The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Randomised controlled trial of colloid or crystalloid in hypotensive preterm infants
Open accessAbstract
AIM: To compare the efficacy of a colloid (5% albumin) and a crystalloid (isotonic saline) solution for treating hypotension in mechanically ventilated preterm infants. METHODS: Sixty three preterm infants weighing 540 to 1950 g at birth and with gestational ages of 23 to 34 weeks, who developed hypotension (mean arterial pressure < 25, 30, and 35 mm Hg for infants with birthweight <1, 1-1.49, and 1.5-1.99 kg, respectively) within the first 2 hours of life, were randomly allocated to receive intravenous infusions at 10 ml/kg of either 5% albumin (group 1, n=32) or isotonic (0.9%) saline (group 2, n=31). Inotropic support with dopamine infusion was given if the infants remained hypotensive after a total of three infusions (30 ml/kg). Subsequent extra doses of volume expander in the form of 5% albumin was given, depending on the infant’s blood pressure. RESULTS: There was no difference in the volume of the test solutions required between the two groups. Outcome, as assessed by the number of infants requiring inotropic support and death or chronic lung disease, did not differ between the groups. After inotropic support, however, group 1 required significantly more volume expander to maintain normal blood pressure (median: 27.5 ml/kg vs 10 ml/kg; P=0.0187) and had a higher mean (SEM) percentage weight gain within the first 48 hours of life (at 24 hours: 6.3(1.3)% vs 3.3(0.8)%; P=0.049; at 48 hours: 5.9(1.9)%vs 0.9(1.7)%; P=0.045). The difference in weight gain was significant at 48 hours even when only those infants not requiring inotropic support or extra 5% albumin were compared (group 1: 1.5(1.5)%, group 2: -4.2(1.1)%; P = 0.027). CONCLUSIONS: Isotonic saline is as effective as 5% albumin for treating hypotension in preterm infants, and it has the additional advantage of causing less fluid retention in the first 48 hours.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Wilkes, M. M., & Navickis, R. J. (2001) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-135-3-200108070-00007 · Cited by 486
Human albumin solution for resuscitation and volume expansion in critically ill patients
Roberts, I., Blackhall, K., Alderson, P., Bunn, F., & Schierhout, G. (2011) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd001208.pub4 · Cited by 355
Human albumin solution for resuscitation and volume expansion in critically ill patients
The Albumin Reviewers (Alderson P (2004) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd001208.pub2 · Cited by 105
Metadata
- Authors
- So, K. W., Fok, T. F., Ng, P. C., Wong, W. W., & Cheung, K. L.
- Venue
- Archives of Disease in Childhood - Fetal and Neonatal Edition
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 1997-01-01
- Volume
- 76
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- F43-F46
- ISSN
- 1359-2998 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-2052
- OpenAlex
- W2126639731
- Cited by
- 192
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Randomised controlled trial of colloid or crystalloid in hypotensive preterm infants. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/fn.76.1.f43
- The paper
- So, K. W., Fok, T. F., Ng, P. C., Wong, W. W., & Cheung, K. L. (1997). Randomised controlled trial of colloid or crystalloid in hypotensive preterm infants. Archives of Disease in Childhood - Fetal and Neonatal Edition. https://doi.org/10.1136/fn.76.1.f43
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.