The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Factors influencing morbidity and mortality in acute pancreatitis; an analysis of 279 cases.
Open accessAbstract
Of 279 patients admitted to a specialist unit with acute pancreatitis, 210 were admitted directly and 69 were transferred for treatment of local or systemic complications. Outcome was assessed in terms of mortality and morbidity and in relation to aetiology, predicted severity of disease (modified Glasgow score), organ failure (modified Goris multiple organ failure score), and need for surgical intervention. The death rate was 1.9% in patients admitted directly but was 18.8% in those transferred from other units. Mortality in gall stone related pancreatitis was 3% compared with 15% (p = 0.03) in pancreatitis of unknown aetiology and 27% (p = 0.01) in post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis. Mortality was related to age (mortality > 55 years old 11% v 2%; p = 0.003) and Goris score (score 0, mortality 0% v score 5-9, mortality 67%; p = 0.001). In patients transferred from other units, mortality was 11% in those transferred within a week of diagnosis and 35% when transfer was delayed (p = 0.04). Thirty six patients had pancreatic necrosis on dynamic computed tomography of whom 29 underwent pancreatic necrosectomy with a 34% mortality. Mortality was related to the modified Goris score (median score 2 in survivors v 6 in non-survivors; p = 0.005) and was higher when necrosectomy was performed within the first two weeks of admission (100% vs 21%; p = 0.004). In conclusion, mortality in acute pancreatitis is influenced by age, aetiology of the disease, and presence of organ failure. Patients transferred for specialist care have a 10-fold greater mortality than those admitted directly and mortality is greatest when transfer is delayed. Early necrosectomy carries a prohibitively high mortality.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Practice guidelines in acute pancreatitis
Banks, P. A., Freeman, M. L., & the Practice Parameters Committee of the American College of Gastroenterology (2006) · The American Journal of Gastroenterology · doi:10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00856.x · Cited by 2,050
Dervenis, C., Johnson, C. D., Bassi, C., Bradley, E., Imrie, C. W., McMahon, M. J., & Modlin, I. (1999) · International journal of pancreatology · doi:10.1007/bf02925968 · Cited by 451
Clinical practice guideline: management of acute pancreatitis
Greenberg, J. A., Hsu, J., Bawazeer, M., Marshall, J., Friedrich, J. O., Nathens, A., Coburn, N., May, G. R., Pearsall, E., & McLeod, R. S. (2016) · Canadian Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1503/cjs.015015 · Cited by 429
The incidence and aetiology of acute pancreatitis across Europe
Roberts, S. E., Morrison-Rees, S., John, A., Williams, J. G., Brown, T. H., & Samuel, D. G. (2017) · Pancreatology · doi:10.1016/j.pan.2017.01.005 · Cited by 409
Early Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome Is Associated With Severe Acute Pancreatitis
Singh, V. K., Wu, B. U., Bollen, T. L., Repas, K., Maurer, R., Mortele, K. J., & Banks, P. A. (2009) · Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology · doi:10.1016/j.cgh.2009.08.012 · Cited by 306
Metadata
- Authors
- de Beaux, A. C., Palmer, K. R., & Carter, D. C.
- Venue
- Gut
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 1995-07
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 121-126
- ISSN
- 0017-5749 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-3288
- OpenAlex
- W2099814989
- Cited by
- 310
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Factors influencing morbidity and mortality in acute pancreatitis; an analysis of 279 cases. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/gut.37.1.121
- The paper
- de Beaux, A. C., Palmer, K. R., & Carter, D. C. (1995). Factors influencing morbidity and mortality in acute pancreatitis; an analysis of 279 cases. Gut. https://doi.org/10.1136/gut.37.1.121
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.