The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The relationship between infliximab concentrations, antibodies to infliximab and disease activity in Crohn's disease
Open accessAbstract
Objective: Although low infliximab trough concentrations and antibodies to infliximab (ATI) are associated with poor outcomes in patients with Crohn's disease (CD), the clinical relevance of ATI in patients with adequate infliximab concentrations is uncertain. We evaluated this question using an assay sensitive for identification of ATI in the presence of infliximab. Design: In an observational study, 1487 trough serum samples from 483 patients with CD who participated in four clinical studies of maintenance infliximab therapy were analysed using a fluid phase mobility shift assay. Infliximab and ATI concentrations most discriminant for remission, defined as a C-reactive protein concentration of ≤5 mg/L, were determined by receiver operating characteristic curves. A multivariable regression model evaluated these factors as independent predictors of remission. Results: Based upon analysis of 1487 samples, 77.1% of patients had detectable and 22.9% had undetectable infliximab concentrations, of which 9.5% and 71.8%, respectively, were positive for ATI. An infliximab concentration of >2.79 μg/mL (area under the curve (AUC)=0.681; 95% CI 0.632 to 0.731) and ATI concentration of <3.15 U/mL (AUC=0.632; 95% CI 0.589 to 0.676) were associated with remission. Multivariable analysis showed that concentrations of both infliximab trough (OR 1.8; 95% CI 1.3 to 2.5; p<0.001) and ATI (OR 0.57; 95% CI 0.39 to 0.81; p=0.002) were independent predictors of remission. Conclusions: The development of ATI increases the probability of active disease even at low concentrations and in the presence of a therapeutic concentration of drug during infliximab maintenance therapy. Evaluation of strategies to prevent ATI formation, including therapeutic drug monitoring with selective infliximab dose intensification, is needed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Yarur, A. J., Kanagala, V., Stein, D. J., Czul, F., Quintero, M. A., Agrawal, D., Patel, A., Best, K., Fox, C., Idstein, K., et al. (2017) · Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1111/apt.13970 · Cited by 308
Mitrev, N., Vande Casteele, N., Seow, C. H., Andrews, J. M., Connor, S. J., Moore, G. T., Barclay, M., Begun, J., Bryant, R., Chan, W., et al. (2017) · Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1111/apt.14368 · Cited by 282
Self-citationPediatric Inflammatory Bowel Disease
Conrad, M. A., & Rosh, J. R. (2017) · Pediatric Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/j.pcl.2017.01.005 · Cited by 86
Metadata
- Authors
- Vande Casteele, N., Khanna, R., Levesque, B. G., Stitt, L., Zou, G. Y., Singh, S., Lockton, S., Hauenstein, S., Ohrmund, L., Greenberg, G. R., Rutgeerts, P. J., Gils, A., Sandborn, W. J., Vermeire, S., & Feagan, B. G.
- Venue
- Gut
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2014-10-21
- Volume
- 64
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1539-1545
- ISSN
- 0017-5749 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-3288
- OpenAlex
- W2136589391
- Cited by
- 289
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 21.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The relationship between infliximab concentrations, antibodies to infliximab and disease activity in Crohn's disease. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/gutjnl-2014-307883
- The paper
- Vande Casteele, N., Khanna, R., Levesque, B. G., Stitt, L., Zou, G. Y., Singh, S., Lockton, S., Hauenstein, S., Ohrmund, L., Greenberg, G. R., Rutgeerts, P. J., Gils, A., Sandborn, W. J., Vermeire, S., & Feagan, B. G. (2015). The relationship between infliximab concentrations, antibodies to infliximab and disease activity in Crohn's disease. Gut. https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2014-307883
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.