The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Guidance after twin and singleton neonatal death
Open accessAbstract
A study was made to determine whether parents whose newborn twin (n = 72) had died differed from bereaved singleton parents (n = 70) concerning their satisfaction with professional guidance and care. Most parents felt supported by hospital staff, but the twin parents had fewer avenues of available support, especially after their baby's death. The twin parents' situation requires special attention because they have specific needs that are not always addressed by the current range of available support services.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Parents of twins or multiples who lose 1 or more of the babies while other babies from the same delivery survive also have unique needs that may not be adequately addressed by a general perinatal bereavement care guideline.81,92”
From Bereavement care guidelines used in health care facilities immediately following perinatal loss: a scoping review (2024) · cites this paper as [81]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Bereaved parents in this situation have specific needs that are not always addressed by standard bereavement care, and specific support services, such as by the Center for Loss in Multiple Birth, may be needed.81,186”
From Bereavement care guidelines used in health care facilities immediately following perinatal loss: a scoping review (2024) · cites this paper as [81]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Follow-up of Families Who Experience a Perinatal Death
Rowe, J., Clyman, R. I., Green, C., Mikkelsen, C., Haight, J., & Ataide, L. (1978) · PEDIATRICS · doi:10.1542/peds.62.2.166 · Cited by 147
Management of perinatal loss of a twin.
Lewis, E., & Bryan, E. M. (1988) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.297.6659.1321 · Cited by 37
Management of perinatal loss of a twin.
Lewis, E., & Bryan, E. M. (1989) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.298.6667.184-a · Cited by 24
Perinatal bereavement after the loss of one twin.
Bryan, E. M. (1991) · PubMed · Cited by 8
Follow-up of families who experience a perinatal death
Rowe, J., Clyman, R. I., Green, C., Mikkelsen, C., Haight, J., & Ataide, L. (1979) · Journal of the American Academy of Child Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/s0002-7138(09)60496-9 · Cited by 7
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Guidelines for health care professionals supporting families experiencing a perinatal loss
Aerde, J. V., Gorodzinsky, F., & Canadian Paediatric Society (2001) · Paediatrics & Child Health · doi:10.1093/pch/6.7.469 · Cited by 73
Mothers’ perspectives on the perinatal loss of a co-twin: a qualitative study
Richards, J., Graham, R., Embleton, N. D., Campbell, C., & Rankin, J. (2015) · BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth · doi:10.1186/s12884-015-0579-z · Cited by 57
How Mothers Cope with the Death of a Twin or Higher Multiple
Swanson, P. B., Pearsall-Jones, J. G., & Hay, D. A. (2002) · Twin Research · doi:10.1375/twin.5.3.156 · Cited by 52
Parental experience following perinatal death: exploring the issues to make progress
Einaudi, M.-A., Coz, P. L., Malzac, P., Michel, F., D’Ercole, C., & Gire, C. (2010) · European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology · doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2010.04.003 · Cited by 49
Grief following the loss of a newborn twin compared to a singleton
Cuisinier, M. C. J., de Kleine, M. J. K., Kollée, L. A. A., Bethlehem, G., & de Graauw, C. P. H. M. (1996) · Acta Paediatrica · doi:10.1111/j.1651-2227.1996.tb14028.x · Cited by 31
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- de Kleine, M., Cuisinier, M., Kollée, L., Bethlehem, G., & de Graauw, K.
- Venue
- Archives of Disease in Childhood - Fetal and Neonatal Edition
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 1995-03
- Volume
- 72
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- F125-F126
- ISSN
- 1359-2998 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-2052
- PMC
- PMC2528382
- OpenAlex
- W2144181345
- Cited by
- 19
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 3.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Archives of Disease in Childhood Fetal & Neonatal (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
- Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Infant Development and Preterm Care
- Keywords
- neonatal death, twin pregnancy, parental bereavement, bereavement support, professional guidance, hospital staff support, parental satisfaction, support services, neonatal loss
- MeSH terms
- Bereavement, Counseling, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Parents, Social Support, Twins, Patient Satisfaction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
