The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Thirty-day postoperative mortality after colorectal cancer surgery in England
Open accessAbstract
Objectives: To assess the variation in risk-adjusted 30-day postoperative mortality for patients with colorectal cancer between hospital trusts within the English NHS. Design: Retrospective cross-sectional population-based study of data extracted from the National Cancer Data Repository. Setting: All providers of major colorectal cancer surgery within the English NHS. Participants: All 160 920 individuals who underwent major resection for colorectal cancer diagnosed between 1998 and 2006 in the English NHS. Main outcome measures: National patterns of 30-day postoperative mortality were examined and logistic binary regression was used to study factors associated with death within 30 days of surgery. Funnel plots were used to show variation between trusts in risk-adjusted mortality. Results: Overall 30-day mortality was 6.7% but decreased over time from 6.8% in 1998 to 5.8% in 2006. The largest reduction in mortality was seen in 2005 and 2006. Postoperative mortality increased with age (15.0% (95% CI 14.1% to 15.9%) for those aged >80 years), comorbidity (24.2% (95% CI 22.0% to 26.5%) for those with a Charlson comorbidity score ≥3), stage of disease (9.9% (95% CI 9.3% to 10.6%) for patients with Dukes' D disease), socioeconomic deprivation (7.8% (95% CI 7.2% to 8.4%) for residents of the most deprived quintile) and operative urgency (14.9% (95% CI 14.2% to 15.7%) for patients undergoing emergency resection). Risk-adjusted control charts showed that one trust had consistently significantly better outcomes and three had significantly worse outcomes than the population mean. Conclusions: Significant variation in 30-day postoperative mortality following major colorectal cancer surgery existed between NHS hospitals in England throughout the period 1998–2006. Understanding the underlying causes of this variation between surgical providers will make it possible to identify and spread best practice, improve outcomes and, ultimately, reduce 30-day postoperative mortality following colorectal cancer surgery.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Sterne, J. A. C., White, I. R., Carlin, J. B., Spratt, M., Royston, P., Kenward, M. G., Wood, A. M., & Carpenter, J. R. (2009) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.b2393 · Cited by 7,299
Funnel plots for comparing institutional performance
Spiegelhalter, D. J. (2005) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.1970 · Cited by 832
Cited by
Development and validation of the Surgical Outcome Risk Tool (SORT)
Protopapa, K. L., Simpson, J. C., Smith, N. C. E., & Moonesinghe, S. R. (2014) · British Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1002/bjs.9638 · Cited by 305
Tan, C. J., Dasari, B. V. M., & Gardiner, K. (2012) · British Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1002/bjs.8689 · Cited by 257
Metadata
- Authors
- Morris, E. J. A., Taylor, E. F., Thomas, J. D., Quirke, P., Finan, P. J., Coleman, M. P., Rachet, B., & Forman, D.
- Venue
- Gut
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2011-04-12
- Volume
- 60
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 806-813
- ISSN
- 0017-5749 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-3288
- OpenAlex
- W2116398434
- Cited by
- 290
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 11.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Thirty-day postoperative mortality after colorectal cancer surgery in England. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/gut.2010.232181
- The paper
- Morris, E. J. A., Taylor, E. F., Thomas, J. D., Quirke, P., Finan, P. J., Coleman, M. P., Rachet, B., & Forman, D. (2011). Thirty-day postoperative mortality after colorectal cancer surgery in England. Gut. https://doi.org/10.1136/gut.2010.232181
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.