Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 289

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The relationship between infliximab concentrations, antibodies to infliximab and disease activity in Crohn's disease

Open access
Vande Casteele, Niels, Khanna, Reena, Levesque, Barrett G, Stitt, Larry, Zou, G Y, Singh, Sharat, Lockton, Steve, Hauenstein, Scott, Ohrmund, Linda, Greenberg, Gordon R, Rutgeerts, Paul J, Gils, Ann, Sandborn, William J, Vermeire, Séverine, Feagan, Brian G·2015·Gut

Abstract

Objective: Although low infliximab trough concentrations and antibodies to infliximab (ATI) are associated with poor outcomes in patients with Crohn's disease (CD), the clinical relevance of ATI in patients with adequate infliximab concentrations is uncertain. We evaluated this question using an assay sensitive for identification of ATI in the presence of infliximab. Design: In an observational study, 1487 trough serum samples from 483 patients with CD who participated in four clinical studies of maintenance infliximab therapy were analysed using a fluid phase mobility shift assay. Infliximab and ATI concentrations most discriminant for remission, defined as a C-reactive protein concentration of ≤5 mg/L, were determined by receiver operating characteristic curves. A multivariable regression model evaluated these factors as independent predictors of remission. Results: Based upon analysis of 1487 samples, 77.1% of patients had detectable and 22.9% had undetectable infliximab concentrations, of which 9.5% and 71.8%, respectively, were positive for ATI. An infliximab concentration of >2.79 μg/mL (area under the curve (AUC)=0.681; 95% CI 0.632 to 0.731) and ATI concentration of <3.15 U/mL (AUC=0.632; 95% CI 0.589 to 0.676) were associated with remission. Multivariable analysis showed that concentrations of both infliximab trough (OR 1.8; 95% CI 1.3 to 2.5; p<0.001) and ATI (OR 0.57; 95% CI 0.39 to 0.81; p=0.002) were independent predictors of remission. Conclusions: The development of ATI increases the probability of active disease even at low concentrations and in the presence of a therapeutic concentration of drug during infliximab maintenance therapy. Evaluation of strategies to prevent ATI formation, including therapeutic drug monitoring with selective infliximab dose intensification, is needed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/gutjnl-2014-307883

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 289

Metadata

Authors
Vande Casteele, N., Khanna, R., Levesque, B. G., Stitt, L., Zou, G. Y., Singh, S., Lockton, S., Hauenstein, S., Ohrmund, L., Greenberg, G. R., Rutgeerts, P. J., Gils, A., Sandborn, W. J., Vermeire, S., & Feagan, B. G.
Venue
Gut
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2014-10-21
Volume
64
Issue
10
Pages
1539-1545
ISSN
  • 0017-5749 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-3288
OpenAlex
W2136589391
Cited by
289
References
0
FWCI
21.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The relationship between infliximab concentrations, antibodies to infliximab and disease activity in Crohn's disease. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/gutjnl-2014-307883
The paper
Vande Casteele, N., Khanna, R., Levesque, B. G., Stitt, L., Zou, G. Y., Singh, S., Lockton, S., Hauenstein, S., Ohrmund, L., Greenberg, G. R., Rutgeerts, P. J., Gils, A., Sandborn, W. J., Vermeire, S., & Feagan, B. G. (2015). The relationship between infliximab concentrations, antibodies to infliximab and disease activity in Crohn's disease. Gut. https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2014-307883

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.