Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 381

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Increase in mortality rates from intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma in England and Wales 1968–1998

Open access
Taylor-Robinson, S D, Toledano, M B, Arora, S, Keegan, T J, Hargreaves, S, Beck, A, Khan, S A, Elliott, P, Thomas, H C·2001·Gut

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The age standardised mortality rate per 100 000 population for all causes of liver tumours (International Classification of Disease 9 (ICD-9) 155) has almost doubled in England and Wales during the period 1979–1996. We further analysed the mortality statistics to determine which anatomical subcategories were involved. METHODS: Mortality statistics for liver tumours of ICD-9 155, 156, and subcategories, and for tumours of the pancreas (ICD-9 157), in England and Wales were investigated from the Office for National Statistics, London, from 1968 to 1996 inclusive. Data for 1997 and 1998 were also available on intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas. RESULTS: There has been a marked rise in age standardised mortality rates for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Since 1993, it represents the commonest recorded cause of liver tumour related death in England and Wales. This is evident in age groups older than 45 years. In contrast, mortality trends from other primary liver tumours, including hepatocellular carcinoma, were unremarkable. CONCLUSIONS: The observed increase in mortality from intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma may represent better case ascertainment and diagnosis due to improved diagnostic imaging, use of image guided biopsies, or increased use of ERCP. However, the trend started before ERCP was introduced nationally, mortality rates have continued to increase steadily thereafter, and there is no clear evidence that diagnostic transfers easily explains the findings. Alternatively, these observations may represent a true increase in intrahepatic bile duct tumours. Epidemiological studies are required to determine whether there is any geographical clustering of cases around the UK.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/gut.48.6.816

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 381

Metadata

Authors
Taylor-Robinson, S. D., Toledano, M. B., Arora, S., Keegan, T. J., Hargreaves, S., Beck, A., Khan, S. A., Elliott, P., & Thomas, H. C.
Venue
Gut
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2001-06-01
Volume
48
Issue
6
Pages
816-820
ISSN
  • 0017-5749 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-3288
OpenAlex
W2144715281
Cited by
381
References
1
FWCI
9.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Increase in mortality rates from intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma in England and Wales 1968–1998. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/gut.48.6.816
The paper
Taylor-Robinson, S. D., Toledano, M. B., Arora, S., Keegan, T. J., Hargreaves, S., Beck, A., Khan, S. A., Elliott, P., & Thomas, H. C. (2001). Increase in mortality rates from intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma in England and Wales 1968–1998. Gut. https://doi.org/10.1136/gut.48.6.816

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.