The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Guidelines on the management of common bile duct stones (CBDS)
Abstract
The last 30 years have seen major developments in the management of gallstone-related disease, which in the United States alone costs over 6 billion dollars per annum to treat. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) has become a widely available and routine procedure, whilst open cholecystectomy has largely been replaced by a laparoscopic approach, which may or may not include laparoscopic exploration of the common bile duct (LCBDE). In addition, new imaging techniques such as magnetic resonance cholangiography (MR) and endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) offer the opportunity to accurately visualise the biliary system without instrumentation of the ducts. As a consequence clinicians are now faced with a number of potentially valid options for managing patients with suspected CBDS. It is with this in mind that the following guidelines have been written.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hammel, P., Couvelard, A., O'Toole, D., Ratouis, A., Sauvanet, A., Fléjou, J. F., Degott, C., Belghiti, J., Bernades, P., Valla, D., et al. (2001) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm200102083440604 · Cited by 427
Miller, K., Hell, E., Lang, B., & Lengauer, E. (2003) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/01.sla.0000094305.77843.cf · Cited by 200
Cited by
Tokyo Guidelines 2018: diagnostic criteria and severity grading of acute cholecystitis (with videos)
Yokoe, M., Hata, J., Takada, T., Strasberg, S. M., Asbun, H. J., Wakabayashi, G., Kozaka, K., Endo, I., Deziel, D. J., Miura, F., et al. (2018) · Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Sciences · doi:10.1002/jhbp.515 · Cited by 1,535
Tokyo Guidelines 2018: diagnostic criteria and severity grading of acute cholangitis (with videos)
Kiriyama, S., Kozaka, K., Takada, T., Strasberg, S. M., Pitt, H. A., Gabata, T., Hata, J., Liau, K., Miura, F., Horiguchi, A., et al. (2018) · Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Sciences · doi:10.1002/jhbp.512 · Cited by 761
Surgical versus endoscopic treatment of bile duct stones
Dasari, B. V., Tan, C. J., Gurusamy, K. S., Martin, D. J., Kirk, G., McKie, L., Diamond, T., & Taylor, M. A. (2013) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd003327.pub4 · Cited by 522
Self-citationAgresta, F., Ansaloni, L., Baiocchi, G. L., Bergamini, C., Campanile, F. C., Carlucci, M., Cocorullo, G., Corradi, A., Franzato, B., Lupo, M., et al. (2012) · Surgical Endoscopy · doi:10.1007/s00464-012-2331-3 · Cited by 215
Metadata
- Authors
- Williams, E. J., Green, J., Beckingham, I., Parks, R., Martin, D., & Lombard, M.
- Venue
- Gut
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2008-03-05
- Volume
- 57
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1004-1021
- ISSN
- 0017-5749 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-3288
- OpenAlex
- W2102653527
- Cited by
- 594
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 22.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Guidelines on the management of common bile duct stones (CBDS). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/gut.2007.121657
- The paper
- Williams, E. J., Green, J., Beckingham, I., Parks, R., Martin, D., & Lombard, M. (2008). Guidelines on the management of common bile duct stones (CBDS). Gut. https://doi.org/10.1136/gut.2007.121657
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
