Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 952

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Guidelines for the management of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine (including carcinoid) tumours (NETs)

Open access
Ramage, John K, Ahmed, A, Ardill, J, Bax, N, Breen, D J, Caplin, M E, Corrie, P, Davar, J, Davies, A H, Lewington, V, Meyer, T, Newell-Price, J, Poston, G, Reed, N, Rockall, A, Steward, W, Thakker, R V, Toubanakis, C, Valle, J, Verbeke, C, Grossman, A B·2012·Gut

Abstract

These guidelines update previous guidance published in 2005. They have been revised by a group who are members of the UK and Ireland Neuroendocrine Tumour Society with endorsement from the clinical committees of the British Society of Gastroenterology, the Society for Endocrinology, the Association of Surgeons of Great Britain and Ireland (and its Surgical Specialty Associations), the British Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology and others. The authorship represents leaders of the various groups in the UK and Ireland Neuroendocrine Tumour Society, but a large amount of work has been carried out by other specialists, many of whom attended a guidelines conference in May 2009. We have attempted to represent this work in the acknowledgements section. Over the past few years, there have been advances in the management of neuroendocrine tumours, which have included clearer characterisation, more specific and therapeutically relevant diagnosis, and improved treatments. However, there remain few randomised trials in the field and the disease is uncommon, hence all evidence must be considered weak in comparison with other more common cancers.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/gutjnl-2011-300831

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 952

Metadata

Authors
Ramage, J. K., Ahmed, A., Ardill, J., Bax, N., Breen, D. J., Caplin, M. E., Corrie, P., Davar, J., Davies, A. H., Lewington, V, Meyer, T., Newell-Price, J., Poston, G., Reed, N., Rockall, A., Steward, W., Thakker, R. V., Toubanakis, C., Valle, J., Verbeke, C., & Grossman, A. B.
Venue
Gut
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2011-11-03
Volume
61
Issue
1
Pages
6-32
ISSN
  • 0017-5749 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-3288
OpenAlex
W2146946075
Cited by
952
References
3
FWCI
50.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Guidelines for the management of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine (including carcinoid) tumours (NETs). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/gutjnl-2011-300831
The paper
Ramage, J. K., Ahmed, A., Ardill, J., Bax, N., Breen, D. J., Caplin, M. E., Corrie, P., Davar, J., Davies, A. H., Lewington, V, Meyer, T., Newell-Price, J., Poston, G., Reed, N., Rockall, A., Steward, W., Thakker, R. V., Toubanakis, C., Valle, J., . . . Grossman, A. B. (2012). Guidelines for the management of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine (including carcinoid) tumours (NETs). Gut. https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2011-300831

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.