The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Guidelines for the clinical management of familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP)
Open accessAbstract
Background: Familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) is a well-described inherited syndrome, which is responsible for <1% of all colorectal cancer (CRC) cases. The syndrome is characterised by the development of hundreds to thousands of adenomas in the colorectum. Almost all patients will develop CRC if they are not identified and treated at an early stage. The syndrome is inherited as an autosomal dominant trait and caused by mutations in the APC gene. Recently, a second gene has been identified that also gives rise to colonic adenomatous polyposis, although the phenotype is less severe than typical FAP. The gene is the MUTYH gene and the inheritance is autosomal recessive. In April 2006 and February 2007, a workshop was organised in Mallorca by European experts on hereditary gastrointestinal cancer aiming to establish guidelines for the clinical management of FAP and to initiate collaborative studies. Thirty-one experts from nine European countries participated in these workshops. Prior to the meeting, various participants examined the most important management issues according to the latest publications. A systematic literature search using Pubmed and reference lists of retrieved articles, and manual searches of relevant articles, was performed. During the workshop, all recommendations were discussed in detail. Because most of the studies that form the basis for the recommendations were descriptive and/or retrospective in nature, many of them were based on expert opinion. The guidelines described herein may be helpful in the appropriate management of FAP families. In order to improve the care of these families further, prospective controlled studies should be undertaken.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Syngal, S., Brand, R. E., Church, J. M., Giardiello, F. M., Hampel, H. L., & Burt, R. W. (2015) · American Journal of Gastroenterology · doi:10.1038/ajg.2014.435 · Cited by 1,662
Evans, D. G., Howard, E., Giblin, C., Clancy, T., Spencer, H., Huson, S. M., & Lalloo, F. (2010) · American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A · doi:10.1002/ajmg.a.33139 · Cited by 988
Mazzei, F., Viel, A., & Bignami, M. (2013) · Mutation Research - Fundamental and Molecular Mechanisms of Mutagenesis · doi:10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2013.03.003 · Cited by 95
Screening and Surveillance of Colorectal Cancer: A Review of the Literature
Maida, M., Dahiya, D. S., Shah, Y. R., Tiwari, A., Gopakumar, H., Vohra, I., Khan, A., Jaber, F., Ramai, D., & Facciorusso, A. (2024) · Cancers · doi:10.3390/cancers16152746 · Cited by 43
Metadata
- Authors
- Vasen, H. F. A., Möslein, G., Alonso, A., Aretz, S., Bernstein, I., Bertario, L., Blanco, I., Bülow, S., Burn, J., Capella, G., Colas, C., Engel, C., Frayling, I., Friedl, W., Hes, F. J., Hodgson, S., Järvinen, H., Mecklin, J.-P., Møller, P., Myrhøi, T., Nagengast, F. M., Parc, Y., Phillips, R., Clark, S. K., de Leon, M. P., Renkonen-Sinisalo, L., Sampson, J. R., Stormorken, A., Tejpar, S., Thomas, H. J. W., & Wijnen, J.
- Venue
- Gut
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2008-01-14
- Volume
- 57
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 704-713
- ISSN
- 0017-5749 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-3288
- OpenAlex
- W2143590679
- Cited by
- 704
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 29.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Guidelines for the clinical management of familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/gut.2007.136127
- The paper
- Vasen, H. F. A., Möslein, G., Alonso, A., Aretz, S., Bernstein, I., Bertario, L., Blanco, I., Bülow, S., Burn, J., Capella, G., Colas, C., Engel, C., Frayling, I., Friedl, W., Hes, F. J., Hodgson, S., Järvinen, H., Mecklin, J.-P., Møller, P., . . . Wijnen, J. (2008). Guidelines for the clinical management of familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP). Gut. https://doi.org/10.1136/gut.2007.136127
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.