Cited by 33Bariatric Surgery and OutcomesGastrointestinal motility and disordersDiabetes Management and Research

Effect of acarbose, pectin, a combination of acarbose with pectin, and placebo on postprandial reactive hypoglycaemia after gastric surgery.

Open access
Speth, P A, Jansen, J B, Lamers, C B·1983·Gut

Abstract

In a double-blind study we have compared the effect of 50 mg acarbose, 100 mg acarbose, 4.2 g pectin, a combination of 50 mg acarbose with 4.2 g pectin, and placebo on plasma glucose, plasma insulin, breath hydrogen and hypoglycaemic symptoms after a normal carbohydrate rich meal in nine patients with previous gastric surgery. Fifty milligrams acarbose, 100 mg acarbose and the combination of 50 mg acarbose with 4.2 g pectin significantly inhibited the postprandial peak glucose concentration (p less than 0.01). The lowest plasma glucose concentration, observed 60-150 minutes after ingestion of the meal, was significantly increased by the addition of 50 mg acarbose (p less than 0.01) and the combination of acarbose with pectin (p less than 0.05). The combination of acarbose with pectin was the only treatment that significantly inhibited the plasma insulin peak (p less than 0.05). Eight of nine patients had symptoms of hypoglycaemia on placebo, two on 50 mg acarbose (p less than 0.05), two on 100 mg acarbose (p less than 0.05), five on pectin (ns), and two on the combination of acarbose and pectin (p less than 0.05). All treatments with acarbose induced significant increases in breath hydrogen excretion (p less than 0.05).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/gut.24.9.798

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Several small studies demonstrated that acarbose improved glucose tolerance, reduced GI hormone release, reduced the incidence of hypoglycemia and improved symptoms in patients with dumping syndrome.

    “Several small studies demonstrated that acarbose improved glucose tolerance, reduced GI hormone release, reduced the incidence of hypoglycemia and improved symptoms in patients with dumping syndrome (Table 3) (8,34,53,58-66).”

    From Dumping syndrome after esophageal, gastric or bariatric surgery: Pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management (2017) · cites this paper as [53]

    The Results (page not supplied) show that acarbose attenuated the glucose curve, raised the glucose nadir, and reduced hypoglycaemic symptoms from eight patients on placebo to two. The paper does not establish a reduced incidence of hypoglycaemia as distinct from symptoms, and it did not measure GI hormone release; plasma insulin peaks were not significantly reduced by acarbose alone. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 23 · Cited by 33

Research works printed but not linked: 17

  1. Smith FW, Jeffries GH. Late and persistent post- gastrectomy problems. In: Sleisenger MH, Fordtran JS eds. Gastrointestinal diseases. Philadelphia: Saunders. 1973: 822-8.
  2. Woodward ER, Neustein CL. The late postprandial dumping syndrome. In: Bushkin FL, Woodward ER eds. Postgastrectomy syndromes. Philadelphia: Saunders, 1976: 28-33.
  3. Jenkins DJA, Gassull ME, Leeds AR et al. Effect of on August 1, 2023 by guest. Protected by copyright. http://gut.bmj.com/ Gut: first published as 10.1136/gut.24.9.798 on 1 September 1983. Downloaded from dietary fiber on complications of gastric surgery: prevention of postprandial hypoglycemia by pectin. Gastroenterology 1977; 72: 215-7.
  4. McLoughlin JC, Buchanan KD, Alam MJ. A glucoside-hydrolase inhibitor in treatment of dumping syndrome. Lancet 1979; 2: 603-5.
  5. Caspary WF. Sucrose malabsorption in man after ingestion of cr-glucosidehydrolase inhibitor. Lancet 1978; 1: 1231-3.
  6. Jenkins DJA. Taylor RH. Nineham R et al. Combined use of guar and acarbose in reduction of postprandial glycemia. Lancet 1979; 2: 924-7.
  7. Hoffman WS. A rapid photoelectric method for the determination of glucose in blood and urine. J Biol Chem 1937; 120: 51-5.
  8. Yalow RS. Berson SA. Immunoassay of endogenous plasma insulin in man. J. Clin Invest 1960; 39: 1157-75.
  9. Metz G, Gassull MA, Leeds AR, Blendis LM, Jenkins DJA. A simple method of measuring breath hydrogen in carbohydrate malabsorption by end-expiratory sampling. Clin Sci Mol Med 1976; 50: 237-40.
  10. Siegel S. Non-parametric statistics. Tokyo-London: McGraw-Hill Kogakusha, 1956.
  11. Schmidt DD, Frommer W, Junge B, Muller L, Wingender W, Truscheit E. a-glucosidase inhibitors; new complex oligosaccharides of microbial origin. Naturwissenschaften 1977; 64: S535.
  12. Holt S, Heading RC, Carter DC, Prescott LF, Tothill P. Effect of gel fibre on gastric emptying and absorption of glucose and.paracetamol. Lancet 1979; 1: 636-9.
  13. Jenkins DJA, Wolever TMS, Leeds AR et al. Dietary fibres, fibre analogues, and glucose tolerance: impor- tance of viscosity. Br Med J 1978; 1: 1392-4.
  14. Jenkins DJA, Bloom SR, Albuquerque RH et al. Pectin and complications after gastric surgery: normal- isation of postprandial glucose and endocrine responses. Gut 1980; 21: 574-9.
  15. Jenkins DJA, Goff DV, Leeds AR et al. Unabsorbable carbohydrates and diabetes: decreased postprandial hyperglycemia. Lancet 1976; 2: 172-4.
  16. Jenkins DJA, Leeds AR, Gassull MA, Cochet B, Alberti KGMM. Decrease in postprandial insulin and glucose concentrations by guar and pectin. Ann Intern Med 1977; 86: 20-3.
  17. Ludwig A, De Beukelaer P, Van Ooteghem M. Afgifte van geneesmiddelen verpakt in harde gelatinecapsules. Pharm Weekblad 1980; 115: 1461-7. on August 1, 2023 by guest. Protected by copyright. http://gut.bmj.com/ Gut: first published as 10.1136/gut.24.9.798 on 1 September 1983. Downloaded from

Authors
Speth, P. A., Jansen, J. B., & Lamers, C. B.
Affiliations
Radboud University Nijmegen (NL)
Venue
Gut
Publisher
BMJ
Published
1983-09
Volume
24
Issue
9
Pages
798-802
ISSN
  • 0017-5749 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-3288
OpenAlex
W2133791198
Cited by
33
References
23
Citations by year
2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
0.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Gut (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
Keywords
acarbose, pectin, reactive hypoglycaemia, postprandial blood glucose, gastric surgery, gastrectomy, alpha-glucosidase inhibitors, plasma insulin, breath hydrogen, carbohydrate-rich meal, hypoglycaemic symptoms
MeSH terms
Adult, Blood Glucose, Clinical Trials as Topic, Double-Blind Method, Drug Therapy, Combination, Female, Humans, Hydrogen, Hypoglycemia, Insulin, Male, Middle Aged, Oligosaccharides, Pectins, Postgastrectomy Syndromes, Trisaccharides, Acarbose

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review