Cited by 226

Detection of miR-92a and miR-21 in stool samples as potential screening biomarkers for colorectal cancer and polyps

Wu, Chung Wah, Ng, Simon S M, Dong, Yu Juan, Ng, Siew Chien, Leung, Wing Wa, Lee, Chung Wa, Wong, Yee Ni, Chan, Francis K L +2 more·2012·Gut

Abstract

Objective The detection of molecular markers in stool samples is a potential strategy for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. This study evaluated the feasibility of detecting miR-21 and miR-92a in stool samples of patients with CRC or polyps. Methods The reproducibility of detection and stability of stool-based microRNA were evaluated. Stool samples were collected from 88 patients with CRC, 57 patients with colorectal polyps and 101 healthy controls. MiRNA levels in CRC tissues and stool samples were detected by real-time quantitative reverse transcription PCR. Stool miR-21 and miR-92a levels were compared before and after the removal of tumour or advanced adenoma. Results The study demonstrated that stool-based miRNA were stable with highly reproducible detection. The expression of miR-21 and miR-92a was significantly higher in CRC tissues compared with their adjacent normal tissues (p Conclusion Stool miRNA are useful for screening CRC and polyps.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/gut.2011.239236

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Previously reported elevation of epithelial miRNA markers in stool such as hsa-miR-92a-3p and 21-5p could have also stemmed from occult tumor bleeding.

    “Conversely, because of the overlapping expression, previously reported elevation of epithelial miRNA markers in stool such as hsa-miR-92a-3p and 21-5p could have also stemmed from occult tumor bleeding [23].”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wu, C. W., Ng, S. S. M., Dong, Y. J., Ng, S. C., Leung, W. W., Lee, C. W., Wong, Y. N., Chan, F. K. L., Yu, J., & Sung, J. J. Y.
Venue
Gut
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2011-09-19
Volume
61
Issue
5
Pages
739-745
ISSN
  • 0017-5749
  • 1468-3288
Cited by
226
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review