Cited by 1Smoking Behavior and CessationSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesCultural Competency in Health Care

126 Does culturally tailoring a smoking cessation intervention help more people to quit or reduce their smoking? A systematic review

Leinberger-Jabari, Andrea, Golob, Melaine, Begh, Rachna, Lindson, Nicola, Hartmann-Boyce, Jamie·2022·Abstracts

Abstract

Objectives Smoking cessation interventions developed in Western countries have not been as effective in helping people quit smoking when implemented outside of the Western context. This may be because smoking behaviours and predictors are rooted in culture. We define culture as the collective or shared values and beliefs that guide peoples’ decisions and behaviours. Adapting effective cessation interventions to address culturally influenced predictors of smoking behaviours could improve their impact across communities. However, the evidence of the overall effectiveness of culturally tailored interventions remains unclear, as well as the relative effectiveness of different tailoring methods. Interventions that are tailored more deeply, for example incorporating messaging drawn from cultural values may have more impact than those tailored more superficially (language translation). The aim of this systematic review is to examine the impact of culturally tailoring smoking cessation interventions to determine if they are more effective in helping people quit or reduce smoking. Method We searched Medline, Embase, PsychINFO, and CENTRAL for randomized controlled trials comparing a culturally tailored smoking cessation intervention to an intensity-matched non-tailored intervention or the same intervention without the tailored component. Studies that recruited adults and included quitting and/or reduced smoking as an outcome were included. Eligibility screening and data extraction wil…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/ebm-2022-ebmlive.16

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Youth who are members of LGBTQ or ethnic minority groups, as well as youth with experiences of immigration, foster care, homelessness, and the juvenile justice system, may use substances in the context of unique stressors and risk factors and thus may require tailored adaptations of existing evidence-based approaches.

    “Youth who are members of LGBTQ [93] or ethnic minority groups [94], as well as youth with experiences with immigration, foster care, homelessness, and the juvenile justice system may use substances in the context of unique stressors and risk factors and thus may require tailored adaptations of existing evidence-based approaches.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Leinberger-Jabari, A., Golob, M., Begh, R., Lindson, N., & Hartmann-Boyce, J.
Affiliations
University of Oxford (GB)
Venue
Abstracts
Published
2022-07
Pages
A9.1-A9
OpenAlex
W4285807173
Cited by
0
References
0
Type
conference abstract
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Abstracts (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Cultural Competency in Health Care
Keywords
smoking cessation interventions, smoking reduction, cultural tailoring, intervention adaptation, language translation, cross-cultural effectiveness, smoking cessation counseling, nicotine replacement therapy, nicotine gum, bupropion, varenicline, relapse prevention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review