Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,533

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 386 of the 386 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Management of Helicobacter pylori infection: the Maastricht VI/Florence consensus report

Open access
Malfertheiner, Peter, Megraud, Francis, Rokkas, Theodore, Gisbert, Javier P, Liou, Jyh-Ming, Schulz, Christian, Gasbarrini, Antonio, Hunt, Richard H, Leja, Marcis, O'Morain, Colm, Rugge, Massimo, Suerbaum, Sebastian, Tilg, Herbert, Sugano, Kentaro, El-Omar, Emad M·2022·Gut

Abstract

Helicobacter pylori: Infection is formally recognised as an infectious disease, an entity that is now included in the International Classification of Diseases 11th Revision. This in principle leads to the recommendation that all infected patients should receive treatment. In the context of the wide clinical spectrum associated with Helicobacter pylori gastritis, specific issues persist and require regular updates for optimised management. The identification of distinct clinical scenarios, proper testing and adoption of effective strategies for prevention of gastric cancer and other complications are addressed. H. pylori treatment is challenged by the continuously rising antibiotic resistance and demands for susceptibility testing with consideration of novel molecular technologies and careful selection of first line and rescue therapies. The role of H. pylori and antibiotic therapies and their impact on the gut microbiota are also considered. Progress made in the management of H. pylori infection is covered in the present sixth edition of the Maastricht/Florence 2021 Consensus Report, key aspects related to the clinical role of H. pylori infection were re-evaluated and updated. Forty-one experts from 29 countries representing a global community, examined the new data related to H. pylori infection in five working groups: (1) indications/associations, (2) diagnosis, (3) treatment, (4) prevention/gastric cancer and (5) H. pylori and the gut microbiota. The results of the individual working groups were presented for a final consensus voting that included all participants. Recommendations are provided on the basis of the best available evidence and relevance to the management of H. pylori infection in various clinical fields.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/gutjnl-2022-327745

Cites

386 of 386 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

1 retracted

Show all 386 references

Cited by

See all 1,533

Metadata

Authors
Malfertheiner, P., Megraud, F., Rokkas, T., Gisbert, J. P., Liou, J.-M., Schulz, C., Gasbarrini, A., Hunt, R. H., Leja, M., O'Morain, C., Rugge, M., Suerbaum, S., Tilg, H., Sugano, K., & El-Omar, E. M.
Venue
Gut
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2022-08-08
Volume
71
Issue
9
Pages
1724-1762
ISSN
  • 0017-5749 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-3288
OpenAlex
W4291016468
Cited by
1,533
References
386
FWCI
240.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Management of Helicobacter pylori infection: the Maastricht VI/Florence consensus report. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/gutjnl-2022-327745
The paper
Malfertheiner, P., Megraud, F., Rokkas, T., Gisbert, J. P., Liou, J.-M., Schulz, C., Gasbarrini, A., Hunt, R. H., Leja, M., O'Morain, C., Rugge, M., Suerbaum, S., Tilg, H., Sugano, K., & El-Omar, E. M. (2022). Management of Helicobacter pylori infection: the Maastricht VI/Florence consensus report. Gut. https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2022-327745

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.