The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A meta-analysis on the influence of inflammatory bowel disease on pregnancy
Open accessAbstract
Background: Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) has a typical onset during the peak reproductive years. Evidence of the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes in IBD is important for the management of pregnancy to assist in its management. Aim: To provide a clear assessment of risk of adverse outcomes during pregnancy in women with IBD. Design: The Medline literature was searched to identify studies reporting outcomes of pregnancy in patients with IBD. Random-effect meta-analysis was used to compare outcomes between women with IBD and normal controls. Patients and setting: A total of 3907 patients with IBD (Crohn’s disease 1952 (63%), ulcerative colitis 1113 (36%)) and 320 531 controls were reported in 12 studies that satisfied the inclusion criteria. Results: For women with IBD, there was a 1.87-fold increase in incidence of prematurity (<37 weeks gestation; 95% CI 1.52 to 2.31; p<0.001) compared with controls. The incidence of low birth weight (<2500 g) was over twice that of normal controls (95% CI 1.38 to 3.19; p<0.001). Women with IBD were 1.5 times more likely to undergo caesarean section (95% CI 1.26 to 1.79; p<0.001), and the risk of congenital abnormalities was found to be 2.37-fold increased (95% CI 1.47 to 3.82; p<0.001). Conclusion: The study has shown a higher incidence of adverse pregnancy outcomes in patients with IBD. Further studies are required to clarify which women are at higher risk, as this was not determined in the present study. This has an effect on the management of patients with IBD during pregnancy, who should be treated as a potentially high-risk group.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology<SUBTITLE>A Proposal for Reporting</SUBTITLE>
Stroup, D. F. (2000) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.283.15.2008 · Cited by 20,623
Slattery, M. M., & Morrison, J. J. (2002) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(02)11476-0 · Cited by 675
Cited by
Dissemination and publication of research findings: an updated review of related biases
Song, F., Parekh, Hooper, L., Loke, Y., Ryder, J., Sutton, A., Hing, C., Kwok, C., Pang, C., & Harvey, I. (2010) · Health Technology Assessment · doi:10.3310/hta14080 · Cited by 1,039
Van Assche, G., Dignass, A., Reinisch, W., van der Woude, C. J., Sturm, A., De Vos, M., Guslandi, M., Oldenburg, B., Dotan, I., Marteau, P., et al. (2010) · Journal of Crohn's and Colitis · doi:10.1016/j.crohns.2009.09.009 · Cited by 894
The Toronto Consensus Statements for the Management of Inflammatory Bowel Disease in Pregnancy
Nguyen, G. C., Seow, C. H., Maxwell, C., Huang, V., Leung, Y., Jones, J., Leontiadis, G. I., Tse, F., Mahadevan, U., van der Woude, C. J., et al. (2016) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2015.12.003 · Cited by 473
Shah, S. C., Colombel, J. ‐., Sands, B. E., & Narula, N. (2016) · Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1111/apt.13475 · Cited by 357
European evidence based consensus on surgery for ulcerative colitis
Øresland, T., Bemelman, W. A., Sampietro, G. M., Spinelli, A., Windsor, A., Ferrante, M., Marteau, P., Zmora, O., Kotze, P. G., Espin-Basany, E., et al. (2015) · Journal of Crohn's and Colitis · doi:10.1016/j.crohns.2014.08.012 · Cited by 353
Metadata
- Authors
- Cornish, J., Tan, E., Teare, J., Teoh, T. G., Rai, R., Clark, S. K., & Tekkis, P. P.
- Venue
- Gut
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2006-12-21
- Volume
- 56
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 830-837
- ISSN
- 0017-5749 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-3288
- OpenAlex
- W2100626976
- Cited by
- 460
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 1.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A meta-analysis on the influence of inflammatory bowel disease on pregnancy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/gut.2006.108324
- The paper
- Cornish, J., Tan, E., Teare, J., Teoh, T. G., Rai, R., Clark, S. K., & Tekkis, P. P. (2007). A meta-analysis on the influence of inflammatory bowel disease on pregnancy. Gut. https://doi.org/10.1136/gut.2006.108324
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.