The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Micrometastases: marker of metastatic potential or evidence of residual disease?
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Micrometastases within bone marrow have been shown to indicate a poor prognosis in patients with epithelial tumours. However, the degree to which micrometastases represent true residual disease or cell shedding and metastatic potential, is unclear. AIM: To explore whether micrometastases represent residual disease, bone marrow taken from carefully staged patients before and after (> 6 months) "curative" resection of a primary gastrointestinal cancer was studied prospectively. PATIENTS/METHODS: Seventy two consecutive patients were studied; the only exclusions were patients with known overt metastatic disease at the time of surgery. Micrometastatic cells were quantified per 10(5) marrow cells by flow cytometry after staining for contaminant cytokeratin-18 positive cells. RESULTS: Micrometastases were detected preoperatively in 22% (16/72) of all patients, comprising 11 (23%) of 48 with colorectal cancer, five (33%) of 15 with gastric adenocarcinoma and none (0%) of nine with oesophageal squamous cancer. Although fewer metastatic cells were detected in postoperative bone marrow, and clearance of marrow deposits was evident in most patients, the persistence of micrometastases in five of 16 patients after resection, without evidence of tumour recurrence, indicates a subset with true residual disease. Detection of micrometastases postoperatively (persistent or newly developed) was significantly associated with development of overt metastases during the subsequent 12-18 months of follow up (nine of 19 patients) when compared with patients testing negative for micrometastases (eight of 53; p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative detection of micrometastases may reflect either transient shedding of cells, metastatic potential or residual disease, but postoperative micrometastases indicate minimal residual disease. Identification of these patients is important because they may benefit from adjuvant therapy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Surgical intervention, while effective in removing localized tumors, is limited by tumor accessibility and the risk of incomplete resection. In cases of metastatic disease, surgery is often not viable, and recurrence is common due to residual cancer cells or micrometastases that evade detection [20].”
From Advances in green-synthesized magnetic nanoparticles for targeted cancer therapy: mechanisms, applications, and future perspectives (2026) · cites this paper as [20]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 16
- Mansi J., Berger U, Easton D, McDonnell T, Redding WH, Gazet JC, et al. Micrometastases in bone marrow in patients with primary breast cancer: evaluation as an early predictor of bone metastases. BMJ 1987; 295: 1093-6.
- Cote RJ, Rosen PP, Lesser ML, Old LJ, Osborne MP. Prediction of early relapse in patients with operable breast cancer by detection of occult bone marrow micro- metastases. JClin Oncol 1991; 9: 1749-56.
- CoteRJ,BeattieEJ,ChaiwunB, ShiS-R,HarveyJ, Chen S-C, et al. Detection of occult bone marrow micrometastases in patients with operable lung carcinoma. Ann Surg 1995; 222: 415-25.
- Pantel K, IzbickiJ, Passlick B, Angstwurm M, Haussinger K, Thetter 0, et al. Frequency and prognostic significance of isolated turmour cells in bone marrow of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer without overt metastases. Lancet 1996; 347: 649-53.
- Lindemann F, Schlimok G, Dirschedl P, Witte J, Riethmuller G. Prognostic significance ofmicrometastatic tumour cells in bone marrow of colorectal cancer patients. Lancet 1992; 340: 685-9.
- O'SullivanGC, CollinsJK, O'BrienF, Crowley B, MurphyK, Lee G, Shanahan F. Micrometastases in bone marrow of patients undergoing "curative" surgery for gastro- intestinal cancer. Gastroenterology 1995; 109: 1535-40.
- Nossal GJV. Minimal residual disease as the target for immunotherapy of cancer. Lancet 1994; 343: 1172-4.
- Sinicrope FA, Sugarman SM. Role of adjuvant therapy in surgically resected colorectal carcinoma. Gastroenterology 1995; 109: 984-93.
- Folkman J. Angiogenesis in cancer, vascular, rheumatoid and other disease. Nat Med 1995; 1: 27-31.
- Boyum A. Separation of leukocytes from blood and bone marrrow. ScandJ Clin Lab Invest 1968; 21: 31-50.
- Cordell JL, Falini B, Erber WN, Gosh AK, Abdulaziz Z, MacDonald S, et al. Immunoenzymatic labelling of monoclonal antibodies using immune complexes of alkaline phosphatase and monoclonal antialkaline phos- phatase (APAAP complexes). J Histochem Cytochem 1984; 32: 219-29.
- Schlimok G, Riethmiiller G. Detection, characterization and tumorigenicity of disseminated tumor cells in human bone marrow. Semin Cancer Biol 1990; 1: 207-15.
- Brugger W, Bross KJ, Glatt M, Weber F, Mertelsmann R, Kanz L. Mobilisation of tumor cells and hemapoietic progenitor cells into peripheral blood of patients with solid tumors. Blood 1994; 83: 636-40.
- Shpall EJ, Jones RB. Release of tumor cells from bone marrow. Blood 1994; 83: 623-5.
- Eschwege P, Dumas F, Blanchet P, Le Marie V, Benoit G, Jardin A, et al. Haematogenous dissemination of prostatic epithelial cells during radical prostatectomy. Lancet 1995; 346: 1528-30.
- Rubio CA, Emas S, Nylander G. A critical reappraisal of Dukes' classification. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1977; 145: 682-4. 515 on August 22, 2023 by guest. Protected by copyright. http://gut.bmj.com/ Gut: first published as 10.1136/gut.40.4.512 on 1 April 1997. Downloaded from
Cited by
Sorted by citations
El-khawaga, A. M., Youssef, O. I., El-dydamoni, O. A., Ragab, W. M., & Mohammed, R. A. E. (2026) · European Journal of Medical Research · doi:10.1186/s40001-025-03804-9 · Cited by 14
Metadata
- Authors
- O'Sullivan, G. C., Collins, J. K., Kelly, J., Morgan, J., Madden, M., & Shanahan, F.
- Venue
- Gut
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 1997-04
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 512-515
- ISSN
- 0017-5749
- 1468-3288
- Cited by
- 91
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review