Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 15Psychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsEmergency and Acute Care StudiesChronic Disease Management Strategies

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A PILOT PROJECT TARGETING FREQUENT ATTENDERS AT THE EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT WITH MEDICALLY UNEXPLAINED SYMPTOMS

Baker, M, Stallard, J, Gibson, S·2013·Emergency Medicine Journal

Abstract

Objectives & Background: We identified that there is a cohort of people who attend our Emergency Department (ED) extremely frequently (>24 times per year) or who have frequent admissions (>12 per year). Analysing hospital clinical records identified that in many cases medically unexplained symptoms (MUS) drive the frequent presentation. The needs of these patients were not being met by a traditional dualistic approach in which people are seen in either physical or mental health settings. Indeed, despite frequent medical investigations/treatments, their symptoms persist, their problems are not resolved, they frequently complain and they keep coming back. This carries risk and distress for the patients, and heavy use of resources for the hospitals involved. Methods: Each month we looked at attendance data for the previous 3 months (this identified people who in an acute phase of repeat presentations). By accessing patients clinical records we determined the main factors which appeared to drive their frequent attendance and admissions and identified those who presented with MUS. Care plans were developed and each patient was contacted and offered weekly Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CBT) sessions to help them manage their symptoms. This was part of a case management approach in which coordinated, multidisciplinary reviews were undertaken resulting in an individualised care plan. Results: Thus far the pilot has seen a reduction in attendances at ED for 100% of patients included in study (N=20). Crucially, all now attend less than once per month. In total 245 attends were saved after the CBT interventions Conclusion: Providing a psychological intervention to this patient cohort is effective in reducing hospital costs by containing the most frequent attenders. CBT and care plans have reduced attendance to under once per month and subsequently reduced medical interventions and prescribing costs.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/emermed-2013-203113.2

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Baker, M., Stallard, J., & Gibson, S.
Affiliations
Royal Bournemouth Hospital (GB)
Venue
Emergency Medicine Journal
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2013-09-07
Volume
30
Issue
10
Pages
866.2-866
ISSN
  • 1351-0622 (ISSN-L)
  • 1472-0205
  • 1472-0213
OpenAlex
W2332999596
Cited by
15
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1
FWCI
0.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Emergency Medicine Journal (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Emergency and Acute Care Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Chronic Disease Management Strategies
Keywords
frequent attenders, emergency department visits, medically unexplained symptoms, cognitive behavioral therapy, case management, care planning, multidisciplinary care, hospital resource utilization, cost containment, psychological intervention, frequent hospital admissions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.