Cited by 41Heart Failure Treatment and ManagementCardiovascular Function and Risk FactorsDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins

Risk factors, treatment and prognosis in men and women with heart failure with and without diabetes

Johansson, Isabelle, Dahlström, Ulf, Edner, Magnus, Näsman, Per, Rydén, Lars, Norhammar, Anna·2015·Heart

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that risk factor pattern, treatment and prognosis differ between men and women with heart failure (HF) with and without diabetes in the Swedish Heart Failure Registry. METHODS: Patients with (n=8809) and without (n=27 465) type 2 diabetes (T2DM) included in the Swedish Heart Failure Registry (2003-2011) were followed for mortality during a median follow-up of 1.9 years (range 0-8.7 years). All-cause mortality, differences in background and HF characteristics were analysed in women and men with and without T2DM and with a special regard to different age groups. RESULTS: Of 36 274 patients, 24% had T2DM and 39% were women. In patients with T2DM, women were older than men (78 years vs 73 years), more frequently had hypertension, renal dysfunction and preserved ventricular function. Regardless of T2DM status, women with reduced ventricular function, compared with their male counterparts, were less frequently offered, for example, ACE inhibitors/angiotensin receptor II blockers (ARB). Absolute mortality was 48% in women with T2DM, 40% in women without; corresponding male mortality rates were 43% and 35%, respectively. Kaplan-Meier curves revealed shorter longevity in women with T2DM but female sex did not remain a significant mortality predictor following adjustment (OR 95% CI 0.90; 0.79 to 1.03). In those without T2DM, women compared with men lived longer; this pattern remained after adjustment (OR 0.72; 0.66 to 0.78). T2DM was a stronger predictor of mortality in women (OR 1.72; 1.53 to 1.94) than in men (OR 1.47; 1.34 to 1.61). CONCLUSIONS: T2DM is a strong mortality predictor in men and women with HF, somewhat stronger in women. The shorter survival time in women with T2DM and HF related to comorbidities rather than sex per se. Evidence-based management was less prevalent in women. Mechanisms behind these findings remain incompletely understood and need further attention.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/heartjnl-2014-307131

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 27 · Cited by 41

Authors
Johansson, I., Dahlström, U., Edner, M., Näsman, P., Rydén, L., & Norhammar, A.
Affiliations
  • Karolinska University Hospital (SE)
  • Linköping University (SE)
  • Karolinska Institutet (SE)
  • KTH Royal Institute of Technology (SE)
Corresponding author
Johansson, Isabelle
Venue
Heart
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2015-06-01
Volume
101
Issue
14
Pages
1139-1148
ISSN
  • 1355-6037 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-201X
OpenAlex
W2144423617
Cited by
41
References
27
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2
FWCI
3.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Heart (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Failure Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
Keywords
heart failure, type 2 diabetes, sex differences, mortality, prognosis, risk factors, ACE inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers, comorbidities, hypertension, renal dysfunction, evidence-based management, Swedish Heart Failure Registry
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Female, Heart Failure, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Registries, Risk Factors, Sex Factors, Sweden, Time Factors, Comorbidity, Multivariate Analysis, Chi-Square Distribution, Logistic Models, Odds Ratio, Treatment Outcome, Risk Assessment, Kaplan-Meier Estimate, Health Status Disparities, Healthcare Disparities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review