The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Long term statin treatment reduces lipoprotein(a) concentrations in heterozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia
Abstract
Background: Raised plasma lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) is associated with increased risk of cardiovascular disease. It is unknown whether increased Lp(a) is an additional risk factor for coronary artery disease in familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH) or whether statin treatment can reduce Lp(a) concentrations in the long term. Objective: To investigate Lp(a) concentrations in relation to statin treatment and the progression of atherosclerosis in a large cohort of FH patients. Design: A two year, randomised, double blind trial (the ASAP trial). Patients: 325 heterozygous FH patients. Intervention: Treatment with 80 mg atorvastatin or 40 mg simvastatin. Main outcome measure: Change in Lp(a) concentrations and intima–media thickness of carotid artery segments at one year and two years. Results: At baseline, median Lp(a) concentrations were 327 mg/l and 531 mg/l in the atorvastatin and simvastatin arms, respectively (p = 0.03). In the atorvastatin arm, Lp(a) concentrations decreased to 243 mg/l after one year (p < 0.001) and to 263 mg/l after two years (p < 0.001). In the simvastatin arm, Lp(a) concentrations decreased to 437 mg/l after one year (p < 0.001) and to 417 mg/l after two years (p < 0.001). The difference in Lp(a) reduction between the two treatment arms was significant after one year (p = 0.004), but not after two years (p = 0.086). Lp(a) concentrations at baseline were not related to cardiovascular events at baseline. There was no correlation between baseline Lp(a) concentrations and low density lipoprotein cholesterol concentrations or intima–media thickness at baseline. Change in Lp(a) concentrations was not correlated with change in intima–media thickness after one or two years. Conclusions: Long term statin treatment significantly lowers Lp(a) in FH patients. However, this reduction was unrelated to changes in intima–media thickness and casts doubt on the importance of Lp(a) in the progression of atherosclerotic disease in these patients.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Another study reported that statin usage may decrease rather than increase Lp(a) levels among FH patients.
“Intriguingly, another study reported that statin usage may decrease rather than increase Lp(a) levels among FH patients85.”
From Functional interrogation of cellular Lp(a) uptake by genome-scale CRISPR screening (2025) · cites this paper as [85]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 19
- 1998, Am J Cardiol, 82, 57, 10.1016/S0002-9149(98)00728-0 · DOI
- 10.1097/00041433-199906000-00005 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0002-9149(98)00771-1 · DOI
- 1997, Clin Genet, 52, 254, 10.1111/j.1399-0004.1997.tb04342.x · DOI
- 10.1016/S0021-9150(00)00719-X · DOI
- 10.1161/01.CIR.102.10.1082 · DOI
- 10.1038/sj.ejhg.5200152 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)04053-8 · DOI
- 2001, Clin Drug Invest, 20, 67
- 10.1097/00041433-199508000-00007 · DOI
- 10.1001/jama.1995.03530220037029 · DOI
- 10.1016/0300-2977(96)00015-0 · DOI
- 1995, Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther, 33, 345
- 1995, Clin Cardiol, 18, 261, 10.1002/clc.4960180507 · DOI
- 10.1185/030079901750120204 · DOI
- 10.1161/01.CIR.101.2.207 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0002-9149(00)01429-6 · DOI
- 10.1161/01.CIR.93.10.1826 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0140-6736(95)92961-4 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Jellinger, P. S., Handelsman, Y., Rosenblit, P. D., Bloomgarden, Z. T., Fonseca, V. A., Garber, A. J., Grunberger, G., Guerin, C. K., Bell, D. S. H., Mechanick, J. I., et al. (2017) · Endocrine Practice · doi:10.4158/ep171764.appgl · Cited by 1,094
Kang, S., Wu, Y., & Li, X. (2004) · Atherosclerosis · doi:10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2004.08.005 · Cited by 126
Functional interrogation of cellular Lp(a) uptake by genome-scale CRISPR screening
Khan, T. G., Bragazzi Cunha, J., Raut, C., Burroughs, M., Vyas, H. S., Leix, K., Goonewardena, S. N., Smrcka, A. V., Speliotes, E. K., & Emmer, B. T. (2025) · Atherosclerosis · doi:10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2025.119174 · Cited by 6
Metadata
- Authors
- van Wissen, S., Smilde, T. J., Trip, M. D., de Boo, T., Kastelein, J. J. P., & Stalenhoef, A. F. H.
- Venue
- Heart
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2003-07-14
- Volume
- 89
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 893-896
- ISSN
- 1355-6037
- 1468-201X
- Cited by
- 58
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review