The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Cardiac output and related haemodynamics during pregnancy: a series of meta-analyses
Open accessAbstract
Objective: Cardiac output, a fundamental parameter of cardiovascular function, has consistently been shown to increase across healthy pregnancy; however, the time course and magnitude of adaptation remains equivocal within published literature. The aim of the present meta-analyses was to comprehensively describe the pattern of change in cardiac output during healthy pregnancy. Method: A series of meta-analyses of previously published cardiac output data during healthy, singleton pregnancies was completed. PubMed and Scopus databases were searched for studies published between 1996 and 2014. Included studies reported absolute values during a predetermined gestational age (non-pregnant, late first trimester, early and late second trimester, early and late third trimester, early and late postpartum). Cardiac output was measured through echocardiography, impedance cardiography or inert gas rebreathing. Observational data were meta-analysed at each gestational age using a random-effects model. If reported, related haemodynamic variables were evaluated. Results: In total, 39 studies were eligible for inclusion, with pooled sample sizes ranging from 259 to 748. Cardiac output increased during pregnancy reaching its peak in the early third trimester, 1.5 L/min (31%) above non-pregnant values. The observed results from this study indicated a non-linear rise to this point. In the early postpartum, cardiac output had returned to non-pregnant values. Conclusion: The present results suggest that cardiac output peaks in the early third trimester, following a non-linear pattern of adaptation; however, this must be confirmed using longitudinal studies. The findings provide new insight into the normal progression of cardiac output during pregnancy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 203: Chronic Hypertension in Pregnancy
(2019) · Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1097/aog.0000000000003020 · Cited by 871
Developmental origins of metabolic diseases
Hoffman, D. J., Powell, T. L., Barrett, E. S., & Hardy, D. B. (2021) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00002.2020 · Cited by 466
Expert review: preeclampsia Type I and Type II.
Yagel, S., Cohen, S. M., Admati, I., Skarbianskis, N., Solt, I., Zeisel, A., Beharier, O., & Goldman-Wohl, D. (2023) · American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology MFM · doi:10.1016/j.ajogmf.2023.101203 · Cited by 61
LeBlanc, E. S., Brooks, N., Davies, M., & Chatterjee, R. (2024) · The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/clinem/dgae655 · Cited by 11
Metadata
- Authors
- Meah, V. L., Cockcroft, J. R., Backx, K., Shave, R., & Stöhr, E. J.
- Venue
- Heart
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2016-01-21
- Volume
- 102
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 518-526
- ISSN
- 1355-6037 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-201X
- OpenAlex
- W2310581131
- Cited by
- 336
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 23.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cardiac output and related haemodynamics during pregnancy: a series of meta-analyses. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/heartjnl-2015-308476
- The paper
- Meah, V. L., Cockcroft, J. R., Backx, K., Shave, R., & Stöhr, E. J. (2016). Cardiac output and related haemodynamics during pregnancy: a series of meta-analyses. Heart. https://doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2015-308476
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.