer symptoms. Disease severity was assessed by survival time and by functional status using the Karnofsky Performance Status scale. Results: Depression severity significantly correlated with number of physical symptoms, symptom distress and symptom severity independent of cancer type, functional status, chemotherapy status and survival time (all p<0.001). Depression was associated with increased incidence, severity and distress across multiple physical symptoms and was an independent predictor of physical burden on multiple regression analysis. Conclusions: These findings support the view that a synergistic relationship exists between depression and a broad array of physical symptoms in patients with advanced cancer.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Symptoms in advanced cancer are related to worse functional status, worse treatment adherence, longer hospitalizations, and worse survival.
“y están relacionados con peor situación funcional, peor adherencia al tratamiento, hospitalizaciones más largas y peor supervivencia (17) .”
From AVANZACT: protocolo e intervención psicoterapéutica en cáncer avanzado basados en Terapia de Aceptación y Compromiso. (2025) · cites this paper as [17]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 37 · Cited by 101
- Authors
- Fitzgerald, P., Lo, C., Li, M., Gagliese, L., Zimmermann, C., & Rodin, G.
- Affiliations
- University Health Network (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Fitzgerald, Peter
- Venue
- BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2013-08-06
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 381-388
- ISSN
- 2045-435X (ISSN-L)
- 2045-4368
- OpenAlex
- W2137051713
- Cited by
- 101
- References
- 37
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 4
- FWCI
- 3.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- ResearchOnline at James Cook University (James Cook University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative and Oncologic Care
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
- Keywords
- depression, physical symptom burden, advanced cancer, cancer symptoms, symptom distress, symptom severity, disease severity, Karnofsky performance status, survival time, proximity to death
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Cross-Sectional Studies, Depression, Fatigue, Female, Humans, Male, Mental Status Schedule, Middle Aged, Neoplasms, Pain, Survival Analysis, Karnofsky Performance Status
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review