The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Indications, methods, and outcomes of percutaneous liver biopsy in England and Wales: an audit by the British Society of Gastroenterology and the Royal College of Physicians of London.
Open accessAbstract
The liver section of the British Society of Gastroenterology and the research unit of the Royal College of Physicians collaborated to set up a nationwide audit to investigate the practice of percutaneous liver biopsy in England and Wales. Each of 189 health districts in England and Wales was approached to provide a list of 10 consecutive percutaneous biopsies performed during 1991, and details of demographic data, indications, suspected diagnosis, investigations, biopsy technique, outcome, and influence on patient management were collected. Data were retrieved on 1500 (79%). The age distribution showed 6% of biopsies were done in those over 80 years of age and as many over 90 as under 10 years of age. Suspected malignancy and chronic liver disease each contributed one third of the indications. In 34% the procedure was carried out by radiologists under ultrasound image control. The remainder were done by general physicians and gastroenterologists, with the operator in the second group being more senior and experienced. The Trucut biopsy needle accounted for two thirds of biopsies, the remainder being the Menghini type. For both needles the samples were recorded as excellent or satisfactory in 83% and inadequate in only 5%. Bleeding complicated 26 procedures (1.7%), requiring transfusion in 11, and was commoner when clotting was impaired or serum bilirubin raised. There were two definite and three possible procedure related, given an overall mortality of 0.13-0.33%. The diagnosis made before biopsy was confirmed in 63% of patients, and the clinician found the biopsy helpful in treatment in 75%. Day case biopsy and techniques to reduce the risk of bleeding were surprisingly rare in this series, which has given a unique opportunity to examine everyday practice across a wide range of hospitals.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Complications following percutaneous liver biopsy
Piccinino, F., Sagnelli, E., Pasquale, G., Giusti, G., Battocchia, A., Bernardi, M., Bertolazzi, R., Bianchi, F. B., Brunelli, E., Budillon, G., et al. (1986) · Journal of Hepatology · doi:10.1016/s0168-8278(86)80075-7 · Cited by 1,202
A 21-year experience with major hemorrhage after percutaneous liver biopsy
McGill, D. B., Rakela, J., Zinsmeister, A. R., & Ott, B. J. (1990) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1016/0016-5085(90)91167-5 · Cited by 647
Maharaj, B., Leary, W. P., Naran, A. D., Maharaj, R. J., Cooppan, R. M., Pirie, D., & Pudifin, D. J. (1986) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(86)90883-4 · Cited by 608
Outcome of Patients Hospitalized for Complications after Outpatient Liver Biopsy
Janes, C. H., & Lindor, K. D. (1993) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-118-2-199301150-00003 · Cited by 281
McAfee, J. H., Keeffe, E. B., Lee, R. G., & Rösch, J. (1992) · Hepatology · doi:10.1002/hep.1840150429 · Cited by 170
Sawyerr, A. M., McCormick, P. A., Tennyson, G. S., Chin, J., Dick, R., Scheuer, P. J., Burroughs, A. K., & McIntyre, N. (1993) · Journal of Hepatology · doi:10.1016/s0168-8278(05)80525-2 · Cited by 116
Self-citationColombo, M., Ninno, E. D., de Franchis, R., Fazio, C. D., Festorazzi, S., Ronchi, G., & Tommasini, M. (1988) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1016/0016-5085(88)90509-4 · Cited by 98
Zins, M., Vilgrain, V., Gayno, S., et al. (1992) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiology.184.3.1509076 · Cited by 76
Maharaj, B., & Bhoora, I. G. (1992) · Postgraduate Medical Journal · doi:10.1136/pgmj.68.806.964 · Cited by 67
Riley, S., Irving, H. C., Axon, A. T. R., et al. (1984) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(84)92910-6 · Cited by 65
Cited by
Neuberger, J., Patel, J., Caldwell, H., Davies, S., Hebditch, V., Hollywood, C., Hubscher, S., Karkhanis, S., Lester, W., Roslund, N., et al. (2020) · Gut · doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2020-321299 · Cited by 449
Transfusion guidelines for neonates and older children
(2004) · British Journal of Haematology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2141.2004.04815.x · Cited by 368
Update on Bispectral Index monitoring
Johansen, J. W. (2006) · Best Practice & Research Clinical Anaesthesiology · doi:10.1016/j.bpa.2005.08.004 · Cited by 313
Liver biopsy: complications and risk factors
Thampanitchawong, P. (2000) · World Journal of Gastroenterology · doi:10.3748/wjg.v5.i4.301 · Cited by 297
Coagulation in liver disease: A guide for the clinician
Northup, P. G., & Caldwell, S. H. (2013) · Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology · doi:10.1016/j.cgh.2013.02.026 · Cited by 268
Metadata
- Authors
- Gilmore, I. T., Burroughs, A., Murray-Lyon, I. M., Williams, R., Jenkins, D., & Hopkins, A.
- Venue
- Gut
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 1995-03-01
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 437-441
- ISSN
- 0017-5749 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2172076494
- Cited by
- 462
- References
- 11
- FWCI
- 6.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Indications, methods, and outcomes of percutaneous liver biopsy in England and Wales: an audit by the British Society of Gastroenterology and the Royal College of Physicians of London. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/gut.36.3.437
- The paper
- Gilmore, I. T., Burroughs, A., Murray-Lyon, I. M., Williams, R., Jenkins, D., & Hopkins, A. (1995). Indications, methods, and outcomes of percutaneous liver biopsy in England and Wales: an audit by the British Society of Gastroenterology and the Royal College of Physicians of London. Gut. https://doi.org/10.1136/gut.36.3.437
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.