The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Identification of somatostatin receptor subtypes 1, 2A, 3, and 5 in neuroendocrine tumours with subtype specific antibodies
Open accessAbstract
Background and aims: Recently, novel somatostatin receptor (sstr) subtype specific ligand analogues have been developed for medical treatment of neuroendocrine tumours expressing different sstrs (sstr1–5). At present, individual expression patterns of sstr subtypes are based on methods such as in situ hybridisation and polymerase chain reaction at the transcriptional level. Therefore, we generated subtype specific antibodies against sstr1, 2A, 3, and 5 and analysed their presence, cellular localisation, distribution, and expression pattern in 33 gastrinomas, 36 insulinomas, and 35 tumours associated with a carcinoid syndrome by immunohistochemistry at the translational level. Methods: Western blotting experiments were performed in the normal human pancreas used as a reference organ and in tumour tissues; at the cellular level, sstrs were localised by immunohistochemistry in tissue paraffin sections. Results: In western blot analyses, the antibodies identified the respective receptors in their correct molecular range in extracts of the pancreas and neuroendocrine tumours. Using immunohistochemistry and immunofluorescence, the antibodies specifically detected the receptors in islet cells of the normal pancreas. Immunohistochemistry in the tumours revealed that all investigated sstr subtypes were highly expressed in the different tumour types. The frequency and expression pattern of the individual sstr subtypes varied considerably not only between the different tumour types but also in each patient. Conclusions: We conclude that immunohistochemistry with subtype specific antibodies can be used in clinical routine work to analyse sstr expression patterns for each patient before treatment and to facilitate well directed individual medical therapy by administering subtype specific somatostatin analogues.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Opportunities in somatostatin research: biological, chemical and therapeutic aspects
Weckbecker, G., Lewis, I., Albert, R., Schmid, H. A., Hoyer, D., & Bruns, C. (2003) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd1255 · Cited by 559
Dromain, C., de Baere, T., Lumbroso, J., Caillet, H., Laplanche, A., Boige, V., Ducreux, M., Duvillard, P., Elias, D., Schlumberger, M., et al. (2005) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2005.01.013 · Cited by 389
Rationale for the use of somatostatin analogs as antitumor agents
Susini, C., & Buscail, L. (2006) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1093/annonc/mdl105 · Cited by 304
Pasireotide (SOM230): Development, mechanism of action and potential applications
Schmid, H. A. (2008) · Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology · doi:10.1016/j.mce.2007.09.006 · Cited by 290
Günther, T., Tulipano, G., Dournaud, P., Bousquet, C., Csaba, Z., Kreienkamp, H.-J., Lupp, A., Korbonits, M., Castaño, J. P., Wester, H.-J., et al. (2018) · Pharmacological Reviews · doi:10.1124/pr.117.015388 · Cited by 253
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Kulaksiz, H., Eissele, R., Rössler, D., Schulz, S., Höllt, V, Cetin, Y., & Arnold, R.
- Venue
- Gut
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2002-01
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 52-60
- ISSN
- 0017-5749 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-3288
- OpenAlex
- W2112545770
- Cited by
- 209
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Identification of somatostatin receptor subtypes 1, 2A, 3, and 5 in neuroendocrine tumours with subtype specific antibodies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/gut.50.1.52
- The paper
- Kulaksiz, H., Eissele, R., Rössler, D., Schulz, S., Höllt, V, Cetin, Y., & Arnold, R. (2002). Identification of somatostatin receptor subtypes 1, 2A, 3, and 5 in neuroendocrine tumours with subtype specific antibodies. Gut. https://doi.org/10.1136/gut.50.1.52
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.