The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Diversity in the oesophageal phenotypic response to gastro-oesophageal reflux: immunological determinants
Open accessAbstract
Background and aims: Approximately 10% of adults experience gastro-oesophageal reflux symptoms with a variable oesophageal response. A total of 60% have no endoscopic abnormality, 30% have oesophagitis, and 10% have Barrett's oesophagus. We investigated whether the inflammatory cell infiltrate and cytokine profiles of these clinical phenotypes merely vary in severity or are fundamentally different. Methods: Patients with reflux symptoms and a normal oesophagus (n=18), oesophagitis (n=26), and Barrett's oesophagus (n=22 newly diagnosed, n=28 surveillance) were recruited. Endoscopic and histopathological degrees of inflammation were scored. Cytokine expression was determined by competitive reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction and immunohistochemistry. Results: In oesophagitis, endoscopic and histopathological grades of inflammation correlated highly. mRNA expression of proinflammatory interleukin (IL)-1β, IL-8, and interferon γ (IFN-γ) were increased 3–10-fold compared with non-inflamed squamous or Barrett's oesophageal samples. There was a modest increase in anti-inflammatory IL-10 but no increase in IL-4. In Barrett's oesophagus, 29/50 had no endoscopic evidence of inflammation and histopathological inflammation was mild in 17/50 and moderate in 24/50, independent of acid suppressants. Expression of IL-1β, IL-8, and IFN-γ was similar to non-inflamed squamous mucosa. IL-10 was increased 1.6-fold similar to oesophagitis. IL-4 was increased fourfold, with 100-fold increase in IL-4/T cell receptor expression, compared with squamous oesophagus or oesophagitis. Conclusions: Barrett's oesophagus is characterised by a distinct Th-2 predominant cytokine profile compared with the proinflammatory nature of oesophagitis. The specific oesophageal immune responses may influence disease development and progression.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Practical Statistics for Medical Research
Altman, D. G. (1990) · doi:10.1201/9780429258589 · Cited by 10,668
Cited by
Souza, R. F., Huo, X., Mittal, V., Schuler, C. M., Carmack, S. W., Zhang, H. Y., Zhang, X., Yu, C., Hormi–Carver, K., Genta, R. M., et al. (2009) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2009.07.055 · Cited by 406
Yang, L., Francois, F., & Pei, Z. (2012) · Clinical Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-11-0934 · Cited by 192
Gastroesophageal reflux disease–from reflux episodes to mucosal inflammation
Kandulski, A., & Malfertheiner, P. (2012) · Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology · doi:10.1038/nrgastro.2011.210 · Cited by 76
Metadata
- Authors
- Fitzgerald, R. C., Onwuegbusi, B. A., Bajaj-Elliott, M., Saeed, I. T., Burnham, W. R., & Farthing, M. J. G.
- Venue
- Gut
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2002-04
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 451-459
- ISSN
- 0017-5749 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-3288
- OpenAlex
- W2035386878
- Cited by
- 264
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Diversity in the oesophageal phenotypic response to gastro-oesophageal reflux: immunological determinants. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/gut.50.4.451
- The paper
- Fitzgerald, R. C., Onwuegbusi, B. A., Bajaj-Elliott, M., Saeed, I. T., Burnham, W. R., & Farthing, M. J. G. (2002). Diversity in the oesophageal phenotypic response to gastro-oesophageal reflux: immunological determinants. Gut. https://doi.org/10.1136/gut.50.4.451
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.