The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Risk factors for peptic ulcer disease: a population based prospective cohort study comprising 2416 Danish adults
Abstract
Background: No population based prospective cohort study has previously assessed the impact of multiple risk factors, including Helicobacter pylori infection, on the incidence of peptic ulcer disease (PUD). Aims: To identify risk factors for PUD and estimate their relative impact on ulcer incidence. Subjects: Random sample of 2416 Danish adults with no history of PU. Methods: Sample members were interviewed in 1982 and 1994. PUs diagnosed within the observation period were verified through medical records. Information on psychosocial factors, lifestyle practices, and medication was obtained from a questionnaire completed at study entry. H pylori infection status was determined by ELISA. Results: The main risk factors for PUD were H pylori infection (odds ratio 4.3 (95% confidence interval 2.2; 8.3)), tobacco smoking (3.8 (1.7; 9.8)), and use of minor tranquillisers (3.0 (1.4; 6.6)). Intake of non-steroid anti-inflammatory drugs did not affect the incidence of PUD (0.4 (0.1; 2.3)). In those with increased antibodies to H pylori , tobacco smoking (12.7 (2.8; 56.8)) and intake of spirits (2.4 (1.1; 5.4)) increased the risk of PUD whereas moderate leisure time physical activity (0.3 (0.2; 0.7)) protected against PUD. Conclusions: Tobacco smoking and H pylori infection are the main risk factors for PUD in Danish adults. Physical activity may protect against PUD in those infected with H pylori .
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Similar risk factors were reported in a more recent study in the Danish population [77], and coffee does not appear to significantly affect the risk of peptic ulcers.”
From Effects of Coffee on the Gastro-Intestinal Tract: A Narrative Review and Literature Update (2022) · cites this paper as [77]
In the citing paper
“Indeed, in most studies, there was no association between coffee drinking and the risk of peptic ulcers.”
From Effects of Coffee on the Gastro-Intestinal Tract: A Narrative Review and Literature Update (2022) · cites this paper as [77]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 41
- 10.1001/archinte.1992.00400160119023 · DOI
- 1998, Am J Epidemiol, 147, 529, 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009484 · DOI
- 10.1136/bjsm.34.2.116 · DOI
- 10.1136/jech.48.2.156 · DOI
- 1992, Am J Epidemiol, 135, 521, 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a116319 · DOI
- 10.1097/00001648-199707000-00012 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1097/00004836-199701000-00002 · DOI · Paper page
- 1989, J Clin Microbiol, 27, 1870, 10.1128/jcm.27.8.1870-1873.1989 · DOI · Paper page
- 1994, Scand J Gastroenterol, 29, 6
- 1996, J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 11, 825, 10.1111/j.1440-1746.1996.tb00087.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1136/gut.36.6.819 · DOI
- 10.1136/jech.54.6.444 · DOI
- 1992, APMIS, 100, 779, 10.1111/j.1699-0463.1992.tb04000.x · DOI
- 1995, Clin Diagnostic Lab Immunol, 2, 156, 10.1128/cdli.2.2.156-159.1995 · DOI
- 1998, Scand J Gastroenterol, 33, 24
- 1996, Am J Epidemiol, 143, 1157, 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a008694 · DOI
- 10.1097/00001648-200007000-00012 · DOI
- 1995, Ugeskr Læger, 157, 3457
- 1997, Am J Gastroenterol, 92, 442
- 1992, Am J Gastroenterol, 87, 1390
- 10.1046/j.1365-2036.2002.01197.x · DOI
- 2000, Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 12, 843, 10.1097/00042737-200012080-00003 · DOI
- 10.1080/00365529950172763 · DOI
- 1989, Scand J Gastroenterol, 24, 796, 10.3109/00365528909089216 · DOI
- 10.1136/gut.33.6.743 · DOI
- 10.1136/ewjm.173.2.101 · DOI
- 1974, Am J Epidemiol, 100, 397
- 10.1007/BF01296515 · DOI
- 1997, Am J Epidemiol, 145, 42, 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009030 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1572-0241.1999.01214.x · DOI
- 10.1080/003655298750026930 · DOI
- 2001, Am J Gastroenterol, 96, 1409
- 1999, Can J Gastroenterol, 13, 753
- 1974, N Engl J Med, 290, 469, 10.1056/NEJM197402282900901 · DOI
- 10.1086/315384 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1530-0277.1994.tb00895.x · DOI
- 2000, Scand J Public Health, 28, 32
- 1999, Am J Epidemiol, 149, 571, 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009854 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0002-9610(00)00486-4 · DOI
- 1995, BMJ, 311, 1657, 10.1136/bmj.311.7021.1657 · DOI
- 1999, Am J Clin Nutr, 69, 49, 10.1093/ajcn/69.1.49 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Wang, M., Luo, X., Xu, S., Liu, W., Ding, F., Zhang, X., Wang, L., Liu, J., Hu, J., & Wang, W. (2019) · The Lancet Respiratory Medicine · doi:10.1016/s2213-2600(18)30432-6 · Cited by 326
Effects of Coffee on the Gastro-Intestinal Tract: A Narrative Review and Literature Update
Nehlig, A. (2022) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu14020399 · Cited by 158
Metadata
- Authors
- Rosenstock, S., Jørgensen, T., Bonnevie, O., & Andersen, L.
- Venue
- Gut
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2003-02
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 186-193
- ISSN
- 0017-5749
- 1468-3288
- Cited by
- 171
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.