Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 365

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Adalimumab for the treatment of fistulas in patients with Crohn’s disease

Open access
Colombel, J-F, Schwartz, D A, Sandborn, W J, Kamm, M A, D’Haens, G, Rutgeerts, P, Enns, R, Panaccione, R, Schreiber, S, Li, J, Kent, J D, Lomax, K G, Pollack, P F·2009·Gut

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of adalimumab in the healing of draining fistulas in patients with active Crohn’s disease (CD). Design: A phase III, multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo controlled study with an open-label extension was conducted in 92 sites. Patients: A subgroup of adults with moderate to severely active CD (CD activity index 220–450) for ⩾4 months who had draining fistulas at baseline. Interventions: All patients received initial open-label adalimumab induction therapy (80 mg/40 mg at weeks 0/2). At week 4, all patients were randomly assigned to receive double-blind placebo or adalimumab 40 mg every other week or weekly to week 56 (irrespective of fistula status). Patients completing week 56 of therapy were then eligible to enroll in an open-label extension. Main Outcome Measures: Complete fistula healing/closure (assessed at every visit) was defined as no drainage, either spontaneous or with gentle compression. Results: Of 854 patients enrolled, 117 had draining fistulas at both screening and baseline (70 randomly assigned to adalimumab and 47 to placebo). The mean number of draining fistulas per day was significantly decreased in adalimumab-treated patients compared with placebo-treated patients during the double-blind treatment period. Of all patients with healed fistulas at week 56 (both adalimumab and placebo groups), 90% (28/31) maintained healing following 1 year of open-label adalimumab therapy (observed analysis). Conclusions: In patients with active CD, adalimumab therapy was more effective than placebo for inducing fistula healing. Complete fistula healing was sustained for up to 2 years by most patients in an open-label extension trial. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00077779 and NCT00195715.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/gut.2008.159251

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 10 references

Cited by

See all 365

Metadata

Authors
Colombel, J.-F., Schwartz, D. A., Sandborn, W. J., Kamm, M. A., D’Haens, G., Rutgeerts, P., Enns, R., Panaccione, R., Schreiber, S., Li, J., Kent, J. D., Lomax, K. G., & Pollack, P. F.
Venue
Gut
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2009-02-06
Volume
58
Issue
7
Pages
940-948
ISSN
  • 0017-5749 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-3288
OpenAlex
W4230184840
Cited by
365
References
10
FWCI
13.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Adalimumab for the treatment of fistulas in patients with Crohn’s disease. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/gut.2008.159251
The paper
Colombel, J.-F., Schwartz, D. A., Sandborn, W. J., Kamm, M. A., D’Haens, G., Rutgeerts, P., Enns, R., Panaccione, R., Schreiber, S., Li, J., Kent, J. D., Lomax, K. G., & Pollack, P. F. (2009). Adalimumab for the treatment of fistulas in patients with Crohn’s disease. Gut. https://doi.org/10.1136/gut.2008.159251

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.