Cited by 14Gut microbiota and healthGastrointestinal motility and disordersInflammatory Bowel Disease

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

An ultrastructural study of the effect of neomycin on the colon in the human subject and in the conventional and the germ-free mouse

Open access

Abstract

An electron microscopic study of the colon of normal mice and human subjects and those treated with neomycin is reported; there is a close resemblance between the mouse and human colons. After rapid disinfection of the colon, there is epithelial cell damage due to a toxic effect of the drug, a reduction in epithelial turnover accompanying the change in flora, and an important reduction in the cellularity of the lamina propria mainly due to a reduction in inflammatory cells. The changes in the lamina propria probably represent changes in the antipathogenetic defences of the host.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/gut.12.5.341

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Research works printed but not linked: 27

  1. Abrams, G. D., Bauer, H., and Sprinz, H. (1963). Influence of the normal flora on mucosal morphology and cellular renewal in the ileum. Lab. Invest., 12, 355-364.
  2. Aluwihare, A. P. R. (1969). The effect of neomycin on the colon. M.Chir. Thesis, Cambridge.
  3. Bauer, H., Horowitz, R. E., Levenson, S. M., and Popper, H. (1963). The response of the lymphatic tissue to the microbial flora. Amer. J. Path., 42, 471-483.
  4. Brotzu, G. (1962). Cytotoxic and cytostatic action of various antibiotics. Minerva chir., 17, 1254-1257.
  5. Corrin, B., Clarke, A. E., and Spencer, H. (1969). Ultrastructural localization of acid phosphatase in the rat lung. J. Anat. (Lond.), 104, 65-70.
  6. Davenport, H. A. (1960). Histological and Histochemical Technics. Saunders, Philadelphia and London.
  7. Deane, H. W. (1964). Some electron microscopic observations on the lamina propria of the gut, with comments on the close association of macrophages, plasma cells, and eosinophils. Anat. Rec., 149, 453-473. · DOI
  8. Dineen, P. (1961). The effect of neomycin bowel preparation on the susceptibility to systemic Staphylococcal infection. Surgery, 49, 727-730.
  9. Dobbins, W. O., Herrero, B. A., and Mansbach, C. M. (1968). Morphologic alterations associated with Neomycin induced malabsorption. Amer. J. med. Sci., 255, 63-77.
  10. Donellan, W. L. (1965). The structure of the colonic mucosa. Gastroenterology, 49, 496-514. · DOI
  11. Dubos, R. J., and Schaedler, R. W. (1960). The effect of the intestinal flora on the growth rate of mice and on their susceptibility to experimental infections. J. exp. Med., 111, 407-417. · DOI
  12. Friedmann, I., Dadswell, J. V., and Bird, E. S. (1966). Electronmicroscope studies of the neuroepithelium of the inner ear in guinea-pigs treated with neomycin. J. Path. Bact., 92, 415-422. · DOI
  13. Hally, A. D. (1964). A counting method for measuring the volume of tissue components in microscopical sections. Quart. J. micr. Sci., 105, 503-514.
  14. Heneghan, J. B. (1968). Ehrlich ascites tumour growth in gnotobiotic mice. In Advances in Germ-Free Research and Gnotobiology, edited by M. Miyakawa and T. D. Luckey. Iliffe Books, London.
  15. Kenworthy, R. (1968). Mild physiologic inflammation of conventional life. In Advances in Germ-Free Research and Gnotobiology, edited by M. Miyakawa and T. D. Luckey. Iliffe Books, London.
  16. Lancet (1970). Editorial The colon and the surgeon. Lancet, 1, 509-510.
  17. Le Blond, C. P., and Stevens, C. E. (1948). The constant renewal of the intestinal epithelium in the albino rat. Anat. Rec., 100, 357-377. · DOI
  18. Leon, S. A., and Brock, T. D. (1967). Effect of streptomycin and neomycin on physical properties of the ribosome. J. molec. Biol., 24, 391-404. · DOI
  19. Nakao, K., and Levenson, S. M. (1967). Atypical mitochondrial morphology of the intestinal absorptive cells of the germ-free rat. Experientia (Basel), 23, 494-496. · DOI
  20. Pascal, R. R., Kaye, G. I., and Lane, N. (1968). Colonic pericryptal fibroblast sheath I. Gastroenterology, 54, 835-851. · DOI
  21. Pittman, F. E., and Pittman, J. C. (1966). An electron microscopic study of the epithelium of normal human sigmoid colonic mucosa. Gut, 7, 644-661. · DOI
  22. Poth, E. J. (1952). Intestinal antisepsis. West. J. Surg., 60, 205-210.
  23. Rusnyak, I., Foldi, M., and Szabo, G. (1967). Lymphatics and Lymph
  24. Savage, D. C., and Dubos, R. (1968). Alterations in the mouse cecum and its flora produced by antibacterial drugs. J. exp. Med., 128, 97-110. · DOI
  25. Sprinz, H., Kundel, D. W., Dammin, G. J., Horowitz, R. E., Schneider, H., and Formal, S. B. (1961). The response of the germ-free guinea pig to oral bacterial challenge with E. coli and Shigella flexneri. Amer. J. Path., 39, 681-695. van der Waaij, D. (1968). Production of bacteria free mice by antibiotic decontamination. In Advances in Germ-Free Research and Gnotobiology, edited by M. Miyakawa and T. D. Luckey. Iliffe Books, London.
  26. Woodward, S. C., Herrmann, J. B., Shadomy, S., and Pulaski, E. J. (1964). Oral neomycin and the healing of colonic anastomoses in the rat. Surg. Gynec. Obstet., 119, 799-806.
  27. Zweifach, B. W., Grant, L., and McCluskey, R. T. (1965). The Inflammatory Process. Academic Press, New York.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Aluwihare, A. P. R.
Affiliations
Royal College of Surgeons of England (GB)
Corresponding author
Aluwihare, A. P. R.
Venue
Gut
Publisher
BMJ
Published
1971-05
Volume
12
Issue
5
Pages
341-349
ISSN
  • 0017-5749 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-3288
OpenAlex
W2052363747
Cited by
14
References
0
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2
FWCI
0.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Gut (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • The Mouseion at the JAXlibrary (Jackson Laboratory) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Inflammatory Bowel Disease
Keywords
neomycin, germ-free mice, human colon, epithelial damage, epithelial cell turnover, inflammatory cells, gut microbiota, drug toxicity, host defense against infection
MeSH terms
Animals, Basement Membrane, Cecum, Cell Nucleus, Collagen, Colon, Connective Tissue, Epithelial Cells, Epithelium, Fibroblasts, Germ-Free Life, Humans, Intestinal Mucosa, Microscopy, Electron, Neomycin, Nerve Tissue, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review