Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 586

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Clinical expertise in the era of evidence-based medicine and patient choice

Open access
Haynes, R B.·2002·Evidence-Based Medicine

Abstract

Clinical expertise in the era of evidence-based medicine and patient choice Scenario You are caring for a 68 year old man who has hypertension (intermittently controlled) with a remote gastrointestinal bleed and non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) for 3 months, and an enlarged left atrium (so cardioversion is unlikely).The patient has no history of stroke or transient ischaemic attack.His father experienced a debilitating stroke several years ago and when he learns that his atrial fibrillation places him at higher risk for a stroke, he is visibly distressed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/ebm.7.2.36

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 586

Metadata

Authors
Haynes, R. B.
Venue
Evidence-Based Medicine
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2002-03-01
Volume
7
Issue
2
Pages
36-38
ISSN
1356-5524 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2162100119
Cited by
586
References
1
FWCI
8.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Clinical expertise in the era of evidence-based medicine and patient choice. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/ebm.7.2.36
The paper
Haynes, R. B. (2002). Clinical expertise in the era of evidence-based medicine and patient choice. Evidence-Based Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1136/ebm.7.2.36

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.